§ 865.
Art. 65. Transmittal and review of records
(d)
Review by Judge Advocate General.—
(1)
By whom.—
A review conducted under this subsection may be conducted by an attorney within the Office of the Judge Advocate General or another attorney designated under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned.
(2)
Review of cases not eligible for direct appeal.—
(A)
In general.—
A review under subparagraph (B) shall be completed in each general and special court-martial that is not eligible for direct appeal under paragraph (1) or (3) of
section 866(b) of this title (article 66(b)).
(B)
Scope of review.—
A review referred to in subparagraph (A) shall include a written decision providing each of the following:
(i)
A conclusion as to whether the court had jurisdiction over the accused and the offense.
(ii)
A conclusion as to whether the charge and specification stated an offense.
(iii)
A conclusion as to whether the sentence was within the limits prescribed as a matter of law.
(iv)
A response to each allegation of error made in writing by the accused.
(3)
Review when direct appeal is waived, withdrawn, or not filed.—
(A)
In general.—
A review under subparagraph (B) shall be completed in each general and special court-martial if—
(ii)
the accused does not file a timely appeal in a case eligible for direct appeal under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of
section 866(b)(1) of this title (article 66(b)(1)).
(B)
Scope of review.—
A review referred to in subparagraph (A) shall include a written decision limited to providing conclusions on the matters specified in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of paragraph (2)(B).
(e)
Remedy.—
(1)
In general.—
If after a review of a record under subsection (d), the attorney conducting the review believes corrective action may be required, the record shall be forwarded to the Judge Advocate General, who may set aside the findings or sentence, in whole or in part.
(2)
Rehearing.—
In setting aside findings or sentence, the Judge Advocate General may order a rehearing, except that a rehearing may not be ordered in violation of
section 844 of this title (article 44).
(3)
Remedy without rehearing.—
(A)
Dismissal when no rehearing ordered.—
If the Judge Advocate General sets aside findings and sentence and does not order a rehearing, the Judge Advocate General shall dismiss the charges.
(B)
Dismissal when rehearing impracticable.—
(i)
In general.—
Subject to clause (ii), if the Judge Advocate General sets aside findings and orders a rehearing and the convening authority determines that a rehearing would be impractical, the convening authority shall dismiss the charges.
(ii)
Cases referred by special trial counsel.—
If a case was referred to trial by a special trial counsel, a special trial counsel shall determine if a rehearing is impracticable and shall dismiss the charges if the special trial counsel so determines.
([Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041], [70A Stat. 59]; [Pub. L. 90–179, § 1(6)], Dec. 8, 1967, [81 Stat. 546]; [Pub. L. 90–632, § 2(26)], Oct. 24, 1968, [82 Stat. 1341]; [Pub. L. 96–513, title V, § 511(25)], Dec. 12, 1980, [94 Stat. 2922]; [Pub. L. 98–209, § 6(d)(1)], Dec. 6, 1983, [97 Stat. 1401]; [Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LIX, § 5329], Dec. 23, 2016, [130 Stat. 2930]; [Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, § 1081(c)(1)(J)], Dec. 12, 2017, [131 Stat. 1598]; [Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, § 539A(a)], Dec. 27, 2021, [135 Stat. 1698].)