CLA-2-CO:R:C:S 556624 RAH
Mr. M. Ralph Latham
Import Manager
W.J. Byrnes & Company
433 Skinner Building
1326 Fifth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101-2691
RE: GSP; Gold Chains; Bracelets; Weaving; Soldering; Diamond
Cutting; Costs; Substantial Transformation
Dear Mr. Latham:
This is in response to your letters of February 4, and 27,
1992, requesting a ruling on behalf of Commercial Import and
Export Company (CI&CE).
FACTS:
CI&CE imports gold rope chains in varying gauges and lengths
as well as gold necklaces and bracelets of gold rope chain. The
rope chains, necklaces and bracelets are manufactured from 10K,
14K or 18K gold wire which is produced in Thailand by CI&CE's
factory (Chaingmai Chain and Jewelry Company) by melting pure
gold bars obtained from Thailand, the United States or Australia
with alloys from Thailand. The gold wire is made into links and
then woven together into approximately 18-inch pieces. The links
are soldered together with the use of gold and cadmium obtained
in the United States or Thailand. The 18-inch pieces are then
combined to make one continuous length, or alternatively, they
are made into necklaces and bracelets. The final processing
involves cleaning and polishing.
CI&CE also imports "diamond cut" rope chain, necklaces and
bracelets. The same manufacturing processes are performed with
the additional step of a machine process called diamond cutting
which is done after the chain is cleaned.
All the manufacturing processes are currently performed in
Thailand. CI&CE is contemplating performing the weaving of the
gold links into chain and the soldering of the links outside of
Thailand in either Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Sri Lanka or China.
The chains would then be returned to Thailand for the remaining
operations. CI&CE asks whether, under those circumstances, the - 2 -
merchandise would still be eligible for duty-free treatment under
the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP).
Bracelets made of regular rope chain and diamond cut rope
chain were submitted for our review.
ISSUES:
Whether, under the circumstances described above, the gold
rope chains, necklaces and bracelets from Thailand are entitled
to duty-free treatment under the GSP.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Under the GSP, eligible articles the growth, product or
manufacture of a designated beneficiary developing country (BDC)
which are imported directly into the customs territory of the
U.S. from a BDC may receive duty-free treatment if the sum of (1)
the cost or value of materials produced in the BDC, plus (2) the
direct costs of the processing operations in the BDC, is
equivalent to at least 35 percent of the appraised value of the
article at the time of entry. See, 19 U.S.C. 2463(b).
The 35 percent value-content and "imported directly"
requirements of 19 U.S.C. 2463(b) were conceived as separate and
distinct country of origin tests designed to ensure that the
benefits of the duty-free program actually accrue to the
countries for which they were intended. See, The Trade Act of
1973: Hearings on H.R. 10710 Before the Senate Committee on
Finance, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 326 (1974) (statement of William
D. Eberle, U.S. Special Representative for Trade Negotiations).
This goal is accomplished by limiting the opportunities during
which non-eligible goods may be commingled with eligible goods.
The importer must satisfy both requirements, in addition to the
"product of" requirement, in order to receive duty-free treatment
of its merchandise.
Thailand is a designated BDC. See, General Note
3(c)(ii)(A), HTSUS. Therefore, the articles will receive duty-
free treatment if they are considered to be the "product of"
Thailand, the 35 percent GSP value-content minimum is met, and
the goods are "imported directly" into the United States from
Thailand.
Merchandise is considered the "product of" a BDC if it
either is wholly the growth, product or manufacture of a BDC or
has been substantially transformed there into a new or different
article of commerce. 19 U.S.C. 2463(b)(2). A substantial
transformation occurs "when an article emerges from a
manufacturing process with a new name, character, or use which - 3 -
differs from that of the original material subjected to the
process." The Torrington Company v. United States, 764 F.2d
1563, 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1985).
It is well established that the first process in Thailand,
melting down gold bars and mixing with alloys to form wire to be
made into jewelry, constitutes a substantial transformation. HRL
071788 dated April 17, 1984, and HRL 555210 dated April 26, 1989.
Furthermore, we have held that conversion of gold wire into links
is a substantial transformation. HRL 555929 dated April 22.
1991.
The next question is whether the gold links (a product of
Thailand) are substantially transformed into a new and different
article of commerce in Burma, Laos, Cambodia, Sri Lanka or China,
where they will be woven together in approximately 18 inch pieces
and soldered. In that regard, Customs has held that weaving of
gold links into a chain and soldering gold chains together result
in a substantial transformation. See, HRL 555929 dated April 22,
1991.
The gold chains (now a product of the country where they
were woven and soldered together) are exported back to Thailand
to be cut into lengths, clasps attached, soldered to make
bracelets and/or necklaces, cleaned, polished and exported to the
United States. Alternatively, the chains will be combined into
one continuous length and cleaned. We find that soldering
closures (i.e., clasps, spring rings) to chains constitutes a
simple combining operation for which duty-free treatment under
the GSP is not allowed. 19 U.S.C. 2463(b)(2). It is our opinion
that the addition of the clasps, cleaning and polishing of the
gold chains provides new features thereto but does not change the
essence of the chains. The chains are dedicated to use as, and
have the essential character of, jewelry pieces such as bracelets
and/or necklaces. Furthermore, combining the chains into one
continuous length in Thailand does not result in a substantial
transformation. Additionally, Customs has long held that
cleaning and polishing operations do not create a new article or
alter the intended use of the article. See, HRL 556060 dated
August 27, 1991.
Finally, the diamond cutting operation performed on the
necklaces, bracelets, and continuous length chains would not
substantially transform the articles into "products of" Thailand.
We have generally held that cutting or engraving an article for
decorative purposes does not result in a substantial
transformation of that article. In rulings addressing this
issue, the engraving or decorative cutting operations were
performed on partially or nearly completed articles, and,
therefore, we determined that the operations were analogous to
finishing operations which do not result in a substantial - 4 -
transformation. See, HRL 731963 dated July 26, 1989 (hand-
faceting of jewelry, a process whereby a worker uses a diamond
tipped high-speed rotating wheel to cut away small pieces of
silver, does not result in a substantial transformation. See
also, HRL 043004 dated January 7, 1976, HRL 045106 dated April
22, 1976, and HRL 047663 dated March 21, 1977, each of which held
that decorative cutting of wine glasses does not result in a
substantial transformation.
In summary, although the chains, necklaces and bracelets
would be "imported directly" from Thailand, they would not be
"products of" that country, as discussed above. Therefore, they
will not be eligible for duty-free treatment under the GSP when
imported into the United States.
HOLDING:
Under the facts presented, the finished gold bracelets
and/or necklaces "imported directly" into the United States from
Thailand are not "products of" that country. Accordingly, they
will not be eligible for duty-free treatment under the GSP.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division