MAR-2 OT:RR:NC:N2:231
Ms. Sheri Lawson
Willson International Inc.
160 Wales Avenue
Suite 100
Tonawanda, NY 14150
RE: THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING AND STATUS UNDER THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (NAFTA) OF FROZEN SMELT.
Dear Ms. Lawson:
This is in response to your letter dated April 22, 2019 requesting a country of origin determination and the applicability of NAFTA to Frozen Smelt imported from Canada on behalf of your client, Presteve Foods Limited (Ontario, Canada).
You have outlined a scenario whereby Smelt (family Osmeridae) is harvested in Canadian waters by fishing vessels owned by Presteve Foods Limited. The fish caught is transported to the Great Lakes Foods plant in Chatham, Ontario where it is sorted by size, frozen and packed in totes for exportation to China. In China, the fish is thawed, deheaded, gutted, refrozen, packed and returned to a plant in Wheatley, Ontario. At the latter facility, the cartons of fish are opened for inspection, sorting and repacking according to the packaging specification of their clients.
You have made a request in your submission for the applicability of an unspecified Free Trade Agreement to your product for preferential treatment. Although you did not make specific mention of NAFTA, because the fish was harvested in Canada, and for the purposes of this ruling, we assume you are referring to NAFTA. Per General Note 12(l), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), “a good shall not be considered to be an originating good by reason of having undergone production that satisfies the requirements of subsection (a) if, subsequent to that production, the good undergoes further production or any other operation outside the territories of the NAFTA countries, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation necessary to preserve it in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of a NAFTA country.” Accordingly, the Frozen Smelt returned from China for packing in Canada will not be eligible for preferential treatment under NAFTA.
The marking statute, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article.
Section 134.1(b) of the regulations, defines “country of origin” as
the country of manufacture, production, or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the U.S. Further work or material added to an article in another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the “country of origin” within this part; however, for a good of a NAFTA country, the NAFTA Marking Rules will determine the country of origin.
Section 134.1(j) of the regulations, provides that the “NAFTA Marking Rules” are the rules promulgated for purposes of determining whether a good is a good of a NAFTA country. Section 134.1(g) of the regulations, defines a “good of a NAFTA country” as an article for which the country of origin is Canada, Mexico or the United States as determined under the NAFTA Marking Rules.
Section 102.11 of the regulations, sets forth the required hierarchy for determining whether a good is a good of a NAFTA country for the purposes of country of origin marking and determining the rate of duty and staging category applicable to an originating good as set out in Annex 302.2. Paragraph (a) of this section provides that the country of origin of a good is the country in which (1) the good is wholly obtained or produced, or (2) the good is produced exclusively from domestic materials, or (3) each foreign material incorporated into that good undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification set out in section 102.20 of the regulations.
In this case, nothing is added to the Canadian smelt in China; therefore, we find it is wholly obtained in Canada, and that the finished, packaged frozen smelt is a good of Canada for marking purposes. The packages should be marked accordingly, e.g., “Product of Canada.”
Effective July 6, 2018, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) imposed an additional tariff on certain products of China classified in the subheadings enumerated in Section XXII, Chapter 99, Subchapter III U.S. Note 20(b), HTSUS. The USTR imposed additional tariffs, effective August 23, 2018, on products classified under the subheadings enumerated in Section XXII, Chapter 99, Subchapter III U.S. Note 20(d), HTSUS. Subsequently, the USTR imposed further tariffs, effective September 24, 2018, on products classified under the subheadings enumerated in Section XXII, Chapter 99, Subchapter III U.S. Note 20(f) and U.S. Note 20(g), HTSUS. For additional information, please see the relevant Federal Register notices dated June 20, 2018 (83 F.R. 28710), August 16, 2018 (83 F.R. 40823), and September 21, 2018 (83 F.R. 47974).
Products of China that are provided for in subheading 9903.88.01, 9903.88.02, 9903.88.03, or 9903.88.04 and classified in one of the subheadings enumerated in U.S. Note 20(b), U.S. Note 20(d), U.S. Note 20(f) or U.S. Note 20(g) to subchapter III shall continue to be subject to antidumping, countervailing, or other duties, fees and charges that apply to such products, as well as to those imposed by the aforementioned Chapter 99 subheadings.
For purposes of making this origin, the substantial transformation test is applicable. A substantial transformation occurs when an article loses its identity and becomes a new article having a new name, character or use. United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., 27 CCPA 267 (1940); National Juice Products Association v. United States, 10 CIT 48 (1986). Whether a substantial transformation occurs is determined on a case-by-case basis.
In Koru North America v. United States, 701 F. Supp. 229 (CIT 1988), the court considered whether the processing of headed and gutted fish in South Korea by thawing, skinning, boning, trimming, freezing, and packaging constituted a substantial transformation. The court concluded that the processing performed in South Korea into “quick- frozen” fillets substantially transformed the headed fish because there was a change in name and character. The court noted that while the fish arrive in South Korea with the look of a whole fish, when they leave they no longer possess the essential shape of a fish. The fillets were considered discrete commercial goods and had a different tariff classification.
In the present case, the smelt is harvested in Canada, processed in China, i.e., thawed, deheaded, eviscerated), then are refrozen and shipped back to the United States. We find that the fish has not been substantially transformed as a result of the processing in China, and that therefore the country of origin of the frozen smelt is Canada.
Please note that seafood is subject to the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (“COOL”) requirements administered by the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), we advise you to check with that agency for their further guidance on your scenario.
Contact information for AMS is as follows:
USDA-AMS-LS-SAT
Room 2607-S, Stop 0254
1400 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20250-0254
Tel. (202) 720-4486
Website: www.ams.usda.gov/COOL
Email address for inquiries: [email protected]
This merchandise is subject to The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (The Bioterrorism Act), which is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Information on the Bioterrorism Act can be obtained by calling the FDA at 301-575-0156, or at the Web site www.fda.gov/oc/bioterrorism/bioact.html.
This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR Part 177).
A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact National Import Specialist Ekeng Manczuk at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Steven A. Mack
Director
National Commodity Specialist Division