Historical and Revision Notes
This section grants broad general powers concerning policy matters to the Secretary. Many of the powers are contained in existing law but some are enlarged and some additional powers are added as explained following.
Subsection (a) is based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 95 ([Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 417], [39 Stat. 601]). Said section has been divided. The provision authorizing the Secretary to man stations seems more appropriately given to the operational head of the Service, the Commandant, and for that reason is incorporated in section 93(c) of this title.
Subsection (b) is based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§ 28, 42 ([Aug. 16, 1916, ch. 417], [39 Stat. 601]; [July 3, 1926, ch. 742, § 11], [44 Stat. 817]). These sections were rewritten in order to broaden existing authority in regard to the training of Coast Guard personnel at schools of the other armed forces, thus approaching a practice of war time, and making for economy in the training of Service personnel; such training would be on a basis mutually satisfactory to the Secretaries involved.
Subsection (c) is based on R.S. 4242 and on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§ 29, 93, 94, 98a (R.S. 4245, 4249; [May 4, 1882, ch. 117, § 2], [22 Stat. 56]; [Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 417], [39 Stat. 601]; [June 6, 1940, ch. 257, § 4], [54 Stat. 247]; [Aug. 6, 1947, ch. 502], [61 Stat. 786]). This subsection broadens existing law in that it provides general legislative authority for the construction and disposal of shore establishments of all types including aviation stations.
Subsection (d) is based in part on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§ 55, 57, 69, 109, and in part on title 31, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§ 487, 720, (R.S. 2748, 3618, 3692; [June 18, 1878, ch. 265, § 3], [20 Stat. 163]; [Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 417], [39 Stat. 601]). This subsection broadens existing law in that it provides general legislative authority for the design, construction, acquisition by other means, and disposal of vessels.
Subsection (e) is new. It is derived from title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 31b ([June 6, 1941, ch. 177], [55 Stat. 247] [which was originally repealed by [act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title VI, § 602(a)(28)], [63 Stat. 399], renumbered [Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, § 6(a)], (b), [64 Stat. 583]]) which provides for the exchange of vehicles, planes, and engines; similar authority in relation to vessels, is granted to the Secretary by this subsection and should prove advantageous to the Government.
Subsection (f) is based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 96 and on title 33, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§ 729, 730, 731 ([Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, § 1], [18 Stat. 372]; [Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 299], [35 Stat. 972]; [June 17, 1910, ch. 301, § 9], [36 Stat. 538]; [Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 168], [37 Stat. 1018]). This subsection broadens the power of the Secretary to receive as a gift or purchase sites for stations, to include the acquisition of land by any means provided it is for the purpose of executing duties and functions of the Coast Guard.
Subsection (g) is based in part on title 33, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 732 ([Aug. 28, 1916, ch. 414, § 2], [39 Stat. 538]; [July 11, 1941, ch. 290, § 1], [55 Stat. 584]) and grants authority to the Secretary to exchange interests in land as payment or part payment for other interests in land for the purpose of executing the duties and functions of the Coast Guard; this authority, on the basis of past experience, will prove advantageous to the Government.
Subsection (h) is new and merely insures that the Secretary may exercise any of the powers granted to the Commandant in this title.
Subsection (i) is based in part on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§ 51, 131 (R.S. 2756, 2758) and insures that the Secretary may do anything necessary to carry out the purposes of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.
Amendments
2018—[Pub. L. 115–282, § 105(b)], renumbered section 92 of this title as this section.
Subsec. (d). [Pub. L. 115–282, § 311(a)], inserted “aircraft, and systems,” after “vessels,”.
Subsecs. (e) to (i). [Pub. L. 115–232] redesignated subsecs. (f) to (i) as (e) to (h), respectively.
2011—Subsec. (d). [Pub. L. 111–350] substituted “division C (except sections 3302, 3501(b), 3509, 3906, 4710, and 4711) of subtitle I of title 41” for “title III of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 251 et seq.)”.
2002—Subsec. (d). [Pub. L. 107–217] inserted “subtitle I of title 40 and title III of” before “the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949” and substituted “(41 U.S.C. 251 et seq.)” for “(40 U.S.C. 471 et seq.)”.
1984—Subsec. (b). [Pub. L. 98–557] substituted reference to members for reference to officers and enlisted men.
1982—Subsec. (d). [Pub. L. 97–295] substituted “(40 U.S.C. 471 et seq.)” for “, as amended,” after “Act of 1949”.
1951—Subsec. (c). Act Oct. 31, 1951, § 3(3), struck out provision relating to sale or other disposition of unsuitable or unserviceable shore establishments, and disposition of the net monies received therefrom.
Subsec. (d). Act Oct. 31, 1951, § 2(9), inserted reference to applicable regulations of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended, and struck out requirement that net monies received from the disposition of vessels be covered into the Treasury.
Subsec. (e). Act Oct. 31, 1951, § 1(32), repealed subsec. (e) which empowered the Secretary to exchange vessels and parts thereof in part payment for new vessels.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
At-Sea Recovery Operations Pilot Program
[Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, § 11504], Dec. 23, 2022, [136 Stat. 4131], provided that:“(a)
In General.—
The Secretary shall conduct a pilot program to evaluate the potential use of remotely controlled or autonomous operation and monitoring of certain vessels for the purposes of—
“(1)
better understanding the complexities of such at-sea operations and potential risks to navigation safety, vessel security, maritime workers, the public, and the environment;
“(2)
gathering observational and performance data from monitoring the use of remotely-controlled or autonomous vessels; and
“(3)
assessing and evaluating regulatory requirements necessary to guide the development of future occurrences of such operations and monitoring activities.
“(b)
Duration and Effective Date.—
The duration of the pilot program established under this section shall be not more than 5 years beginning on the date on which the pilot program is established, which shall be not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 23, 2022].
“(c)
Authorized Activities.—
The activities authorized under this section include—
“(1)
remote over-the-horizon monitoring operations related to the active at-sea recovery of spaceflight components on an unmanned vessel or platform;
“(2)
procedures for the unaccompanied operation and monitoring of an unmanned spaceflight recovery vessel or platform; and
“(3)
unmanned vessel transits and testing operations without a physical tow line related to space launch and recovery operations, except within 12 nautical miles of a port.
“(d)
Interim Authority.—
In recognition of potential risks to navigation safety, vessel security, maritime workers, the public, and the environment, and the unique circumstances requiring the use of remotely operated or autonomous vessels, the Secretary, in the pilot program established under subsection (a), may—
“(1)
allow remotely controlled or autonomous vessel operations to proceed consistent to the extent practicable under the proposed title 33, United States Code [sic], and 46, United States Code, including navigation and manning laws and regulations;
“(2)
modify or waive applicable regulations and guidance as the Secretary considers appropriate to—
“(A)
allow remote and autonomous vessel at-sea operations and activities to occur while ensuring navigation safety; and
“(B)
ensure the reliable, safe, and secure operation of remotely-controlled or autonomous vessels; and
“(3)
require each remotely operated or autonomous vessel to be at all times under the supervision of 1 or more individuals—
“(A)
holding a merchant mariner credential which is suitable to the satisfaction of the Coast Guard; and
“(B)
who shall practice due regard for the safety of navigation of the autonomous vessel, to include collision avoidance.
“(e)
Rule of Construction.—
Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the Secretary to—
“(1)
permit foreign vessels to participate in the pilot program established under subsection (a);
“(2)
waive or modify applicable laws and regulations under the proposed title 33, United States Code [sic], and title 46, United States Code, except to the extent authorized under subsection (d)(2);
“(3)
waive or modify applicable laws and regulations under titles 49 and 51 of the United States Code; or
“(4)
waive or modify any regulations arising under international conventions.
“(f)
Savings Provision.—
Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize the employment in the coastwise trade of a vessel or platform that does not meet the requirements of sections 12112, 55102, 55103, and 55111 of title 46, United States Code.
“(g)
Authority Unaffected.—
Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect, impinge, or alter any authority of the Secretary of Transportation under titles 49 and 51, United States Code.
“(h)
Briefings.—
The Secretary or the designee of the Secretary shall brief the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives on the program established under subsection (a) on a quarterly basis.
“(i)
Report.—
Not later than 180 days after the expiration of the pilot program established under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a final report regarding an assessment of the execution of the pilot program and implications for maintaining navigation safety, the safety of maritime workers, and the preservation of the environment.
“(j)
GAO Report.—
“(1)
In general.—
Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this section [Dec. 23, 2022], the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the state of autonomous and remote technologies in the operation of shipboard equipment and the safe and secure navigation of vessels in Federal waters of the United States.
“(2)
Elements.—
The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
“(A)
An assessment of commercially available autonomous and remote technologies in the operation of shipboard equipment and the safe and secure navigation of vessels during the 10 years immediately preceding the date of the report.
“(B)
An analysis of the safety, physical security, cybersecurity, and collision avoidance risks and benefits associated with autonomous and remote technologies in the operation of shipboard equipment and the safe and secure navigation of vessels, including environmental considerations.
“(C)
An assessment of the impact of such autonomous and remote technologies, and all associated technologies, on labor, including—
“(i)
roles for credentialed and noncredentialed workers regarding such autonomous, remote, and associated technologies; and
“(ii)
training and workforce development needs associated with such technologies.
“(D)
An assessment and evaluation of regulatory requirements necessary to guide the development of future autonomous, remote, and associated technologies in the operation of shipboard equipment and safe and secure navigation of vessels.
“(E)
An assessment of the extent to which such technologies are being used in other countries and how such countries have regulated such technologies.
“(F)
Recommendations regarding authorization, infrastructure, and other requirements necessary for the implementation of such technologies in the United States.
“(3)
Consultation.—
The report required under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, consultation with the maritime industry including—
“(A)
vessel operators, including commercial carriers, entities engaged in exploring for, developing, or producing resources, including non-mineral energy resources in its offshore areas, and supporting entities in the maritime industry;
“(B)
shipboard personnel impacted by any change to autonomous vessel operations, in order to assess the various benefits and risks associated with the implementation of autonomous, remote, and associated technologies in the operation of shipboard equipment and safe and secure navigation of vessels and the impact such technologies would have on maritime jobs and maritime manpower;
“(C)
relevant federally funded research institutions, non-governmental organizations, and academia; and
“(D)
the commercial space industry.
“(k)
Merchant Mariner Credential Defined.—
In this section, the term ‘merchant mariner credential’ means a merchant mariner license, certificate, or document that the Secretary is authorized to issue pursuant to title 46, United States Code.”
[For definition of “Secretary” as used in [section 11504 of Pub. L. 117–263], set out above, see [section 11002 of Pub. L. 117–263], set out as a note under section 106 of this title.]
Conveyance of Coast Guard Vessels for Public Purposes
[Pub. L. 111–281, title IX, § 914], Oct. 15, 2010, [124 Stat. 3018], which provided for transfer of a Coast Guard vessel or aircraft to an eligible entity for public purposes when authorized by law or declared excess by the Commandant of the Coast Guard, was redesignated as section 510 of this title and transferred to appear after section 509 of this title by [Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXII, § 11258(a)], Dec. 23, 2022, [136 Stat. 4057].
Implementation of International Agreements
[Pub. L. 109–241, title VIII, § 801], July 11, 2006, [120 Stat. 562], provided that: “In consultation with appropriate Federal agencies, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall work with the responsible officials and agencies of other nations to accelerate efforts at the International Maritime Organization to enhance oversight and enforcement of security, environmental, and other agreements adopted within the International Maritime Organization by flag States on whom such agreements are binding, including implementation of—“(1)
a code outlining flag State responsibilities and obligations;
“(2)
an audit regime for evaluating flag State performance;
“(3)
measures to ensure that responsible organizations, acting on behalf of flag States, meet established performance standards; and
“(4)
cooperative arrangements to improve enforcement on a bilateral, regional, or international basis.”
Voluntary Measures for Reducing Pollution From Recreational Boats
[Pub. L. 109–241, title VIII, § 802], July 11, 2006, [120 Stat. 563], provided that: “In consultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local government agencies, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall undertake outreach programs for educating the owners and operators of boats using two-stroke engines about the pollution associated with such engines and support voluntary programs that reduce such pollution and encourage the early replacement of older two-stroke engines.”
Great Lakes Lighthouses
[Pub. L. 107–295, title III, § 345], Nov. 25, 2002, [116 Stat. 2106], provided that:“(a)
Findings.—
The Congress finds the following:
“(1)
The Great Lakes are home to more than 400 lighthouses. One hundred and twenty of these maritime landmarks are in the State of Michigan.
“(2)
Lighthouses are an important part of Great Lakes culture and stand as a testament to the importance of shipping in the region’s political, economic, and social history.
“(3)
Advances in navigation technology have made many Great Lakes lighthouses obsolete. In Michigan alone, approximately 70 lighthouses will be designated as excess property of the Federal Government and will be transferred to the General Services Administration for disposal.
“(4)
Unfortunately, the Federal property disposal process is confusing, complicated, and not well-suited to disposal of historic lighthouses or to facilitate transfers to nonprofit organizations. This is especially troubling because, in many cases, local nonprofit historical organizations have dedicated tremendous resources to preserving and maintaining Great Lakes lighthouses.
“(5)
If Great Lakes lighthouses disappear, the public will be unaware of an important chapter in Great Lakes history.
“(6)
The National Trust for Historic Preservation has placed Michigan lighthouses on their list of Most Endangered Historic Places.
“(b)
Assistance for Great Lakes Lighthouse Preservation Efforts.—
The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, may—
“(1)
continue to offer advice and technical assistance to organizations in the Great Lakes region that are dedicated to lighthouse stewardship; and
“(2)
promptly release information regarding the timing of designations of Coast Guard lighthouses on the Great Lakes as excess to the needs of the Coast Guard, to enable those organizations to mobilize and be prepared to take appropriate action with respect to the disposal of those properties.”
VHF Communications Services
[Pub. L. 107–295, title IV, § 406], Nov. 25, 2002, [116 Stat. 2116], which permitted the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating to authorize placement of commercial VHF communications equipment on real property under the administrative control of the Coast Guard, was redesignated as section 720 of this title and transferred to appear after section 719 of this title by [Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV] [LXXXV], § 8501(a)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, [134 Stat. 4745].
Purchase of American-Made Equipment and Products; Notice to Recipients of Assistance
[Pub. L. 104–324, title XI, § 1127], Oct. 19, 1996, [110 Stat. 3983], provided that:“(a)
Purchase of American-Made Equipment and Products.—
It is the sense of the Congress that, to the greatest extent practicable, all equipment and products purchased with funds made available under this Act [see Tables for classification] should be American-made.
“(b)
Notice to Recipients of Assistance.—
In providing financial assistance under this Act, the official responsible for providing the assistance, to the greatest extent practicable, shall provide to each recipient of the assistance a notice describing the statement made in subsection (a) by the Congress.”
Coast Guard Vessel Design
[Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, § 4203], Aug. 18, 1990, [104 Stat. 532], provided that: “The Secretary shall ensure that vessels designed and constructed to replace Coast Guard buoy tenders are equipped with oil skimming systems that are readily available and operable, and that complement the primary mission of servicing aids to navigation.”
Authorization of Junior Reserve Officers Training Program Pilot Program
[Pub. L. 101–225, title II, § 204], Dec. 12, 1989, [103 Stat. 1911], provided that:“(a)
In General.—
The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ‘Secretary’) may carry out a pilot program to establish and maintain a junior reserve officers training program in cooperation with the Dade County Public School System of Dade County, Florida, as part of the Maritime and Science Technology Academy established by that school system (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ‘Academy’).
“(b)
Program Requirements.—
A pilot program carried out by the Secretary under this section—
“(1)
shall be known as the ‘Claude Pepper Junior Reserve Officers Training Program’, and
“(2)
shall provide to students at the Academy—
“(A)
instruction in subject areas relating to operations of the Coast Guard; and
“(B)
training in skills which are useful and appropriate for a career in the Coast Guard.
“(c)
Provision of Additional Support.—
To carry out a pilot program under this section, the Secretary may provide to the Academy—
“(1)
assistance in course development, instruction, and other support activities;
“(2)
commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the Coast Guard to serve as administrators and instructors; and
“(3)
necessary and appropriate course materials, equipment, and uniforms.
“(d)
Employment of Retired Coast Guard Personnel.—
“(1)
In general.—
Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, the Secretary may authorize the Academy to employ as administrators and instructors for the pilot program retired Coast Guard and Coast Guard Reserve commissioned, warrant, and petty officers who request that employment and who are approved by the Secretary and the Academy.
“(2)
Authorized pay.—
(A)
Retired members employed under paragraph (1) of this subsection are entitled to receive their retired or retainer pay and an additional amount of not more than the difference between—
“(i)
the amount the individual would be paid as pay and allowance if they were considered to have been ordered to active duty during that period of employment; and
“(ii)
the amount of retired pay the individual is entitled to receive during that period.
“(B)
The Secretary shall pay to the Academy an amount equal to one half of the amount described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, from funds appropriated for that purpose.
“(C)
Notwithstanding any other law, while employed under this subsection, an individual is not considered to be on active duty or inactive duty training.”
Consideration of Maritime Administration Vessels
[Pub. L. 101–225, title II, § 213], Dec. 12, 1989, [103 Stat. 1914], provided that: “Before acquiring a vessel for use by the Coast Guard, the Secretary of Transportation or the Commandant of the Coast Guard, as appropriate, shall review the inventory of vessels acquired by the Secretary or the Secretary of Commerce as the result of a default under title XI of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 ([former] 46 App. U.S.C. 1271–1279c) [see 46 U.S.C. 53701 et seq.], to determine whether any of those vessels are suitable for use by the Coast Guard.”
Lifesaving Equipment on Passenger Ferries
[Pub. L. 98–557, § 10], Oct. 30, 1984, [98 Stat. 2863], provided that: “The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall proceed vigorously with efforts to develop improved lifesaving equipment for use on passenger ferries.”
Aircraft
Provisions specifying the maximum number of aircraft on hand at any one time, exclusive of planes and parts stored to meet future attrition, were contained in the following appropriation acts:
[Pub. L. 105–66, title I], Oct. 27, 1997, [111 Stat. 1426].
[Pub. L. 104–205, title I], Sept. 30, 1996, [110 Stat. 2953].
[Pub. L. 104–50, title I], Nov. 15, 1995, [109 Stat. 438].
[Pub. L. 103–331, title I], Sept. 30, 1994, [108 Stat. 2473].
[Pub. L. 103–122, title I], Oct. 27, 1993, [107 Stat. 1201].
[Pub. L. 102–388, title I], Oct. 6, 1992, [106 Stat. 1523].
[Pub. L. 102–143, title I], Oct. 28, 1991, [105 Stat. 920].
[Pub. L. 101–516, title I], Nov. 5, 1990, [104 Stat. 2158].
[Pub. L. 101–164, title I], Nov. 21, 1989, [103 Stat. 1071].
[Pub. L. 100–457, title I], Sept. 30, 1988, [102 Stat. 2126].
[Pub. L. 100–202, § 101](l) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, [101 Stat. 1329–358], 1329–359.
[Pub. L. 99–500, § 101](l) [H.R. 5205, title I], Oct. 18, 1986, [100 Stat. 1783–308], and [Pub. L. 99–591, § 101](l), Oct. 30, 1986, [100 Stat. 3341–308].
[Pub. L. 99–190, § 101(e) [title I]], Dec. 19, 1985, [99 Stat. 1267], 1269.
[Pub. L. 98–473, title I, § 101(i) [title I]], Oct. 12, 1984, [98 Stat. 1944], 1945.
[Pub. L. 98–78, title I], Aug. 15, 1983, [97 Stat. 454].
[Pub. L. 97–369, title I], Dec. 18, 1982, [96 Stat. 1766].
[Pub. L. 97–102, title I], Dec. 23, 1981, [95 Stat. 1443].
[Pub. L. 96–400, title I], Oct. 9, 1980, [94 Stat. 1681].
[Pub. L. 96–131, title I], Nov. 30, 1979, [93 Stat. 1023].
[Pub. L. 95–335, title I], Aug. 4, 1978, [92 Stat. 435].
[Pub. L. 95–85, title I], Aug. 2, 1977, [91 Stat. 402].
[Pub. L. 94–387, title I], Aug. 14, 1976, [90 Stat. 1172].
[Pub. L. 94–134, title I], Nov. 24, 1975, [89 Stat. 696].
[Pub. L. 93–391, title I], Aug. 28, 1974, [88 Stat. 769].
[Pub. L. 93–98, title I], Aug. 16, 1973, [87 Stat. 330].
[Pub. L. 92–398, title I], Aug. 22, 1972, [86 Stat. 581].
[Pub. L. 92–74, title I], Aug. 10, 1971, [85 Stat. 202].
[Pub. L. 91–168, title I], Dec. 26, 1969, [83 Stat. 454].
[Pub. L. 90–464, title I], Aug. 8, 1968, [82 Stat. 654].
[Pub. L. 90–112, title II], Oct. 23, 1967, [81 Stat. 312].
[Pub. L. 89–474, title I], June 29, 1966, [80 Stat. 223].
[Pub. L. 89–57, title I], June 30, 1965, [79 Stat. 197].
[Pub. L. 88–392, title I], Aug. 1, 1964, [78 Stat. 369].
[Pub. L. 88–39, title I], June 13, 1963, [77 Stat. 59].
[Pub. L. 87–575, title I], Aug. 6, 1962, [76 Stat. 311].
[Pub. L. 87–159, title I], Aug. 21, 1961, [75 Stat. 395].
[Pub. L. 86–561, title I], June 30, 1960, [74 Stat. 285].
[Pub. L. 86–39, title I], June 11, 1959, [73 Stat. 67].
[Pub. L. 85–354, title I], Mar. 28, 1958, [72 Stat. 62].
[Pub. L. 85–37, title I], May 27, 1957, [71 Stat. 37].
[Apr. 2, 1956, ch. 161], title I, [70 Stat. 93].
[June 1, 1955, ch. 113], title I, [69 Stat. 74].
[May 28, 1954, ch. 242], title I, [68 Stat. 146].
[June 18, 1953, ch. 132], title I, [67 Stat. 69].
[June 30, 1952, ch. 523], title I, [66 Stat. 291].
[Aug. 11, 1951, ch. 301], title I, [65 Stat. 185].
[Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896], Ch. IV, title I, [64 Stat. 639].
[June 30, 1949, ch. 286], title I, [63 Stat. 367].
[June 19, 1948, ch. 558], title I, [62 Stat. 563].
[July 1, 1947, ch. 186], title I, [61 Stat. 227].
[July 12, 1946, ch. 569, § 1], [60 Stat. 531].