(A)
Required programs.—
High-range States shall use grant funds for—
(i)
high-visibility enforcement efforts; and
(ii)
any of the activities described in subparagraph (B) if—
(I)
the activity is described in the statewide plan; and
(II)
the Secretary approves the use of funding for such activity.
(B)
Authorized programs.—
Medium-range and low-range States may use grant funds for—
(i)
any of the purposes described in subparagraph (A);
(ii)
hiring a full-time or part-time impaired driving coordinator of the State’s activities to address the enforcement and adjudication of laws regarding driving while impaired by alcohol, drugs, or the combination of alcohol and drugs;
(iii)
court support of impaired driving prevention efforts, including—
(I)
hiring criminal justice professionals, including law enforcement officers, prosecutors, traffic safety resource prosecutors, judges, judicial outreach liaisons, and probation officers;
(II)
training and education of those professionals to assist the professionals in preventing impaired driving and handling impaired driving cases, including by providing compensation to a law enforcement officer to carry out safety grant activities to replace a law enforcement officer who is receiving drug recognition expert training or participating as an instructor in that drug recognition expert training; and
(III)
establishing driving while intoxicated courts;
(iv)
alcohol ignition interlock programs;
(v)
improving blood alcohol and drug concentration screening and testing, detection of potentially impairing drugs (including through the use of oral fluid as a specimen), and reporting relating to testing and detection;
(vi)
paid and earned media in support of high-visibility enforcement efforts, conducting initial and continuing standardized field sobriety training, advanced roadside impaired driving evaluation training, law enforcement phlebotomy training, and drug recognition expert training for law enforcement, and equipment and related expenditures used in connection with impaired driving enforcement in accordance with criteria established by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration;
(vii)
training on the use of alcohol and drug screening and brief intervention;
(viii)
training for and implementation of impaired driving assessment programs or other tools designed to increase the probability of identifying the recidivism risk of a person convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of alcohol and drugs and to determine the most effective mental health or substance abuse treatment or sanction that will reduce such risk;
(ix)
developing impaired driving information systems;
(x)
costs associated with a 24-7 sobriety program; and
(xi)
testing and implementing programs, and purchasing technologies, to better identify, monitor, or treat impaired drivers, including—
(I)
oral fluid-screening technologies;
(II)
electronic warrant programs;
(III)
equipment to increase the scope, quantity, quality, and timeliness of forensic toxicology chemical testing;
(IV)
case management software to support the management of impaired driving offenders; and
(V)
technology to monitor impaired-driving offenders, and equipment and related expenditures used in connection with impaired-driving enforcement in accordance with criteria established by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
(C)
Other programs.—
(i)
Low-range states.—
Subject to clause (iii), low-range States may use grant funds for any expenditure designed to reduce impaired driving based on problem identification and may use not more than 50 percent of funds made available under this subsection for any project or activity eligible for funding under section 402.
(ii)
Medium-range and high-range states.—
Subject to clause (iii), medium-range and high-range States may use funds for any expenditure designed to reduce impaired driving based on problem identification upon approval by the Secretary.
(iii)
Reporting and impaired driving measures.—
A State may use grant funds for any expenditure relating to—
(I)
increasing the timely and accurate reporting to Federal, State, and local databases of—
(aa)
crash information, including electronic crash reporting systems that allow accurate real- or near-real-time uploading of crash information; and
(bb)
impaired driving criminal justice information; or
(II)
researching or evaluating impaired driving countermeasures.