VES-13-20 CO:R:IT:C 111361 JBW
Deputy Assistant Regional Commissioner
Commercial Operations
c/o Regional Commissioner
New Orleans, LA 70130-2341
RE: Vessel Repair; Stress of Weather; Casualty; Remission; 19
U.S.C. 1466; 19 C.F.R. 4.14; MOON TIDE; Entry # C20-
0000517-6.
Dear Madam:
This letter is in response to your memorandum of October 15,
1990, which forwards for our review and ruling the application
for relief filed on the above-referenced vessel repair entry.
FACTS:
The record reflects that the subject vessel, the M/V MOON
TIDE, arrived at the port of Morgan City, Louisiana, on June 18,
1990. Vessel repair entry, number C20-0000517-6, was filed on
the same day as arrival and indicated that repairs were made to
the vessel in Trinidad.
The applicant contends that damage to the vessel resulted
from stress of weather or casualty. In support of this claim,
the applicant has submitted statements by the master explaining
the events causing the damage, copies of the vessel log, invoices
describing the repairs made, and a copy of the damage report
filed by the master. These documents show that on May 9, 1990,
the vessel was engaged in the operation of picking up and
resetting a leg of an anchorage system used for ore ships off of
Trinidad and Venezuela. The ship's log shows that this
operation was being carried out in seas with swells of 10 to 12
feet. To reset the anchorage leg, a chain was employed. The
tension on the chain caused by an abrupt thrust of the ship
resulting from a large swell unseated the stern roller and forced
the roller mount to breach the #19 port ballast tank.
ISSUE:
Whether the evidence submitted demonstrates that the repairs
performed to the ship in a foreign shipyard were necessitated by
stress of weather and were necessary to secure the safety and
seaworthiness of the vessel.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Title 19, United States Code, section 1466, provides in
pertinent part for payment of duty in the amount of 50 percent ad
valorem on the cost of foreign repairs to vessels documented
under the laws of the United States to engage in foreign or
coastwise trade, or vessels intended to engage in such trade.
The statute provides for the remission of the above duties in
those instances where good and sufficient evidence is furnished
to show that foreign repairs were compelled by "stress of weather
or other casualty" and were necessary to secure the safety and
seaworthiness of the vessel to enable her to reach her port of
destination. 19 U.S.C. 1466(d)(1). Absent evidence to show
that the damage was the result of stress of weather or casualty,
we must conclude that the repairs were the result of wear and
tear. See C.S.D. 89-95, 23 Cust. B. & Dec., No. 43, 4, 5 (1989).
The description of the weather conditions appearing in the
record would not ordinarily justify remission under the general
guidelines established by the Customs Service. T.D. 78-180, 12
Cust. B. & Dec. 382 (1978). However, we stressed in that ruling
that the guidelines established are not conclusive and that if
damage would not require a pounding force of the sea, then
remission is possible under lesser conditions. Id. at 385. We
determine in this case that the weather encountered by the ship
was sufficient to cause the damage described. Moreover, the
damage impaired the safety and seaworthiness of the ship. We
thus find that the costs for the repairs is remissible under 19
U.S.C. 1466(d)(1).
HOLDING:
The damage to the ship was a direct result of the weather
conditions encountered by the ship, and the damage to the ship
impaired its safety and seaworthiness. We thus find that the
cost for repairs is remissible under 19 U.S.C. 1466(d)(1).
Sincerely,
B. James Fritz
Chief
Carrier Rulings Branch