CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 951739 HP
Mr. Mendel M. Jaroslawicz
Meg Tackle Imports, Inc.
58 Grant Avenue
Carteret, NJ 07008
RE: Crab nets are considered fishing nets, as opposed to similar to sports nets. Pier I
Imports; principle use; fish landing nets
Dear Mr. Jaroslawicz:
This is in reply to your letter of April 6, 1992. That letter concerned the tariff
classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated
(HTSUSA), of crab nets, produced in China.
FACTS:
The merchandise at issue consists of a two steel wire ring, cotton knotted netting crab
net. The diameter of the steel ring is approximately 47 cm (18.5"), with a bottom ring
measuring 28 cm (11"). The depth of the bowl is approximately 21.5 cm (8.5"). The net
is suspended by three cords joined to a steel hook. The net is of knotted cotton yarn or twine,
forming a 1.25" mesh. The clear plastic bag is which the net is sold is designated by No. CN-10.
ISSUE:
Whether the crab nets are considered similar to fish landing nets and butterfly nets, or
to fishing nets, under the HTSUSA? LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Heading 5608, HTSUSA, provides for, inter alia, made up fishing nets and other made
up nets, of textile materials. The Explanatory Notes (EN) to the Harmonized Commodity
Description and Coding System (Harmonized System) constitute the official interpretation of
the scope and content of the tariff at the international level. They represent the considered
views of classification experts of the Harmonized System Committee. Totes, Inc. v. United
States, No. 91-09-00714, slip op. 92-153, 14 Int'l Trade Rep. (BNA) 1916, 1992 Ct.
Intl. Trade LEXIS 158 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1992). While not treated as dispositive, the EN are
to be given considerable weight in Customs' interpretation of the HTSUSA. Boast, Inc. v.
United States, 15 Int'l Trade Rep. (BNA) 1188, 1993 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 19 (Ct. Int'l
Trade 1993). It has therefore been the practice of the Customs Service to follow, whenever
possible, the terms of the Explanatory Notes when interpreting the HTSUSA. The EN to this
heading provides:
(2) Made up fishing nets and other made up nets, of textile
materials.
* * *
Made up nets are nets, whether or not
ready for use, made directly to shape or assembled
from pieces of netting. The presence of handles,
rings, weights, floats, cords or other accessories
does not affect the classification of the goods of
this group.
Made up nets of this heading are restricted
to those nets not covered more specifically by
other headings of the Nomenclature. The heading
includes fishing nets....
The heading does not cover:
* * *
(c) Sports nets (e.g., goal nets and tennis nets), fish landing
nets and other nets of Chapter 95.
Heading 9507, HTSUSA, provides for, inter alia, fish landing nets, butterfly nets and
similar nets. The EN to this heading describes these nets as "usually consist[ing] of pocket-like
nets of textile yarn or cord, mounted on a wire support and fixed to a handle." Therefore,
if we consider the crab nets to be similar to the fish landing nets, classification in heading 9507
would be mandated. In HRL 087173 of September 18, 1990, we held that hand-cast string drawn fishing
nets used to catch bait were excluded from heading 5608, HTSUSA, and were properly
classified in heading 9507, HTSUSA. In HRL 951480 of March 28, 1994, however, we
revoked HRL 087173, and found that cast nets are not similar to sports nets or fish landing
nets. Accordingly, classification of the crab nets in heading 5608, HTSUSA, would be
correct.
HOLDING:
As a result of the foregoing, the instant merchandise is classified under subheading
5608.90.1000, HTSUSA, as knotted netting of twine, cordage or rope; made up fishing nets
and other made up nets, of textile materials, other, fish netting and fishing nets. The
applicable rate of duty is 17 percent ad valorem.
A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time
this merchandise is imported. If the documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling
should be brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the transaction.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division