CLA-2 CO:R:C:M 953672 RFA
Mr. Paul Wegener
M.G. Maher & Company, Inc.
One Canal Place
Suite 2100
New Orleans, LA 70130
RE: Match-a-Patch hole and tear mender; electro-thermic device;
circular and rectangular cut fabric patches; sets put up for
retail sale; GRI 3(b); essential character; ENs VIII and X
to GRI 3(b); Section XI, Note 7; Chapter 59, Note 2(a);
Heading 5903; HQ's 082644, 089568, 950472; Chapter 55,
Statistical Note 1(b) and 1(c)
Dear Mr. Wegener:
This is in response to your letter dated March 24, 1993, on
behalf of Singer Sewing, concerning the tariff classification of
the Match-a-Patch hole and tear mender under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
FACTS:
The merchandise, labeled as the Singer Match-a-Patch hole
and tear mender, model MAP100X, contains an electro-thermic
device ("Match-a-Patch") and various fabric patches. The fabric
patches are woven and made from 60 percent polyester and 40
percent cotton. It has a polyvinylchloride coating applied to
one side and weighs less than 170 grams per square meter. The
patches are made from bolts of U.S.-made fabric which are sent to
China to be cut into rectangular and circular patches.
The user selects a patch of the correct size and color, and
clamps it onto the item to be mended. The pre-heated Match-a-
Patch is placed over the patch which is then heat sealed onto the
item. The merchandise is designed for use in the home rather
than in a commercial or industrial setting.
ISSUE:
Is the Match-a-Patch hole and tear mender classifiable as a
set put up for retail sale under the HTSUS?
Are the fabric patches imported with the electro-thermic
device subject to any quota or visa requirements?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Classification of merchandise under the HTSUS is in
accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (GRI's),
taken in order. GRI 1 provides that classification shall be
determined according to the terms of the headings and any
relative section or chapter notes.
According to the information furnished, the merchandise is
designed for household or domestic use to repair or mend fabric
items. Based upon the principles of GRI 1, we find that the
electro-thermic device is provided for in subheading 8516.79.00,
HTSUS, as other electro-thermic appliances used for domestic
purposes. However, the Match-a-Patch is considered part of a set
which includes the circular and rectangular fabric patches. Each
item in the set is prima facie classifiable within two or more
headings. The fabric patches are provided for in either headings
6307, 5903, and 5513, HTSUS.
GRI 3(a) states that if a product is classifiable in two or
more headings by application of GRI 2(b), or for any other
reason, then the
heading which provides the most specific description
shall be preferred to headings providing a more general
description. However, when two or more headings each
refer to . . . part only of the items in a set put up
for retail sale, those headings are to be regarded as
equally specific in relation to those goods, even if
one of them gives a more complete or precise
description of the goods.
GRI 3(b) provides that "goods put up in sets for retail
sale, which cannot be classified by reference to 3(a), shall be
classified as if they consisted of the material or component
which gives them their essential character."
The Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System
Explanatory Notes (EN) constitute the Customs Cooperation
Council's official interpretation of the HTSUS. While not
legally binding, the ENs provide a commentary on the scope of
each heading of the HTSUS and are generally indicative of the
proper interpretation of these headings. To determine what is a
"set put up for retail sale", EN X to GRI 3(b), page 4, states
[f]or the purposes of this Rule, the term "goods put up
in sets for retail sale" shall be taken to mean goods
which:
(a) consist of at least two different articles which
are, prima facie, classifiable in different
headings;
(b) consist of products or articles put up together to
meet a particular need or carry out a specific
activity; and
(c) are put up in a manner suitable for sale directly
to users without repacking (e.g., in boxes or
cases or on boards).
The subject merchandise is a set, because: the items in it are
provided for in headings 8516, 6307, 5903, and 5513, HTSUS; all
of the products put together carry out the specific activity of
mending or patching a hole in fabric; and it is packaged in one
box to be sold directly to the user.
Because the item is a set, we must determine which component
provides the essential character. Based upon examination, it is
clear that the essential character of the set is imparted by the
Match-a-Patch due to its size, weight and value in comparison to
the other components of the set. Therefore, we find that the set
is classifiable within subheading 8516.79.00, HTSUS.
When there are components to a set which would not have been
classified under subheading 8516.79.0000, HTSUS, if they had been
classified individually (i.e., the fabric components), any
quota/visa categories applicable to these components will apply.
In an amendment to a directive issued by the Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA) it was stated that,
effective August 24, 1989, the directive of December 23, 1988, is
amended to read as follows:
Under the terms of Section 204 of the Agricultural Act
of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854); and in accordance
with the provisions of Executive Order 11651 of March
3, 1972, as amended; all applicable visa and quota
requirements will apply for textiles and their products
which are classified as part of a set. This rule applies
to all items which, if imported separately, would have
required a visa and the reporting of visa.
After reviewing the information provided, we find that the
bolts of U.S.-made fabric that are sent to China for cutting have
been advanced in value for purposes of conferring country of
origin status. The fabric patches are therefore considered
products of China.
We find that the proper classification for the circular cut
patches is subheading 6307.90.9986, HTSUS, which provides for
"other made up articles." Goods classified in this subheading
are not subject to visa requirements.
The 2 inch by 4 inch rectangular patches are not
classifiable as other made up articles under heading 6307, HTSUS,
because Section Note 7 to Section XI, HTSUS, states that for
purposes of classification within this Section the expression
"made up" means cut otherwise than into squares and rectangles.
Accordingly, the rectangular patches are classifiable as fabric.
The threshold issue is whether the fabric is deemed coated for
purposes of classification within chapter 59, HTSUS.
You indicate that the fabric is woven and is made from 60
percent polyester and 40 percent cotton. It has a
polyvinylchloride coating applied to one side and weighs less
than 170 grams per square meter. Because the fabric has a
plastic coating, it must be determined whether the coating is
deemed "visible to the naked eye" as mandated by Note 2(a) to
Chapter 59. Note 2(a)(1) to Chapter 59 states as follows:
Heading 5903 applies to: [t]extile fabrics impregnated,
coated, covered or laminated with plastics, whatever
the weight per square meter and whatever the nature of
the plastic material . . ., other than: [f]abrics in
which the impregnation, coating or covering cannot be
seen with the naked eye . . .; . . . no account is to
be taken of any resulting change in color. (emphasis
added)
The sole criterion upon which Customs is to determine
whether fabric is coated for purposes of classification under
heading 5903, HTSUS, is clear and unambiguous: fabric is
classifiable in Chapter 59 if the plastic coating is visible to
the naked eye. This standard does not allow the examiner to take
the "effects" of plastic into account. Plastic coating will
often lend a sheen to fabric, result in a change of color, or
increase a fabric's stiffness; these are factors which, while
indicative of the presence of plastic, may not be taken into
account in determining whether the plastic itself is visible to
the naked eye. We do note, however, that if upon unaided visual
examination there is the suggestion of the presence of plastic
coating, it is then within Customs' discretion to examine the
fabric under magnification. See HQ 082644, dated March 2, 1990.
Customs has consistently held that, for the purposes of
Chapter Note 2(a)(1) to Chapter 59, when a finished coated fabric
is indistinguishable from the base fabric itself, the coating on
the fabric is deemed not visible to the naked eye. See HQ 089568,
dated August 16, 1991. On the other hand, even when there is a
distinguishable difference between the coated and uncoated
portions of a fabric, it does not conclusively prove that the
coated portion is "visible" as per Chapter Note 2(a)(1) to
Chapter 59.
In order to make this determination, Customs also takes into
account whether there is a "distinctive difference in texture and
physical characteristics" between the base fabric and the coated
fabric. In HQ 950472, dated October 21, 1991, this office held
that nylon fabric coated on one side by polyurethane was visible
to the naked eye because it "blurred the surface of the fabrics."
Physical examination of the subject fabric reveals no such
blurring; the underlying weave of the fabric is distinct.
Moreover, when comparing the coated portion of the fabric with
the uncoated portion, both have equally distinct weaves. Because
the plastic coating is not visible to the naked eye, we find that
this fabric is precluded from classification as a coated fabric
under heading 5903, HTSUS.
The rectangular patches are woven, contain less than 85
percent synthetic staple fibers (polyester), weigh less than 170
grams per square meter, and are dyed. Accordingly,
classification is proper under subheading 5513.21, HTSUS. We
were not informed whether the fabric at issue is sheeting or
printcloth. If it is the former, classification is proper under
subheading 5513.21.0040, HTSUS, with an attendant textile
quota/visa category of 613. If the fabric is printcloth, it is
classifiable under subheading 5513.21.0060, HTSUS, with a textile
quota/visa category of 615. The prerequisites for classification
as sheeting or printcloth are set forth in Statistical Note 1(b)
and (c) to Chapter 55, and depend on the yarn count of the
submitted samples.
HOLDING:
The Match-a-Patch hole and tear mender set is classifiable
under subheading 8516.79.00, HTSUS, which provides for other
electro-thermic appliances of a kind used for domestic purposes.
The general, column one rate of duty is 5.3 percent ad valorem.
The circular cut patches are classifiable under subheading
6307.90.99, HTSUS, which provides for other made up articles.
The general, column one rate of duty is 7 percent ad valorem.
If the rectangular patches are sheeting, classification is
proper under subheading 5513.21.0040, HTSUS, with an attendant textile quota/visa category of 613. If it is printcloth, it is
classifiable under subheading 5513.21.0060, HTSUS, with a textile
quota/visa category of 615.
The designated textile and apparel category may be
subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements
applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since
part categories are the result of international bilateral
agreements which are subject to frequent negotiations and
changes, to obtain the most current information available, we
suggest that your client check, close to the time of shipment,
the Status Report on Current Import Quotas (Restraint Levels), an
issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, which is updated weekly and
is available at the local Customs office.
Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation
(the ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the
restraint (quota/visa) categories, your client should contact the
local Customs office prior to importation of this merchandise to
determine the current status of any import restraints or
requirements.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division