CLA-2; CO:R:C:T 953273 ch
Seamodal Transport Corporation
161 West Victoria Street
Suite 230
Long Beach, California 90805
RE: Revocation of NYRL 869089; motor vehicle covers; automobile
covers; other made up textile articles v. motor vehicle
accessories; headings 6306 and 6307 v. 8708; car covers; EN to
HTS Nomenclature indicate that motor vehicle covers are to be
classified as other made up textile articles.
Dear Ms. Kajer:
New York Ruling Letter (NYRL) 869089, dated December 17,
1991, concerned the classification of automobile covers under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated
(HTSUSA). We have had occasion to review this ruling and find
that the classification of said merchandise under subheading
8708.99.5085, HTSUSA, is in error.
FACTS:
The imported product is an automobile cover and a drawstring
textile storage bag that is used to carry the cover. The cover
is made of Dupont TYVEK material. TYVEK material is made from
spunbonded nonwoven olefin filaments. The cover is used to
protect a car from dirt, dust, grime and moisture.
In NYRL 869089, we ruled that the automobile covers were
properly classified under subheading 8708.99.5085, which provides
for parts and accessories for motor vehicles.
ISSUE:
Are motor vehicle covers properly classified under heading
8708, which provides for parts and accessories for motor
vehicles, or under heading 6307, which provides for other made up
textile articles?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
The Explanatory Notes (EN) to the Harmonized Commodity
Description and Coding System constitute the official
interpretation of the nomenclature at the international level.
While not legally binding, they do represent the considered views
of classification experts of the Harmonized System Committee. It
has therefore been the practice of the Customs Service to follow,
whenever possible, the terms of the EN when interpreting the
HTSUSA.
The EN to heading 6307 state, in pertinent part, that the
heading includes "[l]oose covers for motor-cars." (Emphasis
added). In HRL 087596, we distinguished between "loose" motor
vehicle covers and motor vehicle covers that fit snugly over the
shape of an automobile. We found that covers designed to fit
tightly to the contours of a motor vehicle were not the "loose"
covers contemplated by heading 6307. Instead, we classified
fitted motor vehicle covers as parts and accessories for motor
vehicles.
We have re-examined the above-quoted language in light of
heading 6306, which covers "Tarpaulins, Awnings and Sunblinds;
Tents; Sails for Boats, Sailboards or Landcraft; Camping Goods."
The EN to heading 6306 state, in part, that:
This heading covers a range of textile articles usually
made from strong, close-woven canvas:
(1) Tarpaulins. These are used to protect goods
stored in the open or loaded on ships,
wagons, lorries, etc. against bad
weather...Tarpaulins are generally in the
form of rectangular sheets, hemmed along the
sides, and, and may be fitted with eyelets,
cords, straps, etc. Tarpaulins which are
specially shaped (e.g., for covering
hayricks, decks of small vessels, lorries,
etc.) also fall in this heading provided they
are flat.
Tarpaulins should not be confused with
loose covers for motor-cars, machines, etc.,
made of tarpaulin material to the shape of
these articles, nor with flat protective
sheets of lightweight material made up in a
similar manner to tarpaulins (heading 6307).
(Emphasis added).
Motor vehicle covers serve the same function as tarpaulins; i.e.
they protect automobiles from bad weather. These covers would be
classified as tarpaulins but for the fact that they are not flat
rectangular sheets. The EN to 6306 specify that tarpaulins
should not be confused with covers for motor vehicles made to the
shape of these articles, which are classifiable in heading 6307.
We have reached two conclusions based on the language of the
EN to 6306. First, there is no reason to distinguish between
"loose" motor vehicle covers and fitted covers. The EN to 6306
indicate that covers for motor vehicles shaped to the form of a
vehicle are still classifiable in heading 6307. There is no need
to further distinguish between covers that are shaped to the form
of a vehicle, yet are loosely draped over its contours, and
covers that fit tightly to the form of the vehicle.
Second, the EN to heading 6306 make it clear that the
authors of the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System
did not intend for motor vehicle covers to be classified as parts
and accessories for motor vehicles. Instead, automobile covers
must be viewed as items related to tarpaulins. Tarpaulins are
flat rectangular covers designed to protect goods in the open,
and are classified independently from the articles they protect.
As motor vehicle covers are not flat, they are not classifiable
as tarpaulins under heading 6306. However, this fact does not
transform the covers into parts and accessories. Rather, they
are to be classified as other made up textile articles not more
particularly described in the Nomenclature under heading 6307.
HOLDING:
The subject merchandise is classifiable under subheading
6307.90.9986, HTSUSA, which provides for other made up articles,
other, other, other, other, other. The applicable rate of duty
is 7 percent ad valorem.
This notice to you should be considered a revocation of NYRL
869089 under 19 CFR 177.9(d)(1). It is not to be applied
retroactively to NYRL 869089 (19 CFR 177.9(d)(2)) and will not,
therefore, affect past transactions for the importation of your
client's merchandise under that ruling. However, for the
purposes of future transactions in merchandise of this type, NYRL
869089 will not be valid precedent. We recognize that pending
transactions may be adversely affected by this revocation, in
that current contracts for importations arriving at a port
subsequent to this decision will be classified pursuant to it.
If such a situation arises, your client may, at its discretion,
notify this office and apply for relief from the binding effects
of this decision as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, please be advised that in some instances involving
import restraints, such relief may require separate approvals
from other government agencies.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director