Feasibility studies will be conducted in accordance with Reclamation's standards governing the approach, process and content of the feasibility study, including the Principles and Guidelines (incorporated by reference at § 404.4). You can obtain information about Reclamation's standards and requirements for conducting feasibility studies by contacting your local Reclamation office.
(a) Reclamation will evaluate whether the feasibility study adequately addresses all of the items required in Reclamation's standards for conducting a feasibility study, and is, therefore, ready for review. Reclamation standards and requirements for the content of a feasibility study are available at your local Reclamation office. Reclamation will notify you in writing of the outcome of this determination within 90 business days from the date of Reclamation's receipt of the feasibility study;
(b) If the feasibility study does not include the required information, you will be notified in writing of the reasons why, and you will have an opportunity to make changes and re-submit the corrected feasibility study to Reclamation for additional review. Where appropriate, Reclamation will work with you to suggest approaches to correct the feasibility study;
(c) Once Reclamation determines that the feasibility study includes all of the required information, Reclamation will review the study to determine, based on application of the criteria set forth in § 404.49, whether or not it is appropriate to recommend to Congress that it authorize construction of the project;
(d) Reclamation's review of the feasibility study will take no longer than 180 business days from the date that Reclamation determines that the study includes all of the required information and is ready for review; and
(e) Reclamation will document its findings in a feasibility report, as more fully described in section § 404.50.
In reviewing a feasibility study, Reclamation will assure that the proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the President and will apply the following criteria to evaluate and determine whether it is appropriate to recommend authorization for construction:
(a) The degree to which the project meets the prioritization criteria in § 404.13;
(b) The outcome of the environmental analysis;
(c) Whether there is a Federal interest in the project, including;
(1) A clearly defined Federal nexus to a proposed project;
(2) The Federal cost of the project in relation to the amount of Federal resources likely to be available; and
(d) Whether the recommended project alternative is clearly supported by the feasibility study, based on application of the following factors, including the extent to which the alternative:
(1) Addresses near and long-term water demand;
(2) Advances public health and safety and consideration of other benefits of the proposed rural water supply project;
(3) Addresses environmental quality and source water protection issues;
(4) Addresses opportunities to treat and use low-quality or non-potable water, water-reuse based supplies, and brackish and saline waters, through innovative and economically viable treatment technologies;
(5) Addresses opportunities for water conservation through structural or non-structural approaches and demonstration technologies to reduce water use and water system costs;
(6) Addresses opportunities to take advantage of economic incentives and the use of market-based mechanisms;
(7) Includes a reasonable and supported estimate of construction costs and operation, maintenance, and replacement costs;
(8) Is consistent with the Principles and Guidelines (incorporated by reference at § 404.4).
(9) Includes a reasonable and supported operation, maintenance, and replacement plan to assist the project sponsor in establishing rates and fees and a schedule identifying how those costs should be allocated to each non-Federal project sponsor;
(10) Demonstrates your financial capability to pay at least 25 percent of the design and construction costs and 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement costs;
(11) Is eligible for guaranteed loans;
(12) Includes adequate administrative and financial controls to manage construction and operation, maintenance, and replacement of the project;
(13) Is eligible for assistance under other Federal authorities to pay for discrete features or portions of the project;
(14) Is technically feasible and can be constructed within industry standards;
(15) Involves partnerships with other state, local, or tribal governments or Federal entities; and
(16) In the case of Indian tribes and tribal organizations, the extent to which the alternative addresses the goal of economic self-sufficiency;
(17) The degree to which the proposed project demonstrates that it has clear deliverables, will be accomplished within a reasonable schedule, within budget, and is well managed; and
(18) Other factors and criteria that Reclamation deems appropriate.
The feasibility report prepared by Reclamation will include:
(a) Reclamation's finding as to whether the proposed rural water supply project is feasible and the reasons supporting that determination;
(b) A recommendation to Congress regarding whether or not the proposed rural water supply project should be authorized for construction, and the reasons supporting the recommendation. This recommendation will be based on Reclamation's review of the feasibility study and its application of the criteria set forth in § 404.49; and
(c) If the rural water supply project is recommended for construction, the feasibility report will also include:
(1) The appropriate Federal and non-Federal share of the capital construction costs for the project and for projects involving multiple project sponsors, the portion of those costs allocated to each project sponsor;
(2) What amount of grants, loan guarantees, or combination of grants and loan guarantees should constitute the Federal share of the project;
(3) The annual operation, maintenance, and replacement costs, and the portion of those costs allocated to each project sponsor participating in the rural water supply project; and
(4) An assessment of the financial capability of each project sponsor participating in the rural water supply project to pay the portion of the construction and operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to it.
Yes. The Administration will review all projects proposed for funding under the Reclamation's Rural Water Supply Program. This includes review under Executive Order 12322 to determine whether the project is consistent with the policies and programs of the President. This review will occur before the feasibility report is finalized.
Upon its completion, Reclamation will:
(a) Provide the feasibility report to you;
(b) Submit the feasibility report to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives;
(c) Make the report publicly available, along with associated study documents; and
(d) Publish in the Federal Register a notice of the availability of the results.