19 USC 1675 - Administrative review of determinations

U.S Code last checked for updates: Nov 22, 2024

§ 1675.

Administrative review of determinations

(a)

Periodic review of amount of duty

(1)

In general

At least once during each 12-month period beginning on the anniversary of the date of publication of a countervailing duty order under this subtitle or under section 1303 1

 See References in Text note below.

of this title, an antidumping duty order under this subtitle or a finding under the Antidumping Act, 1921, or a notice of the suspension of an investigation, the administering authority, if a request for such a review has been received and after publication of notice of such review in the Federal Register, shall—

(A)

review and determine the amount of any net countervailable subsidy,

(B)

review, and determine (in accordance with paragraph (2)), the amount of any antidumping duty, and

(C)

review the current status of, and compliance with, any agreement by reason of which an investigation was suspended, and review the amount of any net countervailable subsidy or dumping margin involved in the agreement,

and shall publish in the Federal Register the results of such review, together with notice of any duty to be assessed, estimated duty to be deposited, or investigation to be resumed.

(2)

Determination of antidumping duties

(A)

In general

For the purpose of paragraph (1)(B), the administering authority shall determine—

(i)

the normal value and export price (or constructed export price) of each entry of the subject merchandise, and

(ii)

the dumping margin for each such entry.

(B)

Determination of antidumping or countervailing duties for new exporters and producers

(i)

In general

If the administering authority receives a request from an exporter or producer of the subject merchandise establishing that—

(I)

such exporter or producer did not export the merchandise that was the subject of an antidumping duty or countervailing duty order to the United States (or, in the case of a regional industry, did not export the subject merchandise for sale in the region concerned) during the period of investigation, and

(II)

such exporter or producer is not affiliated (within the meaning of section 1677(33) of this title) with any exporter or producer who exported the subject merchandise to the United States (or in the case of a regional industry, who exported the subject merchandise for sale in the region concerned) during that period,

the administering authority shall conduct a review under this subsection to establish an individual weighted average dumping margin or an individual countervailing duty rate (as the case may be) for such exporter or producer.

(ii)

Time for review under clause (i)

The administering authority shall commence a review under clause (i) in the calendar month beginning after—

(I)

the end of the 6-month period beginning on the date of the countervailing duty or antidumping duty order under review, or

(II)

the end of any 6-month period occurring thereafter,

if the request for the review is made during that 6-month period.

(iii)

Time limits

(iv)

Determinations based on bona fide sales

Any weighted average dumping margin or individual countervailing duty rate determined for an exporter or producer in a review conducted under clause (i) shall be based solely on the bona fide United States sales of an exporter or producer, as the case may be, made during the period covered by the review. In determining whether the United States sales of an exporter or producer made during the period covered by the review were bona fide, the administering authority shall consider, depending on the circumstances surrounding such sales—

(I)

the prices of such sales;

(II)

whether such sales were made in commercial quantities;

(III)

the timing of such sales;

(IV)

the expenses arising from such sales;

(V)

whether the subject merchandise involved in such sales was resold in the United States at a profit;

(VI)

whether such sales were made on an arms-length basis; and

(VII)

any other factor the administering authority determines to be relevant as to whether such sales are, or are not, likely to be typical of those the exporter or producer will make after completion of the review.

(C)

Results of determinations

(3)

Time limits

(A)

Preliminary and final determinations

(B)

Liquidation of entries

(C)

Effect of pending review under section 1516a

(4)

Absorption of antidumping duties

(b)

Reviews based on changed circumstances

(1)

In general

Whenever the administering authority or the Commission receives information concerning, or a request from an interested party for a review of—

(A)

a final affirmative determination that resulted in an antidumping duty order under this subtitle or a finding under the Antidumping Act, 1921, or in a countervailing duty order under this subtitle or section 1303 ¹ of this title,

(B)

a suspension agreement accepted under section 1671c or 1673c of this title, or

(C)

a final affirmative determination resulting from an investigation continued pursuant to section 1671c(g) or 1673c(g) of this title,

which shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of such determination or agreement, the administering authority or the Commission (as the case may be) shall conduct a review of the determination or agreement after publishing notice of the review in the Federal Register.

(2)

Commission review

In conducting a review under this subsection, the Commission shall—

(A)

in the case of a countervailing duty order or antidumping duty order or finding, determine whether revocation of the order or finding is likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury,

(B)

in the case of a determination made pursuant to section 1671c(h)(2) or 1673c(h)(2) of this title, determine whether the suspension agreement continues to eliminate completely the injurious effects of imports of the subject merchandise, and

(C)

in the case of an affirmative determination resulting from an investigation continued under section 1671c(g) or 1673c(g) of this title, determine whether termination of the suspended investigation is likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury.

(3)

Burden of persuasion

During a review conducted by the Commission under this subsection—

(A)

the party seeking revocation of an order or finding described in paragraph (1)(A) shall have the burden of persuasion with respect to whether there are changed circumstances sufficient to warrant such revocation, and

(B)

the party seeking termination of a suspended investigation or a suspension agreement shall have the burden of persuasion with respect to whether there are changed circumstances sufficient to warrant such termination.

(4)

Limitation on period for review

In the absence of good cause shown—

(A)

the Commission may not review a determination made under section 1671d(b) or 1673d(b) of this title, or an investigation suspended under section 1671c or 1673c of this title, and

(B)

the administering authority may not review a determination made under section 1671d(a) or 1673d(a) of this title, or an investigation suspended under section 1671c or 1673c of this title,

less than 24 months after the date of publication of notice of that determination or suspension.

(c)

Five-year review

(1)

In general

Notwithstanding subsection (b) and except in the case of a transition order defined in paragraph (6), 5 years after the date of publication of—

(A)

a countervailing duty order (other than a countervailing duty order to which subparagraph (B) applies or which was issued without an affirmative determination of injury by the Commission under section 1303 ¹ of this title), an antidumping duty order, or a notice of suspension of an investigation, described in subsection (a)(1),

(B)

a notice of injury determination under section 1675b of this title with respect to a countervailing duty order, or

(C)

a determination under this section to continue an order or suspension agreement,

the administering authority and the Commission shall conduct a review to determine, in accordance with section 1675a of this title, whether revocation of the countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of the investigation suspended under section 1671c or 1673c of this title would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.

(2)

Notice of initiation of review

Not later than 30 days before the fifth anniversary of the date described in paragraph (1), the administering authority shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of a review under this subsection and request that interested parties submit—

(A)

a statement expressing their willingness to participate in the review by providing information requested by the administering authority and the Commission,

(B)

a statement regarding the likely effects of revocation of the order or termination of the suspended investigation, and

(C)

such other information or industry data as the administering authority or the Commission may specify.

(3)

Responses to notice of initiation

(A)

No response

(B)

Inadequate response

(4)

Waiver of participation by certain interested parties

(A)

In general

(B)

Effect of waiver

(5)

Conduct of review

(A)

Time limits for completion of review

(B)

Extension of time limit

(C)

Extraordinarily complicated

For purposes of this subsection, the administering authority or the Commission (as the case may be) may treat a review as extraordinarily complicated if—

(i)

there is a large number of issues,

(ii)

the issues to be considered are complex,

(iii)

there is a large number of firms involved,

(iv)

the orders or suspended investigations have been grouped as described in subparagraph (D), or

(v)

it is a review of a transition order.

(D)

Grouped reviews

(6)

Special transition rules

(A)

Schedule for reviews of transition orders

(i)

Initiation

(ii)

Completion

(iii)

Subsequent reviews

(iv)

Revocation and termination

(B)

Sequence of transition reviews

(C)

“Transition order” defined

For purposes of this section, the term “transition order” means—

(i)

a countervailing duty order under this subtitle or under section 1303 ¹ of this title,

(ii)

an antidumping duty order under this subtitle or a finding under the Antidumping Act, 1921, or

(iii)

a suspension of an investigation under section 1671c or 1673c of this title,

which is in effect on the date the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States.

(D)

Issue date for transition orders

(7)

Exclusions from computations

(A)

In general

(B)

Application of exclusion

(d)

Revocation of order or finding; termination of suspended investigation

(1)

In general

(2)

Five-year reviews

In the case of a review conducted under subsection (c), the administering authority shall revoke a countervailing duty order or an antidumping duty order or finding, or terminate a suspended investigation, unless—

(A)

the administering authority makes a determination that dumping or a countervailable subsidy, as the case may be, would be likely to continue or recur, and

(B)

the Commission makes a determination that material injury would be likely to continue or recur as described in section 1675a(a) of this title.

(3)

Application of revocation or termination

(e)

Hearings

(f)

Determination that basis for suspension no longer exists

(g)

Reviews to implement results of subsidies enforcement proceeding

(1)

Violations of article 8 of the subsidies agreement

If—

(A)

the administering authority receives notice from the Trade Representative of a violation of Article 8 of the Subsidies Agreement,

(B)

the administering authority has reason to believe that merchandise subject to an existing countervailing duty order or suspended investigation is benefiting from the subsidy or subsidy program found to have been in violation of Article 8 of the Subsidies Agreement, and

(C)

no review pursuant to subsection (a)(1) is in progress,

the administering authority shall conduct a review of the order or suspended investigation to determine whether the subject merchandise benefits from the subsidy or subsidy program found to have been in violation of Article 8 of the Subsidies Agreement. If the administering authority determines that the subject merchandise is benefiting from the subsidy or subsidy program, it shall make appropriate adjustments in the estimated duty to be deposited or appropriate revisions to the terms of the suspension agreement.

(2)

Withdrawal of subsidy or imposition of countermeasures

If the Trade Representative notifies the administering authority that, pursuant to Article 4 or Article 7 of the Subsidies Agreement—

(A)

(i)

the United States has imposed countermeasures, and

(ii)

such countermeasures are based on the effects in the United States of imports of merchandise that is the subject of a countervailing duty order, or

(B)

a WTO member country has withdrawn a countervailable subsidy provided with respect to merchandise subject to a countervailing duty order,

the administering authority shall conduct a review to determine if the amount of the estimated duty to be deposited should be adjusted or the order should be revoked.

(3)

Expedited review

(h)

Correction of ministerial errors

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, § 751, as added Pub. L. 96–39, title I, § 101, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 175; amended Pub. L. 98–573, title VI, § 611(a)(2), (3), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3031; Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, § 1886(a)(8), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2922; Pub. L. 100–418, title I, § 1333(b), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1209; Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §§ 220(a), 283(c), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4857, 4930; Pub. L. 106–36, title II, § 2410, June 25, 1999, 113 Stat. 171; Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, § 433, Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 171.)

cite as: 19 USC 1675