(a) The definitions set forth below apply to this chapter 99.
Accrued benefit cost method. See 9904.412-30.
Accumulating costs. See 9904.401-30.
Actual cash value. See 9904.416-30.
Actual cost. See 9904.401-30 for the broader definition and 9904.407-30 for a more restricted definition applicable only to the standard on the use of standard costs for direct material and direct labor.
Actuarial assumption. See 9904.412-30 or 9904.413-30.
Actuarial cost method. See 9904.412-30 or 9904.413-30.
Actuarial gain and loss. See 9904.412-30 or 9904.413-30.
Actuarial liability. See 9904.412-30 or 9904.413-30.
Actuarial valuation. See 9904.412-30 or 9904.413-30.
Allocate. See 9904.402-30, 9904.403-30, 9904.406-30, 9904.410-30, 9904.411-30, 9904.418-30 or 9904.420-30.
Asset accountability unit. See 9904.404-30.
Assignment of cost to cost accounting periods. See 9903.302-1(b).
Bid and proposal (B&P) cost. See 9904.420-30.
Business unit. See 9904.410-30, 9904.411-30 or 9904.414-30.
CAS-covered contract, as used in this part, means any negotiated contract or subcontract in which a CAS clause is required to be included.
Category of material. See 9904.411-30.
Change to a cost accounting practice. See 9903.302-2.
Compensated personal absence. See 9904.408-30.
Cost accounting practice. See 9903.302-1.
Cost input. See 9904.410-30.
Cost objective. See 9904.402-30, 9904.406-30, 9904.410-30 or 9904.411-30.
Cost of capital committed to facilities. See 9904.414-30.
Currently performing, as used in this part, means that a contractor has been awarded a contract, but has not yet received notification of final acceptance of all supplies, services, and data deliverable under the contract (including options).
Deferred compensation. See 9904.415-30.
Defined-benefit pension plan. See 9904.412-30.
Defined-contribution pension plan. See 9904.412-30.
Direct cost. See 9904.402-30 or 9904.418-30.
Directly associated cost. See 9904.405-30.
Disclosure statement, as used in this part, means the Disclosure Statement required by 9903.202-1.
Entitlement. See 9904.408-30.
Estimating costs. See 9904.401-30.
Expressly unallowable cost. See 9904.405-30.
Facilities capital. See 9904.414-30.
Final cost objective. See 9904.402-30 or 9904.410-30.
Fiscal year. See 9904.406-30.
Funded pension cost. See 9904.412-30.
Funding agency. See 9904.412-30.
General and administrative (G&A) expense. See 9904.410-30 or 9904.420-30.
Home office. See 9904.403-30 or 9904.420-30.
Immediate-gain actuarial cost method. See 9904.413-30.
Independent research and development (IR&D) cost. See 9904.420-30.
Indirect cost. See 9904.402-30, 9904.405-30, 9904.418-30 or 9904.420-30.
Indirect cost pool. See 9904.401-30, 9904.402-30, 9904.406-30 or 9904.418-30.
Insurance administration expenses. See 9904.416-30.
Intangible capital asset. See 9904.414-30 or 9904.417-30.
Labor cost at standard. See 9904.407-30.
Labor-rate standard. See 9904.407-30.
Labor-time standard. See 9904.407-30.
Material cost at standard. See 9904.407-30.
Material inventory record. See 9904.411-30.
Material-price standard. See 9904.407-30.
Material-quantity standard. See 9904.407-30.
Measurement of cost. See 9904.302-1(c).
Moving average cost. See 9904.411-30.
Multiemployer pension plan. See 9904.412-30.
Negotiated subcontract, as used in this part, means any subcontract except a firm fixed-price subcontract made by a contractor or subcontractor after receiving offers from at least two persons not associated with each other or with such contractor or subcontractor, providing
(1) The solicitation to all competitors is identical,
(2) Price is the only consideration in selecting the subcontractor from among the competitors solicited, and
(3) The lowest offer received in compliance with the solicitation from among those solicited is accepted.
Net awards, as used in this chapter, means the total value of negotiated CAS-covered prime contract and subcontract awards, including the potential value of contract options, received during the reporting period minus cancellations, terminations, and other related credit transactions.
Normal cost. See 9904.412-30 or 9904.413-30.
Operating revenue. See 9904.403-30.
Original complement of low cost equipment. See 9904.404-30.
Pay-as-you-go cost method. See 9904.412-30.
Pension plan. See 9904.412-30 or 9904.413-30.
Pension plan participant. See 9904.413-30.
Pricing. See 9904.401-30.
Production unit. See 9904.407-30.
Projected average loss. See 9904.416-30.
Projected benefit cost method. See 9904.412-30 or 9904.413-30.
Proposal. See 9904.401-30.
Repairs and maintenance. See 9904.404-30.
Reporting costs. See 9904.401-30.
Residual value. See 9904.409-30.
Segment. See 9904.403-30, 9904.410-30, 9904.413-30 or 9904.420-30.
Self-insurance. See 9904.416-30.
Self-insurance charge. See 9904.416-30.
Service life. See 9904.409-30.
Small business, as used in this part, means any concern, firm, person, corporation, partnership, cooperative, or other business enterprise which, under 15 U.S.C. 637(b)(6) and the rules and regulations of the Small Business Administration in part 121 of title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations, is determined to be a small business concern for the purpose of Government contracting.
Spread-gain actuarial cost method. See 9904.413-30.
Standard cost. See 9904.407-30.
Tangible capital asset. See 9904.403-30, 9904.404-30, 9904.409-30, 9904.414-30 or 9904.417-30.
Termination gain or loss. See 9904.413-30.
Unallowable cost. See 9904.405-30.
Variance. See 9904.407-30.
Weighted average cost. See 9904.411-30.
(b) The definitions set forth below are applicable exclusively to educational institutions and apply to this chapter 99.
Business unit. See 9903.201-2(c)(2)(ii).
Educational institution. See 9903.201-2(c)(2)(i).
Intermediate cost objective. See 9905.502-30(a)(7).
Segment. See 9903.201-2(c)(2)(ii).
[57 FR 14153, Apr. 17, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 58802, Nov. 4, 1993; 59 FR 55770, Nov. 8, 1994; 61 FR 39361, July 29, 1996]
Cost accounting practice, as used in this part, means any disclosed or established accounting method or technique which is used for allocation of cost to cost objectives, assignment of cost to cost accounting periods, or measurement of cost.
(a) Measurement of cost, as used in this part, encompasses accounting methods and techniques used in defining the components of cost, determining the basis for cost measurement, and establishing criteria for use of alternative cost measurement techniques. The determination of the amount paid or a change in the amount paid for a unit of goods and services is not a cost accounting practice. Examples of cost accounting practices which involve measurement of costs are—
(1) The use of either historical cost, market value, or present value;
(2) The use of standard cost or actual cost; or
(3) The designation of those items of cost which must be included or excluded from tangible capital assets or pension cost.
(b) Assignment of cost to cost accounting periods, as used in this part, refers to a method or technique used in determining the amount of cost to be assigned to individual cost accounting periods. Examples of cost accounting practices which involve the assignment of cost to cost accounting periods are requirements for the use of specified accrual basis accounting or cash basis accounting for a cost element.
(c) Allocation of cost to cost objectives, as used in this part, includes both direct and indirect allocation of cost. Examples of cost accounting practices involving allocation of cost to cost objectives are the accounting methods or techniques used to accumulate cost, to determine whether a cost is to be directly or indirectly allocated to determine the composition of cost pools, and to determine the selection and composition of the appropriate allocation base.
In determining whether amounts of cost are material or immaterial, the following criteria shall be considered where appropriate; no one criterion is necessarily determinative:
(a) The absolute dollar amount involved. The larger the dollar amount, the more likely that it will be material.
(b) The amount of contract cost compared with the amount under consideration. The larger the proportion of the amount under consideration to contract cost, the more likely it is to be material.
(c) The relationship between a cost item and a cost objective. Direct cost items, especially if the amounts are themselves part of a base for allocation of indirect costs, will normally have more impact than the same amount of indirect costs.
(d) The impact on Government funding. Changes in accounting treatment will have more impact if they influence the distribution of costs between Government and non-Government cost objectives than if all cost objectives have Government financial support.
(e) The cumulative impact of individually immaterial items. It is appropriate to consider whether such impacts:
(1) Tend to offset one another, or
(2) Tend to be in the same direction and hence to accumulate into a material amount.
(f) The cost of administrative processing of the price adjustment modification shall be considered. If the cost to process exceeds the amount to be recovered, it is less likely the amount will be material.
In determining amounts of increased costs in the clauses at 9903.201-4(a), Cost Accounting Standards, 9903.201-4(c), Disclosure and Consistency of Cost Accounting Practices, and 9903.201-4(d), Consistency in Cost Accounting, the following considerations apply:
(a) Increased costs shall be deemed to have resulted whenever the cost paid by the Government results from a change in a contractor's cost accounting practices or from failure to comply with applicable Cost Accounting Standards, and such cost is higher than it would have been had the practices not been changed or applicable Cost Accounting Standards complied with.
(b) If the contractor under any fixed-price contract, including a firm fixed-price contract, fails during contract performance to follow its cost accounting practices or to comply with applicable Cost Accounting Standards, increased costs are measured by the difference between the contract price agreed to and the contract price that would have been agreed to had the contractor proposed in accordance with the cost accounting practices used during contract performance. The determination of the contract price that would have been agreed to will be left to the contracting parties and will depend on the circumstances of each case.
(c) The statutory requirement underlying this interpretation is that the United States not pay increased costs, including a profit enlarged beyond that in the contemplation of the parties to the contract when the contract costs, price, or profit is negotiated, by reason of a contractor's failure to use applicable Cost Accounting Standards, or to follow consistently its cost accounting practices. In making price adjustments under the Cost Accounting Standards clause at 9903.201-4(a) in fixed price or cost reimbursement incentive contracts, or contracts providing for prospective or retroactive price redetermination, the Federal agency shall apply this requirement appropriately in the circumstances.
(d) The contractor and the contracting officer may enter into an agreement as contemplated by subdivision (a)(4)(ii) of the Cost Accounting Standards clause at 9903.201-4(a), covering a change in practice proposed by the Government or the contractor for all of the contractor's contracts for which the contracting officer is responsible, provided that the agreement does not permit any increase in the cost paid by the Government. Such agreement may be made final and binding, notwithstanding the fact that experience may subsequently establish that the actual impact of the change differed from that agreed to.
(e) An adjustment to the contract price or of cost allowances pursuant to the Cost Accounting Standards clause at 9903.201-4(a) may not be required when a change in cost accounting practices or a failure to follow Standards or cost accounting practices is estimated to result in increased costs being paid under a particular contract by the United States. This circumstance may arise when a contractor is performing two or more covered contracts, and the change or failure affects all such contracts. The change or failure may increase the cost paid under one or more of the contracts, while decreasing the cost paid under one or more of the contracts. In such case, the Government will not require price adjustment for any increased costs paid by the United States, so long as the cost decreases under one or more contracts are at least equal to the increased cost under the other affected contracts, provided that the contractor and the affected contracting officers agree on the method by which the price adjustments are to be made for all affected contracts. In this situation, the contracting agencies would, of course, require an adjustment of the contract price or cost allowances, as appropriate, to the extent that the increases under certain contracts were not offset by the decreases under the remaining contracts.
(f) Whether cost impact is recognized by modifying a single contract, several but not all contracts, or all contracts, or any other suitable technique, is a contract administration matter. The Cost Accounting Standards rules do not in any way restrict the capacity of the parties to select the method by which the cost impact attributable to a change in cost accounting practice is recognized.