CLA-2 CO:R:C:M 953219 DFC
William J. Maloney, Esq.
Rode & Qualey
Attorneys at Law
295 Madison Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10017
RE: Footwear, leather, w/removable liners; Liners, neoprene;
Sets; Uppers, external surface area; T.D. 84-59; HRL's
084013, 086055, 088043, 952170
Dear Mr. Maloney:
Your letter dated December 14, 1992, addressed to the Area
Director of Customs in New York, on behalf of Adidas USA,
concerning the tariff classification under the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) of leather athletic shoes
with removable neoprene liners, has been referred to us for a
direct reply. You state that the country of origin of these
products is not yet determined.
FACTS:
The samples submitted are two men's high-cut athletic shoes
referred to as "frames," with molded rubber/plastic soles and
uppers of leather, textile, and plastic. Both samples have
foxing-like bands. Plastic components of the uppers include
molded plastic pieces referred to as "riemens" which are located
on either side of the foot and through which the laces are led;
and a molded plastic strap located at the back of the foot in the
Achilles heel area. The shoe "frame" contains open spaces on the
sides and back as well as the tongues of the shoes. Two
removable bootie-like liners made from neoprene laminated on the
inside and outside with a man-made textile were also submitted.
The liners, when inserted into the shoe "frames," are visible
where they come up higher than the "frames" and through the open
spaces. They appear to form part of the uppers. You state that
the liners for these shoes are not designed for or suitable for
wear outside of the shoes for which they are intended.
-2-
ISSUE:
1. What is the classification of the shoe "frames" [shoes
without liners] and each liner, if imported separately?
2. What is the classification of the complete shoes [shoe
"frames" imported with one pair of liners]?
3. What is the classification of shoe "frames" imported
with two or more pairs of liners?
4. What constitutes the external surface area of the upper
of each shoe?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Classification of goods under the HTSUS is governed by the
General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's). GRI 1 provides that
"classification shall be determined according to the terms of the
headings and any relative section or chapter notes, and, provided
such headings or notes do not otherwise require, according to
[the remaining GRI's taken in order]." In other words,
classification is governed first by the terms of the headings of
the tariff and any relative section or chapter notes.
QUESTION 1
In order to respond to this question it is necessary to
refer to GRI 2(a), HTSUS, and Note 4(a) to Chapter 64, HTSUS.
GRI 2(a), HTSUS, reads as follows:
Any reference in a heading to an article shall be taken
to include a reference to that article incomplete or
unfinished, provided that, as entered, the incomplete
or unfinished article has the essential character of
the complete or finished article. It shall also
include a reference to that article complete or
finished (or falling to be classified as complete or
finished by virtue of this rule), entered unassembled
or disassembled.
-3-
Note 4(a), to Chapter 64, HTSUS, reads as follows:
4. Subject to note 3 to this chapter:
(a) The material of the upper shall be taken to be the
constituent material having the greatest external
surface area, no account being taken of
accessories or reinforcements such as ankle
patches, edging, ornamentation, buckles, tabs,
eyelet stays or similar attachments[.]
The tongues of the shoes, even though their sizes and shapes
are unique, are not considered to be either external surface area
or accessories or reinforcements. See T.D. 84-59. The plastic
"riemens" on the sides overlay the leather and are accessories or
reinforcements, as are the plastic areas of the sole which
overlap the leather "frame." The plastic straps at the Achilles
heel area of the back should be considered as external surface
area of the uppers because without the liners, they are the only
material covering that part of the foot. It is to be noted that
Customs has taken the position that the term "accessories or
reinforcements," although not fully defined, includes any
additional material added to an otherwise completed upper as long
as the underlying material is a plausible upper material, even if
not the best material. See Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL)
084013 dated March 26, 1990. This means that the uppers are
almost all leather which mandates classification of the shoe
"frames" [incomplete or unfinished footwear] following GRI 2(a),
HTSUS, under subheading 6403.91.60, HTSUS, as footwear with outer
soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and
uppers of leather, other footwear, covering the ankle, other, for
men, youths and boys.
In HRL 086055 dated January 9, 1990, Customs ruled that
certain removable neoprene boot liners were classifiable under
heading 6117, HTSUS, as other made-up clothing accessories.
Classification under Chapter 64, HTSUS, as footwear or as parts
of footwear was not appropriate because the boot liners did not
possess outer soles and they were presumed not to remain in the
boot after the foot was removed. Further, the same rationale was
applied in HRL 952170 dated December 23, 1992, to classify
certain textile booties under heading 6117, HTSUS, rather than
under Chapter 64, HTSUS, as footwear or as parts of footwear.
Noting that the instant liners, unlike the liners involved in
HRLs 086055 and 952170, are not suitable for use other than with
the shoes for which they were intended, it is our position that
they are classifiable under subheading 6406.10.9040, HTSUSA, as
parts of footwear, uppers and parts thereof, other than
stiffeners, other, other, of textile materials other than cotton,
of man-made fibers. The textile category number is 669.
-4-
QUESTION 2&4
When a pair of shoe "frames" and a pair of liners are
imported together, the external surface area of the uppers of the
complete shoes includes all of the textile areas where the
textile liner is the only material covering the foot. Further,
textile will be considered the external surface area of the upper
in those areas where it is visible and tactile when the tongue is
removed, the areas where it comes up higher than the leather, and
all the places where it is visible and tactile through holes in
the leather. With respect to the two samples, a laboratory
measurement is necessary to determine whether the external
surface areas of their uppers is leather or textile.
If it is determined that the constituent material of the
uppers of the shoes involved is leather, the shoes would be
classifiable under subheading 6403.91.60, HTSUS, as footwear with
outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather
and uppers of leather, covering the ankle, other, for men, youths
and boys.
If it is determined that the constituent material of the
uppers of the shoes involved is textile, the shoes would be
classifiable under subheading 6404.11.90, HTSUS, as footwear with
outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather
and uppers of textile materials, footwear with outer soles of
rubber or plastics, sports footwear, tennis shoes, basketball
shoes, gym shoes, training shoes and the like, other, having a
foxing or a foxing-like band applied or molded at the sole and
overlapping the upper, other, other, valued over $12/pair.
QUESTION 3
GRI 3, HTSUS, is relevant in determining whether a pair of
shoe "frames" imported with two or more pairs of liners
constitutes a set for tariff purposes. It reads in pertinent
part as follows:
3. When by application of rule 2(b) or for any other
reason, goods are, prima facie, classifiable under two
or more headings, classification shall be effected as
follows:
(a) The heading which provides the most specific
description shall be preferred to headings
providing a more general description. However,
when two or more headings each refer to part only
of the materials or substances contained in mixed
or composite goods . . . those headings are to be
regarded as equally specific in relation to those
goods, even if one of them gives a more complete
-5-
or precise description of the goods.
(b) Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different
materials or made up of different components, and
goods put up in sets for retail sale, which cannot
be classified by reference to 3(a), shall be
classified as if they consisted of the material or
component which gives them their essential
character, insofar as this criterion is
applicable.
GRI 3(b), HTSUS, is germane here because GRI 3(a), HTSUS,
cannot be used in determining classification. The Harmonized
Commodity Description and Coding System Explanatory Notes (EN) to
the HTSUS, although not dispositive should be looked to for the
proper interpretation of the HTSUS. See 54 FR 35128 (August 23,
1989). EN 3(b)(X) at p.4, provides that the term "goods put up
in sets for retail sale" mean goods which:
(a) consist of at least two different articles which are,
prima facie, classifiable in different headings . . .;
(b) consist of products or articles put up together to meet
a particular need or carry out a specific activity; and
(c) are put up in a manner suitable for sale directly to
users without repacking (e.g., in boxes or cases or on
boards).
It is our opinion that a pair of shoe "frames" imported with
two or more pairs of liners meet the criteria set forth above for
being considered a set for tariff purposes. See HRL 088043 dated
December 24, 1990, and HRL 952170 dated December 23, 1992. Since
we have concluded that the "frames" and liners constitute a set
for tariff purposes, it is necessary to determine which component
of the set imparts the essential character thereto. EN
3(b)(VIII), at p. 4, reads as follows:
The factor which determines essential character will
vary as between different kinds of goods. It may, for
example, be determined by the nature of the material or
component, its bulk, quantity, weight or value, or by
the role of a constituent material in relation to the
use of the goods.
-6-
It is our opinion that the essential character of the liners
and shoe "frame" set is imparted by the shoe "frame." Although
the liner is essential for the practical use of the shoe "frame"
{uncomfortable to wear shoe without liner], its function is
subordinate to that of the shoe "frame" which provides a walking
or running surface which is the primary function of the set.
It is our position that this set is classifiable under
subheading 6403.91.60 or 6404.11.90, HTSUS, depending on the
constituent material of the uppers of the shoe as stated above.
HOLDING:
Pairs of shoe "frames" imported separately are classifiable
under subheading 6403.91.60, HTSUS.
The neoprene liners imported separately are classifiable
under subheading 6406.10.9040, HTSUSA.
One pair of shoe "frames" imported together with two or more
pairs of liners is classifiable as a set under subheading
6403.91.60, HTSUS, if the constituent material of the upper is
leather or under subheading 6404.11.90, HTSUS, if the constituent
material of the upper is textile.
The designated textile and apparel category may be
subdivided into parts. If so, the visa and quota category
requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be
affected. Since part categories are the result of international
bilateral agreements which are subject to frequent renegotiations
and changes, to obtain the most current information available, we
suggest you check, close to the time of shipment, the Status
Report on Current Import Quotas (Restraint Levels), an issuance
of the U.S. Customs Service, which is updated weekly and is
available at your local Customs office.
Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation
(the ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the
restraint (quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local
Customs office prior to the importation of this merchandise to
determine the current status of any import restraints or
requirements.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division