CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 089438 CRS
District Director
U.S. Customs Service
One Virginia Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28401
RE: Protest and application for further review on sized fabric
made from viscose filament rayon yarns and flax yarns; when warp
and filing yarns are of different material it is not necessary to
extract sizing from the fabric and allocate it according to the
relative weights of the individual yarns; HRL 088134; Note 2,
Section XI, EN (I)(A)(5).
Dear Sir:
This is in reply to a request for further review of protest
no. 1512-90-000103 of December 27, 1990, filed by Sandler, Travis
& Rosenberg on behalf of South-Eastern Fabrics Corp.
FACTS:
The protested merchandise consists of four entries of woven
fabric made from rayon and flax. Protestant contends the fabric
should be classified as a woven fabric of flax in heading 5309,
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated
(HTSUSA), based on an independent laboratory report which states
that the fabric is comprised of 51.4 percent linen (flax), 48.6
percent rayon.
However, the fabric was classified as a woven fabric of
artificial filament yarn of heading 5408, HTSUSA, based on an
analysis by Customs' Savannah laboratory, the fabrics contain
approximately 16.6 single yarns per centimeter in the warp and
13.2 single yarns in the filling. Microscopic examination shows
the warp yarns to be 100 percent rayon and the filling yarns to
be 100 percent flax. The samples tested weighed between 235 and
257 g/m, of which viscose rayon comprised from 50.7 percent to
52.5 percent of the total fabric weight.
ISSUE:
Whether the fabric in question is classifiable as a woven
fabric of flax or as a woven fabric of artificial yarn.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Note 2, Section XI, HTSUSA, provides that goods of Chapters
50 to 55 that are comprised of two or more textile materials are
to be classified as if they consisted wholly of that one material
that predominates by weight over each other single textile
material.
The Explanatory Notes, Harmonized Commodity Description and
Coding System, while not legally binding, constitute the official
interpretation of the Harmonized System at the international
level. General Explanatory Note (EN) (I)(A), Section XI, HTSUSA,
provides in relevant part that for the application of Note 2,
Section XI:
(5) Sizings or dressings...and also products for
impregnating, coating, covering or sheathing,
incorporated in textile fibres are not deemed to
be non-textile materials; in other words, the
weight of the textile fibres is calculated on the
basis of their weight in the state which they are
presented.
Thus Note 2, Section XI, and EN (I)(A)(5), requires that the
weight of any sizing be taken into account when calculating the
weight of the fibers at the time of importation.
In this case, since the warp yarns were wholly of rayon and
the filling yarns wholly of flax it was not necessary to extract
the sizing, and then allocate it to the rayon and flax based on
the relative weights of the yarns. See HRL 088134 dated March
26, 1991. Instead, the yarns were segregated and weighed. On
this basis it was determined that the fabric was composed of
between 50.7 percent and 52.5 percent rayon yarns, by weight.
Since filament viscose rayon predominated by weight over flax,
the fabric in question was therefore correctly classified in
heading 5407 under the provision for woven fabrics of artificial
filament yarn.
HOLDING:
The fabric in question is classifiable in subheading
5408.33.9030, HTSUSA, under the provision for woven fabrics of
artificial filament yarn...; other woven fabrics; of yarns of
different colors; other; other; other; sheeting. The fabric is
dutiable at the rate of 17 percent ad valorem and is subject to
textile quota category 627.
Since the rate of duty under the classification indicated
above is the same as the liquidated rate, you are instructed to
deny the protest in full. A copy of this decision should be
attached to the Form 19 Notice of Action.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director