Historical and Revision Notes
Pub. L. 103–272
Revised Section	Source (U.S. Code)	Source (Statutes at Large)
44701(a)	49 App.:1421(a).	Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, §§ 601(a), (b) (1st sentence related to standards, rules, and regulations, last sentence), (c), 604(a) (related to standards), 72 Stat. 775, 778.
	49 App.:1655(c)(1).	Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, § 6(c)(1), 80 Stat. 938; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–449, § 7(b), 96 Stat. 2444.
44701(b)	49 App.:1424(a) (related to standards).
	49 App.:1432(a) (related to standards).	Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, § 612(a) (related to standards); added May 21, 1970, Pub. L. 91–258, § 51(b)(1), 84 Stat. 234; restated Sept. 3, 1982, Pub. L. 97–248, § 525(a), 96 Stat. 697.
	49 App.:1655(c)(1).
44701(c)	49 App.:1421(b) (last sentence).
	49 App.:1655(c)(1).
44701(d)	49 App.:1421(b) (1st sentence related to standards, rules, and regulations).
	49 App.:1655(c)(1).
44701(e)	49 App.:1421(c).
	49 App.:1655(c)(1).

In this section, the word “Administrator” in sections 601(a)–(c) and 604 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (Public Law 85–726, 72 Stat. 775, 778) is retained on authority of 49:106(g).

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words “is empowered and it . . . be his duty to” and “and revising from time to time” are omitted as surplus. In clause (1), the words “as may be” are omitted as surplus. In clauses (2)–(5), the words “Reasonable” and “reasonable” are omitted as surplus and the word “rules” is omitted as being synonymous with “regulations”. In clause (5), the words “to provide adequately” are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b)(1), the words “the operation of” are omitted as surplus. The words “under section 44705 of this title” are added for clarity.

In subsection (b)(2), the words “scheduled or unscheduled” are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (c), the words “carry out” are substituted for “exercise and perform his powers and duties under”, and the words “in carrying out” are substituted for “in the administration and enforcement of”, for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (d), before clause (1), the word “rules” is omitted as being synonymous with “regulations”. In clause (1), before subclause (A), the word “full” is omitted as surplus. In clause (1)(A), the word “provide” is substituted for “perform” for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (e), the words “from time to time” are omitted as surplus. The word “rule” is omitted as being synonymous with “regulation”.

Pub. L. 103–429

This amends 49:44701(d) and (e) to correct erroneous cross-references.

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2024—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 118–63, § 392(a)(1), inserted “cybersecurity,” after “quality of work,”.

Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 118–63, § 392(a)(2), inserted “cybersecurity and” after “standards for” and substituted “procedures” for “procedure”.

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 118–63, § 392(b), added subsec. (g).

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 118–63, § 822, added subsec. (h).

2018—Subsec. (e)(5). Pub. L. 115–254 added par. (5).

2000—Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 106–181 added subsec. (e) and redesignated former subsec. (e) as (f).

1994—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 103–429 substituted “any of sections 44702–44716” for “section 44702–44716”.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2000 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–181 applicable only to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as a note under section 106 of this title.

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–429 effective July 5, 1994, see section 9 of Pub. L. 103–429, set out as a note under section 321 of this title.

Scalability of Safety Management Systems

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 308, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1072, provided that: “In conducting any rulemaking to require, or implementing a regulation requiring, a safety management system, the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall consider the scalability of such safety management system requirements, to the full range of entities in terms of size or complexity that may be affected by such rulemaking or regulation, including—

“(1)

how an entity can demonstrate compliance using various documentation, tools, and methods, including, as appropriate, systems with multiple small operators collectively monitoring for and addressing risks;

“(2)

a review of traditional safety management techniques and the suitability of such techniques for small entities;

“(3)

the applicability of existing safety management system programs implemented by an entity;

“(4)

the suitability of existing requirements under part 5 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, for small entities; and

“(5)

other unique challenges relating to small entities the Administrator determines appropriate to consider.”

National Simulator Program Policies and Guidance

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 325, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1085, provided that:

“(a)

Review.—

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall review relevant policies and guidance, including all advisory circulars, information bulletins, and directives, pertaining to part 60 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(b)

Updates.—

Upon completion of the review required under subsection (a), the Administrator shall, at a minimum, update relevant policies and guidance, including all advisory circulars, information bulletins, and directives, pertaining to part 60 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(c)

Consultation.—

In carrying out the review required under subsection (a), the Administrator shall convene and consult with entities required to comply with part 60 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, including representatives of—

“(1)

air carriers;

“(2)

flight schools certificated under part 141 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations;

“(3)

training centers certificated under part 142 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; and

“(4)

manufacturers and suppliers of flight simulation training devices (as defined in part 1 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and Appendix F to part 60 of such title).

“(d)

GAO Study on FAA National Simulator Program.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General [of the United States] shall conduct a study on the National Simulator Program of the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] that is part of the Training and Simulation Group of the Air Transportation Division.

“(2)

Considerations.—

In conducting the study required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall, at a minimum, assess—

“(A)

how the program described in paragraph (1) is maintained to reflect and account for advancement in technologies pertaining to flight simulation training devices (as defined in part 1 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and appendix F to part 60 of such title);

“(B)

the staffing levels, critical competencies, and skills gaps of FAA personnel responsible for carrying out and supporting the program described in paragraph (1); and

“(C)

how the program described in paragraph (1) engages air carriers and relevant industry stakeholders, including flight schools, to ensure efficient compliance with part 60 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(3)

Report.—

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a report on the findings of the study conducted under paragraph (1).”

Aircraft Interchange Agreement Limitations

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 329, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1086, provided that:

“(a)

Study.—

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall conduct a study of foreign interchange agreements.

“(b)

Contents.—

In carrying out the study required under subsection (a), the Administrator shall address the following:

“(1)

Methods for updating regulations under part 121.569 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, for foreign interchange agreements.

“(2)

Time limits for foreign aircraft interchange agreements.

“(3)

Minimum breaks between foreign aircraft interchange agreements.

“(4)

Limits for no more than 1 foreign aircraft interchange agreement between 2 airlines.

“(5)

Limits for no more than 2 foreign aircraft on the interchange agreement.

“(c)

Briefing.—

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] on the results of the study required under subsection (a).

“(d)

Rulemaking.—

Based on the results of the study required under subsection (a), the Administrator may, if appropriate, update the relevant sections of part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.”

Tarmac Operations Monitoring Study

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 338, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1093, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

The Director of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in consultation with relevant offices within the Office of the Secretary [of Transportation] and the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] (as determined by the Secretary), shall conduct a study to explore the capture, storage, analysis, and feasibility of monitoring ground source data at airports.

“(b)

Objectives.—

The objectives of the study conducted under subsection (a) shall include the following:

“(1)

Determining the current state of ground source data coverage at airports.

“(2)

Understanding the technology requirements for monitoring ground movements at airports through sensors, receivers, or other technologies.

“(3)

Conducting data collection through a pilot program established under subsection (c) and collecting ground-based tarmac delay statistics.

“(4)

Performing an evaluation and feasibility analysis of potential system-level tarmac operations monitoring solutions.

“(c)

Pilot Program.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Director shall establish a pilot program to collect data and develop ground-based tarmac delay statistics or other relevant statistics with respect to airports.

“(2)

Requirements.—

The pilot program established under paragraph (1) shall—

“(A)

include up to 6 airports that the Director determines reflect a diversity of factors, including geography, size, and air traffic;

“(B)

terminate not more than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act; and

“(C)

be subject to any guidelines issued by the Director.

“(d)

Report.—

Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall publish the results of the study conducted under subsection (a) and the pilot program established under subsection (c) on a publicly available website.”

Improvements to Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Program

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 348, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1107, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall implement improvements to the Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Program with respect to safety data sharing and risk mitigation.

“(b)

Requirements.—

In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall—

“(1)

identify methods to increase the rate at which data is collected, processed, and analyzed to expeditiously share safety intelligence;

“(2)

develop predictive capabilities to anticipate emerging safety risks;

“(3)

identify methods to improve shared data environments with external stakeholders;

“(4)

establish a robust process for prioritizing requests for safety information;

“(5)

establish guidance to encourage regular safety inspector review of non-confidential aviation safety and performance data;

“(6)

identify industry segments not yet included and conduct outreach to such industry segments to increase the rate of participation, including—

“(A)

general aviation;

“(B)

air transportation and commercial aviation;

“(C)

rotorcraft operations;

“(D)

air ambulance operations; and

“(E)

aviation maintenance;

“(7)

establish processes for obtaining and analyzing comprehensive and aggregate data for new and future industry segments; and

“(8)

integrate safety data from unmanned aircraft system operators, as appropriate.

“(c)

Implementation.—

In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall—

“(1)

prioritize production-ready configurable solutions over custom development, as appropriate, to support FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] critical aviation safety programs; and

“(2)

ensure that adequate market research is completed in accordance with FAA acquisition management system requirements, including appropriate demonstrations of proposed solutions, as part of the evaluation criteria.

“(d)

Rule of Construction.—

Nothing in this section shall be construed—

“(1)

to require the Administrator to share confidential or proprietary information and data to safety inspectors for purposes of enforcement; or

“(2)

to limit the applicability of section 44735 of title 49, United States Code, to the Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Program.

“(e)

Briefing.—

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 6 months thereafter until the improvements under subsection (a) are made, the Administrator shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] on the progress of implementation of the Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Program, including—

“(1)

an assessment of the progress of the FAA toward achieving milestones for such program identified by the inspector general of the Department of Transportation and the Special Committee to Review FAA Aircraft Certification Reports;

“(2)

a description of the plan to use appropriate deployable commercial solutions to assist the FAA in meeting such milestones;

“(3)

steps taken to make improvements under subsection (b); and

“(4)

a summary of the efforts of the FAA to address gaps in safety data provided from any of the industry segments described in subsection (b)(6).”

Part 135 Duty and Rest

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 351, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1111, provided that:

“(a)

Part 91 Tail–end Ferry Rulemaking.—

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall require that any operation conducted by a flight crewmember during an assigned duty period under the operational control of an operator holding a certificate under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, before, during, or after the duty period (including any operations under part 91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations), without an intervening rest period, shall count towards the flight time and duty period limitations of such flight crewmember under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(b)

Record Keeping.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall update any Administration policy and guidance regarding complete and accurate record keeping practices for operators holding a certificate under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, in order to properly document, at a minimum—

“(1)

flight crew assignments;

“(2)

flight crew prospective rest notifications;

“(3)

compliance with flight and duty times limitations and post-duty rest requirements; and

“(4)

duty period start and end times.

“(c)

Safety Management System Oversight.—

The Administrator, in performing oversight of the safety management system of an operator holding a certificate under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, following the implementation of the final rule issued based on the final rule titled ‘Safety Management Systems’, and published on April 26, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 33068), shall ensure such operator is evaluating and appropriately mitigating aviation safety risks, including, at minimum, risks associated with—

“(1)

inadequate flight crewmember duty and rest periods; and

“(2)

incomplete records pertaining to flight crew rest, duty, and flight times.

“(d)

Organ Transportation Flights.—

In updating guidance and policy pursuant to subsection (b), the Administrator shall consider and allow for appropriate accommodations, including accommodations related to subsections (b)(2) and (b)(4) for operators—

“(1)

performing organ transportation operations; and

“(2)

who have in place a means by which to identify and mitigate risks associated with flight crew duty and rest.”

Ramp Worker Safety Call to Action

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 353, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1112, provided that:

“(a)

Call to Action Ramp Worker Safety Review.—

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall initiate a Call to Action safety review of airport ramp worker safety and ways to minimize or eliminate ingestion zone and jet blast zone accidents.

“(b)

Contents.—

The Call to Action safety review required pursuant to subsection (a) shall include—

“(1)

a description of Administration regulations, guidance, and directives related to airport ramp worker safety procedures and oversight of such processes;

“(2)

a description of reportable accidents and incidents involving airport ramp workers in 5-year period preceding the date of enactment of this Act, including any identified contributing factors to the reportable accident or incident;

“(3)

training and related educational materials for airport ramp workers, including supervisory and contract employees;

“(4)

any recommended devices and methods for communication on the airport ramp, including considerations of requirements for operable radios and headsets;

“(5)

a review of markings on the airport ramp that define restriction, staging, safety, or hazard zones, including markings to clearly define and graphically indicate the engine ingestion zones and envelope of safety for the variety of aircraft that may park at the same gate of the airport;

“(6)

a review of aircraft jet blast and engine intake safety markings, including incorporation of markings on aircraft to indicate engine inlet danger zones; and

“(7)

a process for stakeholders, including airlines, aircraft manufacturers, airports, labor, and aviation safety experts, to provide feedback and share best practices.

“(c)

Report and Actions.—

Not later than 180 days after the conclusion of the Call to Action safety review pursuant to subsection (a), the Administrator shall—

“(1)

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a report on the results of the review and any recommendations for actions or best practices to improve airport ramp worker safety, including the identification of risks and possible ways to mitigate such risks to be considered in any applicable safety management system of air carriers and airports; and

“(2)

initiate such actions as are necessary to act upon the findings of the review.

“(d)

Training Materials.—

Not later than 6 months after the completion of the safety review required under subsection (a), the Administrator shall develop and publish training and related educational materials about aircraft engine ingestion and jet blast hazards for ground crews, including supervisory and contract employees, that includes information on—

“(1)

the specific dangers and consequences of entering engine ingestion or jet blast zones;

“(2)

proper protocols to avoid entering an engine ingestion or jet blast zone; and

“(3)

on-the-job, instructor-led training to physically demonstrate the engine ingestion zone boundaries and jet blast zones for each kind of aircraft the ground crew may encounter.

“(e)

Consultation.—

In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall consult with aviation safety experts, air carriers, aircraft manufacturers, relevant labor organizations, and airport operators.

“(f)

Training Requirements.—

Not later than 6 months after the publication of the training and related educational materials required under subsection (d), the Administrator may require any ramp worker, as appropriate, to receive the relevant engine ingestion and jet blast zone hazard training before such ramp worker may perform work on any airport ramp.”

Modernization and Improvements to Aircraft Evacuation

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 365, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1132, provided that:

“(a)

Study.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall conduct a study on improvements to the safety and efficiency of evacuation standards for manufacturers and carriers of transport category airplanes, as described in parts 25 and 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(2)

Contents.—

“(A)

Requirements.—

The study required under paragraph (1) shall include—

“(i)

a prospective risk analysis, as well as an evaluation of relevant past incidents with respect to evacuation safety and evacuation standards;

“(ii)

an assessment of the evacuation testing procedures described in section 25.803 of such title 14, as well as recommendations for how to revise such testing procedures to ensure that the testing procedures assess, in a safe manner, the ability of passengers with disabilities, including passengers who use wheelchairs or other mobility assistive devices, to safely and efficiently evacuate an aircraft;

“(iii)

an assessment of the evacuation demonstration procedures described in such part 121, as well as recommendations for how to improve such demonstration procedures to ensure that the demonstration procedures assess, in a safe manner, the ability of passengers with disabilities, including passengers who use wheelchairs or other mobility assistive devices, to safely and efficiently evacuate an aircraft;

“(iv)

the research proposed in National Transportation Safety Board Safety Recommendation A–18–009; and

“(v)

any other analysis determined appropriate by the Administrator.

“(B)

Considerations.—

In conducting the study under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall assess the following:

“(i)

The ability of passengers of different ages (including infants, children, and senior citizens) to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(ii)

The ability of passengers of different heights and weights to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(iii)

The ability of passengers with disabilities to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(iv)

The ability of passengers who cannot speak, have difficulty speaking, use synthetic speech, or are non-vocal or non-verbal to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(v)

The ability of passengers who do not speak English to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(vi)

The impact of the presence of carry-on luggage and personal items (such as a purse, briefcase, laptop, or backpack) on the ability of passengers to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(vii)

The impact of seat size and passenger seating space and pitch on the ability of passengers to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(viii)

The impact of seats and other obstacles in the pathway to the exit opening from the nearest aisle on the ability of passengers to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(ix)

With respect to aircraft with parallel longitudinal aisles, the impact of seat pods or other seating configurations that block access between such aisles within a cabin on the ability of passengers to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(x)

The impact of passenger load on the ability of passengers to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(xi)

The impact of animals approved to accompany a passenger, including service animals, on the ability of passengers to safely and efficiently evacuate a transport category airplane.

“(xii)

Whether an applicant for a type certificate (as defined in section 44704(e)(7) of title 49, United States Code) should be required to demonstrate compliance with FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] emergency evacuation regulations (as described in section 25.803 and Appendix J of part 25 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations) through live testing in any case in which the Administrator determines that the new aircraft design is significant.

“(xiii)

Any other factor determined appropriate by the Administrator.

“(C)

Definitions.—

In this paragraph:

“(i)

Passenger load.—

The term ‘passenger load’ means the number of passengers relative to the number of seats onboard the aircraft.

“(ii)

Passengers with disabilities.—

The term ‘passengers with disabilities’ means any qualified individual with a disability, as defined in section 382.3 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(b)

Aviation Rulemaking Committee for Evacuation Standards.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 180 days after the completion of the study conducted under subsection (a), the Administrator shall establish an aviation rulemaking committee (in this section referred to as the ‘Committee’) to—

“(A)

review the findings of the study; and

“(B)

develop and submit to the Administrator recommendations regarding improvements to the evacuation standards described in parts 25 and 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(2)

Composition.—

The Committee shall consist of members appointed by the Administrator, including the following:

“(A)

Representatives of industry.

“(B)

Representatives of aviation labor organizations.

“(C)

Aviation safety experts with specific knowledge of the evacuation standards and requirements under such parts 25 and 121.

“(D)

Representatives of individuals with disabilities with specific knowledge of accessibility standards regarding evacuations in emergency circumstances.

“(E)

Representatives of the senior citizen community.

“(F)

Representatives of pediatricians.

“(3)

Considerations.—

In reviewing the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a) and developing recommendations regarding the improvement of the evacuation standards under subsection (b)(1)(B), the Committee shall consider the following:

“(A)

The recommendations made by any prior aviation rulemaking committee regarding the evacuation standards described in such parts 25 and 121.

“(B)

Scientific data derived from the study conducted under subsection (a).

“(C)

Any data gathered from aviation safety reporting programs.

“(D)

The cost-benefit analysis and risk analysis of any recommended standards.

“(E)

Any other item determined appropriate by the Committee.

“(c)

Report to Congress.—

Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Committee submits to the Administrator the recommendations under subsection (b)(1)(B), the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a report on—

“(1)

the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a);

“(2)

the recommendations of the Committee under subsection (b)(1)(B); and

“(3)

the Administrator’s plan, if any, to implement such recommendations.

“(d)

Rulemaking.—

Not later than 90 days after submitting to Congress the report under subsection (c), the Administrator shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to implement the recommendations of the Committee that the Administrator considers appropriate.”

25-Hour Cockpit Voice Recorder

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 366, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1135, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

“(1)

Cockpit voice recorder for newly manufactured aircraft.—

A covered operator may not operate a covered aircraft manufactured later than the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024] unless such aircraft has a cockpit voice recorder installed that retains the last 25 hours of recorded information using a recorder that meets the standards of Technical Standard Order TSO–C123c, or any later revision.

“(2)

Cockpit voice recorder for covered aircraft.—

Not later than 6 years after the date of enactment of this Act, a covered operator may not operate a covered aircraft unless such aircraft has a cockpit voice recorder installed that retains the last 25 hours of recorded information using a recorder that meets the standards of Technical Standard Order TSO–C123c, or any later revision.

“(b)

Prohibited Use.—

The Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] or any covered operator may not use a cockpit voice recorder recording for a certificate action, civil penalty, or disciplinary proceedings against a flight crewmember.

“(c)

Rulemaking.—

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall—

“(1)

issue a final rule to update applicable regulations, as necessary, to conform to the requirements of subsection (a)(2); and

“(2)

issue a rule to update applicable regulations, as necessary, to ensure, to the greatest extent practicable, that any data from a cockpit voice recorder—

“(A)

is protected from unlawful or unauthorized disclosure to the public;

“(B)

is used exclusively by a Federal agency or a foreign accident investigative agency for a criminal investigation, aircraft accident, or aircraft incident investigation; and

“(C)

is not deliberately erased or tampered with following a National Transportation Safety Board reportable event under part 830 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, for which civil and criminal penalties may be assessed in accordance with section 1155 of title 49, United States Code, and section 32 of title 18, United States Code.

“(d)

Savings Clause.—

Nothing in this section shall be construed as rescoping, constraining, or otherwise mandating delays to FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] actions in the notice of proposed rulemaking titled ‘25–Hour Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) Requirements, New Aircraft Production’, issued on December 4, 2023 (88 Fed. Reg. 84090).

“(e)

Rule of Construction.—

Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect—

“(1)

the confidentiality of recording and transcripts under section 1114(c) of title 49, United States Code;

“(2)

the ban on recording for civil penalty or certificate under section 121.359(h) of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; or

“(3)

the prohibition against use of data from flight operational quality assurance programs for enforcement purposes under section 13.401 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(f)

Definitions.—

In this section:

“(1)

Covered aircraft.—

The term ‘covered aircraft’ means—

“(A)

an aircraft operated by an air carrier under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; or

“(B)

a transport category aircraft designed for operations by an air carrier or foreign air carrier type-certificated with a passenger seating capacity of 30 or more or an all-cargo or combi derivative of such an aircraft.

“(2)

Covered operator.—

The term ‘covered operator’ means the operator of a covered aircraft.”

Staffing Model for Aviation Safety Inspectors; Safety-Critical Staffing

Pub. L. 118–63, title IV, §§ 430, 431, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1172, 1173, provided that:

“SEC. 430.

STAFFING MODEL FOR AVIATION SAFETY INSPECTORS.

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall review and, as necessary, revise the staffing model for aviation safety inspectors.

“(b)

Requirements.—

“(1)

Consideration of prior studies and reports.—

In reviewing and revising the model, the Administrator shall take into consideration the contents and recommendations contained in the following:

“(A)

The 2006 report released by the National Research Council titled ‘Staffing Standards for Aviation Safety Inspectors’.

“(B)

The 2007 study released by the National Academy of Sciences titled ‘Staffing Standards for Aviation Safety Inspectors’.

“(C)

The 2013 report released by Grant Thornton LLP, titled ‘ASTARS Gap Analysis Study: Comparison of the AVS Staffing Model for Aviation Safety Inspectors to the National Academy of Sciences’ Recommendations Final Report’.

“(D)

The 2021 report released by the inspector general of the Department of Transportation titled ‘FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] Can Increase Its Inspector Staffing Model’s Effectiveness by Implementing System Improvements and Maximizing Its Capabilities”.

“(E) The FAA Fiscal Year 2023 Aviation Safety Workforce Plan conducted to satisfy the requirements of section 104 of the Aircraft Certification, Safety, and Accountability Act, as enacted in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (49 U.S.C. 44701 note).

“(2) Assessments.—In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall assess the following:

“(A) Projected staffing needs at the service and office level.

“(B) Forecasted attrition of the aviation safety inspector workforce.

“(C) Forecasted workload of aviation safety inspectors, including responsibilities associated with overseeing aviation manufacturers and new airspace entrants.

“(D) Means by which field managers use the model to assess aviation safety inspector staffing and provide feedback on resources needed at the office level.

“(E) Work performed by aviation safety inspectors in comparison to designees acting on behalf of the Administrator.

“(F) Any associated performance metrics to inform periodic comparisons to actual aviation safety inspector staffing level results.

“(3) Consultation.—In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall consult with interested persons, including the exclusive collective bargaining representative for aviation safety inspectors certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code.

“SEC. 431. SAFETY-CRITICAL STAFFING.

“(a) Implementation of Staffing Standards for Safety Inspectors.—Upon completion of the revised staffing model for aviation safety inspectors under section 430, and validation of the model by the Administrator, the Administrator shall take all appropriate actions in response to the number of aviation safety inspectors, aviation safety technicians, and operation support positions that are identified in such model to meet the responsibilities of the Flight Standards Service and Aircraft Certification Service, including potentially increasing the number of safety critical positions in the Flight Standards Service and Aircraft Certification Service each fiscal year, as appropriate, so long as such staffing increases are measured relative to the number of individuals serving in safety-critical positions as of September 30, 2023.

“(b) Availability of Appropriations.—Any increase in safety critical staffing pursuant to this subsection shall be subject to the availability of appropriations.

“(c) Safety-critical Positions Defined.—In this section, the term ‘safety-critical positions’ means—

“(1) aviation safety inspectors, aviation safety specialists (1801 job series), aviation safety technicians, and operations support positions in the Flight Standards Service; and

“(2) manufacturing safety inspectors, pilots, engineers, Chief Scientist Technical Advisors, aviation safety specialists (1801 job series), safety technical specialists, and operational support positions in the Aircraft Certification Service.”

Deterring Crewmember Interference

Pub. L. 118–63, title IV, § 432, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1173, provided that:

“(a)

Task Force.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall convene a task force to develop voluntary standards and best practices relating to suspected violations of sections 46318, 46503, and 46504 of title 49, United States Code, including—

“(A)

proper and consistent incident documentation and reporting techniques;

“(B)

best practices for flight crew and cabin crew response, including de-escalation;

“(C)

improved coordination between stakeholders, including flight crew and cabin crew, airport staff, other Federal agencies as appropriate, and law enforcement; and

“(D)

appropriate enforcement actions.

“(2)

Membership.—

The task force convened under paragraph (1) shall be comprised of representatives of—

“(A)

air carriers;

“(B)

airport sponsors and airport law enforcement agencies;

“(C)

other Federal agencies determined necessary by the Administrator;

“(D)

labor organizations representing air carrier pilots;

“(E)

labor organizations representing flight attendants; and

“(F)

labor organizations representing ticketing, check-in, or other customer service representatives employed by air carriers.

“(b)

Announcements.—

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall initiate such actions as may be necessary to include in the briefing of passengers before takeoff required under section 121.571 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, a statement informing passengers that it is against Federal law to assault or threaten to assault any individual on an aircraft or interfere with the duties of a crewmember.

“(c)

Definitions.—

For purposes of this section, the definitions in section 40102(a) of title 49, United States Code, shall apply to terms in this section.”

Updating Passenger Information Requirement Regulations

Pub. L. 118–63, title V, § 518, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1199, provided that:

“(a)

ARAC Tasking.—

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall task the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee with—

“(1)

reviewing passenger information requirement regulations under section 121.317 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulation[s], and such other related regulations as the Administrator determines appropriate; and

“(2)

making recommendations to update and improve such regulations.

“(b)

Final Regulation.—

Not later than 6 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall issue a final regulation revising section 121.317 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and such other related regulations as the Administrator determines appropriate, to—

“(1)

update such section and regulations to incorporate exemptions commonly issued by the Administrator;

“(2)

reflect civil penalty inflation adjustments; and

“(3)

incorporate such updates and improvements recommended by the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee that the Administrator determines appropriate.”

Surface Surveillance

Pub. L. 118–63, title VI, § 617, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1229, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall conduct a review of surface surveillance systems that are operational as of such date of enactment.

“(b)

Contents.—

In carrying out the review under subsection (a), the Administrator shall—

“(1)

demonstrate that any change to the configuration of surface surveillance systems or decommissioning of a sensor from such systems provides an equivalent level of safety as the current system;

“(2)

determine how a technology refresh of legacy sensor equipment can reduce operational and maintenance costs of surface surveillance systems compared to current costs and extend the useful life and affordability of such systems; and

“(3)

consider how to enhance such systems through new capabilities and software tools that improve the safety of terminal airspace and the airport surface.

“(c)

Consultation.—

In carrying out the review under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consult with—

“(1)

aviation safety experts with specific knowledge of surface surveillance technology, including multilateration and automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast;

“(2)

representatives of the exclusive bargaining representative of the air traffic controllers certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code, with expertise in surface safety; and

“(3)

representatives of the exclusive bargaining representative of airway transportation systems specialists of the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code.

“(d)

Briefing.—

Upon completion of the review under subsection (a), the Administrator shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] on the findings of such review.

“(e)

Implementation.—

The Administrator may implement changes to surface surveillance systems consistent with the findings of the review described in subsection (d).”

Ensuring Safe Landings During Off-Airport Operations

Pub. L. 118–63, title VIII, § 809, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1325, provided that: “The Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall not apply section 91.119 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, in any manner that requires a pilot to continue a landing that is unsafe.”

Letter of Deviation Authority

Pub. L. 118–63, title VIII, § 814, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1327, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

A flight instructor, registered owner, lessor, or lessee of a covered aircraft shall not be required to obtain a letter of deviation authority from the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] to allow, conduct, or receive flight training, checking, and testing in such aircraft if—

“(1)

the flight instructor is not providing both the training and the aircraft;

“(2)

no person advertises or broadly offers the aircraft as available for flight training, checking, or testing; and

“(3)

no person receives compensation for use of the aircraft for a specific flight during which flight training, checking, or testing was received, other than expenses for owning, operating, and maintaining the aircraft.

“(b)

Covered Aircraft Defined.—

In this section, the term ‘covered aircraft’ means—

“(1)

an experimental category aircraft;

“(2)

a limited category aircraft; and

“(3)

a primary category aircraft.”

Consistency of Policy Application in Flight Standards and Aircraft Certification

Pub. L. 118–63, title VIII, § 821, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1330, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

The inspector general of the Department of Transportation shall initiate audits, as described in subsection (d), of the Flight Standards and Aircraft Certification Services of the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration], and the personnel of such offices, on the consistency of—

“(1)

the interpretation of policies, orders, guidance, and regulations; and

“(2)

the application of policies, orders, guidance, and regulations.

“(b)

Components.—

In completing the audits required under this section, the inspector general shall interview stakeholders, including at a minimum, individuals or entities that—

“(1)

hold a certificate or authorization related to the issue being audited under subsection (d);

“(2)

are from different regions of the country with matters before different flight standards district offices or before different FAA Flight Standards Service and Aircraft Certification Service offices;

“(3)

work with multiple flight standards district offices or aircraft certification offices of the Administration; or

“(4)

hold a single or multiple relevant certificates or authorizations.

“(c)

Reports.—

The inspector general of the Department of Transportation shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives], the Secretary [of Transportation], and the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] a report for each audit required in this section, containing the results of the audit, including findings and necessary recommendations to the Administrator to improve the consistency of decision-making by Flight Standards and Aircraft Certification Services offices of the Administration.

“(d)

Audits.—

The inspector general shall complete an audit and issue the associated report required under subsection (c) not later than—

“(1)

18 months after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], with regard to supplemental type certificates;

“(2)

34 months after the date of enactment of this Act, with regard to repair stations certificated under part 145 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; and

“(3)

50 months after the date of enactment of this Act, with regard to technical standards orders.

“(e)

Implementation.—

In addressing any recommendations from the inspector general contained in the reports required under subsection (c), the Administrator may—

“(1)

maintain an implementation plan; and

“(2)

broadly adopt any best practices to improve the consistency of interpretation and application of policies, orders, guidance, and regulations by other offices of the Administration and with regard to other activities of the Administration.

“(f)

Briefing.—

Not later than 6 months after receiving a report required under subsection (c), the Administrator shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress on the implementation plan required under subsection (d), the status of any recommendation received pursuant to this section, and any best practices that are being implemented more broadly.”

Part 135 Pilot Supplemental Oxygen Requirement

Pub. L. 118–63, title VIII, § 834, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1340, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning whether to revise the requirements under paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 135.89(b) of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to apply only to aircraft operating at altitudes above flight level 410.

“(b)

Considerations.—

In issuing the notice of proposed rulemaking, the Administrator shall consider applicable safety data and risks, including in relation to applicable incidents and accidents, as well as the investigations and recommendations of the National Transportation Safety Board.”

High-Speed Flight Testing

Pub. L. 118–63, title X, § 1009, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1389, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

The Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration], in consultation with the Administrator of NASA [National Aeronautics and Space Administration], shall establish procedures for the exclusive purposes of developmental and airworthiness testing and demonstration flights, which may include the establishment of high-speed testing corridors in the national airspace system—

“(1)

with respect to manufacturers and operators of high-speed aircraft that conduct flights operating with supersonic speed, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024]; and

“(2)

with respect to manufacturers and operators of high-speed aircraft that conduct flights operating with hypersonic speed, not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

“(b)

Areas of Testing and Demonstration.—

The Administrator shall take action, as appropriate, to ensure flight testing and demonstration flights occur in areas where such flights will not interfere with the safety of other aircraft or the efficient use of airspace in the national airspace system.

“(c)

Considerations.—

In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider—

“(1)

sections 91.817 and 91.818 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations;

“(2)

applications for special flight authorizations for flights operating at supersonic or hypersonic speed, as described in section 91.818 of such title;

“(3)

the environmental impacts of developmental and airworthiness testing operations;

“(4)

requiring applicants to include specification of proposed flight areas;

“(5)

the authorization of flights to and from airports in Class D airspace within 10 nautical miles of oceanic coastline;

“(6)

developing the vertical limits at or above the altitude necessary for safe supersonic and hypersonic operations;

“(7)

proponent-provided data regarding the design and operational analysis of the aircraft, as well as data regarding sonic boom overpressures;

“(8)

the safety of the uninvolved public; and

“(9)

community outreach, education, and engagement.

“(d)

Consultation.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency and other stakeholders, shall assess and report to the covered committees of Congress [Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate] on a means for supporting continued compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Administrator shall seek to enter into an agreement with an appropriate federally funded research and development center, or other independent nonprofit organization that recommends long term solutions for maintaining compliance with such Act for 1 or more over-land or near-land hypersonic and supersonic test areas as established by the Administrator.

“(e)

Definitions.—

In this section:

“(1)

High-speed aircraft.—

The term ‘high-speed aircraft’ means an aircraft operating at speeds in excess of Mach 1, including supersonic and hypersonic aircraft.

“(2)

Hypersonic.—

The term ‘hypersonic’ means flights operating at speeds that exceed Mach 5.

“(3)

Supersonic.—

The term ‘supersonic’ means flights operating at speeds in excess of Mach 1 but less than Mach 5.”

Letter of Deviation Authority

Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LVI, § 5604, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3406, provided that: “A flight instructor, registered owner, lessor, or lessee of an aircraft shall not be required to obtain a letter of deviation authority from the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to allow, conduct or receive flight training, checking, and testing in an experimental aircraft if—

“(1)

the flight instructor is not providing both the training and the aircraft;

“(2)

no person advertises or broadly offers the aircraft as available for flight training, checking, or testing; and

“(3)

Safety Management Systems

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 309, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1073, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall review the final rule of the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration] titled ‘Safety Management Systems’ and issued on April 26, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 33068).

“(b)

Applicability.—

In reviewing the final rule under subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure that the safety management system requirement under such final rule described in subsection (a) is applied to all certificate holders operating under the rules for commuter and on-demand operations under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, commercial air tour operators operating under section 91.147 of such title, production certificate holders that are holders or licensees of a type certificate for the same product, and holders of a type certificate who license out such certificate for production under part 21 of such title.

“(c)

Determination.—

If the Administrator determines the final rule does not apply the safety management system requirement in the manner described in subsection (b), the Administrator shall issue such regulation, guidance, or policy as may be necessary to ensure such safety management system requirement is applied in such manner.”

Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, title I, § 102(a)–(f), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2309, 2310, provided that:

“(a)

Rulemaking Proceeding.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this title [Dec. 27, 2020], the Administrator shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to require that manufacturers that hold both a type certificate and a production certificate issued pursuant to section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, where the United States is the State of Design and State of Manufacture, have in place a safety management system that is consistent with the standards and recommended practices established by ICAO and contained in annex 19 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (61 Stat. 1180), for such systems.

“(2)

Contents of regulations.—

The regulations issued under paragraph (1) shall, at a minimum—

“(A)

ensure safety management systems are consistent with, and complementary to, existing safety management systems;

“(B)

include provisions that would permit operational feedback from operators and pilots qualified on the manufacturers’ equipment to ensure that the operational assumptions made during design and certification remain valid;

“(C)

include provisions for the Administrator’s approval of, and regular oversight of adherence to, a certificate holder’s safety management system adopted pursuant to such regulations; and

“(D)

require such certificate holder to adopt, not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of this title, a safety management system.

“(b)

Final Rule Deadline.—

Not later than 24 months after initiating the rulemaking under subsection (a), the Administrator shall issue a final rule.

“(c)

Surveillance and Audit Requirement.—

The final rule issued pursuant to subsection (b) shall include a requirement for the Administrator to implement a systems approach to risk-based surveillance by defining and planning inspections, audits, and monitoring activities on a continuous basis, to ensure that design and production approval holders of aviation products meet and continue to meet safety management system requirements under the rule.

“(d)

Engagement With ICAO.—

The Administrator shall engage with ICAO and foreign civil aviation authorities to help encourage the adoption of safety management systems for manufacturers on a global basis, consistent with ICAO standards.

“(e)

Safety Reporting Program.—

The regulations issued under subsection (a) shall require a safety management system to include a confidential employee reporting system through which employees can report hazards, issues, concerns, occurrences, and incidents. A reporting system under this subsection shall include provisions for reporting, without concern for reprisal for reporting, of such items by employees in a manner consistent with confidential employee reporting systems administered by the Administrator. Such regulations shall also require a certificate holder described in subsection (a) to submit a summary of reports received under this subsection to the Administrator at least twice per year.

“(f)

Code of Ethics.—

The regulations issued under subsection (a) shall require a safety management system to include establishment of a code of ethics applicable to all appropriate employees of a certificate holder, including officers (as determined by the FAA), which clarifies that safety is the organization’s highest priority.

[For definitions of terms used in section 102(a)–(f) of div. V of Pub. L. 116–260, set out above, see section 137 of div. V of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 40101 of this title.]

Certification Oversight Staff

Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, title I, § 104, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2316, provided that:

“(a)

Authorization of Appropriations.—

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator $27,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2023 to recruit and retain engineers, safety inspectors, human factors specialists, chief scientific and technical advisors, software and cybersecurity experts, and other qualified technical experts who perform duties related to the certification of aircraft, aircraft engines, propellers, appliances, and new and emerging technologies, and perform other regulatory activities.

“(b)

In General.—

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this title [Dec. 27, 2020], and without duplicating any recently completed or ongoing reviews, the Administrator shall initiate a review of—

“(1)

the inspectors, human factors specialists, flight test pilots, engineers, managers, and executives in the FAA who are responsible for the certification of the design, manufacture, and operation of aircraft intended for air transportation for purposes of determining whether the FAA has the expertise and capability to adequately understand the safety implications of, and oversee the adoption of, new or innovative technologies, materials, and procedures used by designers and manufacturers of such aircraft; and

“(2)

the Senior Technical Experts Program to determine whether the program should be enhanced or expanded to bolster and support the programs of the FAA’s Office of Aviation Safety, with particular focus placed on the Aircraft Certification Service and the Flight Standards Service (or any successor organizations), particularly with respect to understanding the safety implications of new or innovative technologies, materials, aircraft operations, and procedures used by designers and manufacturers of such aircraft.

“(c)

Deadline for Completion.—

Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this title, the Administrator shall complete the review required by subsection (b).

“(d)

Briefing.—

Not later than 30 days after the completion of the review required by subsection (b), the Administrator shall brief the congressional committees of jurisdiction on the results of the review. The briefing shall include the following:

“(1)

An analysis of the Administration’s ability to hire safety inspectors, human factors specialists, flight test pilots, engineers, managers, executives, scientists, and technical advisors, who have the requisite expertise to oversee new developments in aerospace design and manufacturing.

“(2)

A plan for the Administration to improve the overall expertise of the FAA’s personnel who are responsible for the oversight of the design and manufacture of aircraft.

“(e)

Consultation Requirement.—

In completing the review under subsection (b), the Administrator shall consult and collaborate with appropriate stakeholders, including labor organizations (including those representing aviation workers, FAA aviation safety engineers, human factors specialists, flight test pilots, and FAA aviation safety inspectors), and aerospace manufacturers.

“(f)

Recruitment and Retention.—

“(1)

Bargaining units.—

Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this title, the Administrator shall begin collaboration with the exclusive bargaining representatives of engineers, safety inspectors, systems safety specialists, and other qualified technical experts certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code, to improve recruitment of employees for, and to implement retention incentives for employees holding, positions with respect to the certification of aircraft, aircraft engines, propellers, and appliances. If the Administrator and such representatives are unable to reach an agreement collaboratively, the Administrator and such representatives shall negotiate in accordance with section 40122(a) of title 49, United States Code, to improve recruitment and implement retention incentives for employees described in subsection (a) who are covered under a collective bargaining agreement.

“(2)

Other employees.—

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this title, the Administrator shall initiate actions to improve recruitment of, and implement retention incentives for, any individual described in subsection (a) who is not covered under a collective bargaining agreement.

“(3)

Rule of construction.—

Nothing in this section shall be construed to vest in any exclusive bargaining representative any management right of the Administrator, as such right existed on the day before the date of enactment of this title.

“(4)

Availability of appropriations.—

Any action taken by the Administrator under this section shall be subject to the availability of appropriations authorized under subsection (a).”

[For definitions of terms used in section 104 of div. V of Pub. L. 116–260, set out above, see section 137 of div. V of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 40101 of this title.]

Voluntary Safety Reporting Program

Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, title I, § 113, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2332, as amended by Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 306(e), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1072, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this title [Dec. 27, 2020], the Administrator shall establish a voluntary safety reporting program for engineers, safety inspectors, systems safety specialists, and other subject matter experts certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code, to confidentially report instances where they have identified safety concerns during certification or oversight processes.

“(b)

Safety Reporting Program Requirements.—

In establishing the safety reporting program under subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure the following:

“(1)

The FAA maintains a reporting culture that encourages human factors specialists, engineers, flight test pilots, inspectors, and other appropriate FAA employees to voluntarily report safety concerns.

“(2)

The safety reporting program is non-punitive, confidential, and protects employees from adverse employment actions related to their participation in the program.

“(3)

The safety reporting program identifies exclusionary criteria for the program.

“(4)

Collaborative development of the program with bargaining representatives of employees under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code, who are employed in the Aircraft Certification Service or Flight Standards Service of the Administration (or, if unable to reach an agreement collaboratively, the Administrator shall negotiate with the representatives in accordance with section 40122(a) of title 49, United States Code, regarding the development of the program).

“(5)

Full and collaborative participation in the program by the bargaining representatives of employees described in paragraph (4).

“(6)

The Administrator thoroughly reviews safety reports to determine whether there is a safety issue, including a hazard, defect, noncompliance, nonconformance, or process error.

“(7)

The Administrator thoroughly reviews safety reports to determine whether any aircraft certification process contributed to the safety concern being raised.

“(8)

The creation of a corrective action process in order to address safety issues that are identified through the program.

“(c)

Outcomes.—

Results of safety report reviews under this section may be used to—

“(1)

improve—

“(A)

safety systems, hazard control, and risk reduction;

“(B)

certification systems;

“(C)

FAA oversight;

“(D)

compliance and conformance; and

“(E)

any other matter determined necessary by the Administrator; and

“(2)

implement lessons learned.

“(d)

Report Filing.—

The Administrator shall establish requirements for when in the certification process reports may be filed to—

“(1)

ensure that identified issues can be addressed in a timely manner; and

“(2)

foster open dialogue between applicants and FAA employees throughout the certification process.

“(e)

Integration With Other Safety Reporting Programs.—

The Administrator shall implement the safety reporting program established under subsection (a) and the reporting requirements established pursuant to subsection (d) in a manner that is consistent with other voluntary safety reporting programs administered by the Administrator.

“(f)

Report to Congress.—

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this title, and annually thereafter through fiscal year 2028, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional committees of jurisdiction a report on the effectiveness of the safety reporting program established under subsection (a).”

[For definitions of terms used in section 113 of div. V of Pub. L. 116–260, set out above, see section 137 of div. V of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 40101 of this title.]

FAA Safety Oversight and Certification and Performance Metrics

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title II, §§ 201, 202, 211, 221, 223, 224, 243, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3242, 3246, 3252, 3254, 3255, 3259, as amended by Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, title I, § 129, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2349; Pub. L. 118–63, title I, § 104(e), title VIII, § 823, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1035, 1332, provided that:

“SEC. 201.

DEFINITIONS.

“In this title [enacting this note and section 44736 of this title and amending this section and sections 40104, 44704, and 45305 of this title], the following definitions apply:

“(1)

Administrator.—

The term ‘Administrator’ means the Administrator of the FAA.

“(2)

Advisory committee.—

The term ‘Advisory Committee’ means the Safety Oversight and Certification Advisory Committee established under section 202.

“(3)

FAA.—

The term ‘FAA’ means the Federal Aviation Administration.

“(4)

Secretary.—

The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of Transportation.

“(5)

Systems safety approach.—

The term ‘systems safety approach’ means the application of specialized technical and managerial skills to the systematic, forward-looking identification and control of hazards throughout the lifecycle of a project, program, or activity.

“SEC. 202.

SAFETY OVERSIGHT AND CERTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

“(a)

Establishment.—

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Secretary shall establish a Safety Oversight and Certification Advisory Committee.

“(b)

Duties.—

The Advisory Committee shall provide advice to the Secretary on policy-level issues facing the aviation community that are related to FAA safety oversight and certification programs and activities, including, at a minimum, the following:

“(1)

Aircraft and flight standards certification processes, including efforts to streamline those processes.

“(2)

Implementation and oversight of safety management systems.

“(3)

Risk-based oversight efforts.

“(4)

Utilization of delegation and designation authorities, including organization designation authorization.

“(5)

Regulatory interpretation standardization efforts.

“(6)

Training programs.

“(7)

Expediting the rulemaking process and giving priority to rules related to safety.

“(8)

Enhancing global competitiveness of United States manufactured and United States certificated aerospace and aviation products and services throughout the world.

“(c)

Functions.—

In carrying out its duties under subsection (b), the Advisory Committee shall:

“(1)

Foster industry collaboration in an open and transparent manner.

“(2)

Consult with, and ensure participation by—

“(A)

the private sector, including representatives of—

“(i)

general aviation;

“(ii)

commercial aviation;

“(iii)

aviation labor;

“(iv)

aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul;

“(v)

aviation, aerospace, and avionics manufacturing;

“(vi)

unmanned aircraft systems operators and manufacturers; and

“(vii)

the commercial space transportation industry;

“(B)

members of the public; and

“(C)

other interested parties.

“(3)

Recommend consensus national goals, strategic objectives, and priorities for the most efficient, streamlined, and cost-effective certification and safety oversight processes in order to maintain the safety of the aviation system and, at the same time, allow the FAA to meet future needs and ensure that aviation stakeholders remain competitive in the global marketplace.

“(4)

Provide policy guidance recommendations for the FAA’s certification and safety oversight efforts.

“(5)

On a regular basis, review and provide recommendations on the FAA’s certification and safety oversight efforts.

“(6)

Periodically review and evaluate registration, certification, and related fees.

“(7)

Provide appropriate legislative, regulatory, and guidance recommendations for the air transportation system and the aviation safety regulatory environment.

“[(8)

, (9). Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, title I, § 129(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2349.]

“(10)

Provide a venue for tracking progress toward national goals and sustaining joint commitments.

“(11)

Recommend recruiting, hiring, training, and continuing education objectives for FAA aviation safety engineers and aviation safety inspectors.

“(12)

Provide advice and recommendations to the FAA on how to prioritize safety rulemaking projects.

“(13)

Improve the development of FAA regulations by providing information, advice, and recommendations related to aviation issues.

“(14)

Facilitate the validation and acceptance of United States manufactured and United States certificated products and services throughout the world.

“(d)

Membership.—

“(1)

In general.—

The Advisory Committee shall be composed of the following members:

“(A)

The Administrator (or the Administrator’s designee).

“(B)

At least 11 individuals, appointed by the Secretary, each of whom represents at least 1 of the following interests:

“(i)

Transport aircraft and engine manufacturers.

“(ii)

General aviation aircraft and engine manufacturers.

“(iii)

Avionics and equipment manufacturers.

“(iv)

Aviation labor organizations, including collective bargaining representatives of FAA aviation safety inspectors and aviation safety engineers.

“(v)

General aviation operators.

“(vi)

Air carriers.

“(vii)

Business aviation operators.

“(viii)

Unmanned aircraft systems manufacturers and operators.

“(ix)

Aviation safety management experts.

“(x)

Aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul.

“(xi)

Airport owners and operators.

“(2)

Nonvoting members.—

“(A)

In general.—

In addition to the members appointed under paragraph (1), the Advisory Committee shall be composed of nonvoting members appointed by the Secretary from among individuals representing FAA safety oversight program offices.

“(B)

Duties.—

The nonvoting members may—

“(i)

take part in deliberations of the Advisory Committee; and

“(ii)

provide input with respect to any final reports or recommendations of the Advisory Committee.

“(C)

Limitation.—

The nonvoting members may not represent any stakeholder interest other than that of an FAA safety oversight program office.

“(3)

Terms.—

Each voting member and nonvoting member of the Advisory Committee appointed by the Secretary shall be appointed for a term of 2 years.

“(4)

Committee characteristics.—

The Advisory Committee shall have the following characteristics:

“(A)

Each voting member under paragraph (1)(B) shall be an executive officer of the organization who has decisionmaking authority within the member’s organization and can represent and enter into commitments on behalf of such organization.

“(B)

The ability to obtain necessary information from experts in the aviation and aerospace communities.

“(C)

A membership size that enables the Advisory Committee to have substantive discussions and reach consensus on issues in a timely manner.

“(D)

Appropriate expertise, including expertise in certification and risked-based safety oversight processes, operations, policy, technology, labor relations, training, and finance.

“(5)

Limitation on statutory construction.—

Public Law 104–65 [the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995] (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) may not be construed to prohibit or otherwise limit the appointment of any individual as a member of the Advisory Committee.

“(e)

Chairperson.—

“(1)

In general.—

The Chairperson of the Advisory Committee shall be appointed by the Secretary from among those members of the Advisory Committee that are voting members under subsection (d)(1)(B).

“(2)

Term.—

Each member appointed under paragraph (1) shall serve a term of 2 years as Chairperson.

“(f)

Meetings.—

“(1)

Frequency.—

The Advisory Committee shall meet at least twice each year at the call of the Chairperson.

“(2)

Public attendance.—

The meetings of the Advisory Committee shall be open and accessible to the public.

“(g)

Special Committees.—

“(1)

Establishment.—

The Advisory Committee may establish special committees composed of private sector representatives, members of the public, labor representatives, and other relevant parties in complying with consultation and participation requirements under this section.

“(2)

Rulemaking advice.—

A special committee established by the Advisory Committee may—

“(A)

provide rulemaking advice and recommendations to the Advisory Committee with respect to aviation-related issues;

“(B)

provide the FAA additional opportunities to obtain firsthand information and insight from those parties that are most affected by existing and proposed regulations; and

“(C)

assist in expediting the development, revision, or elimination of rules without circumventing public rulemaking processes and procedures.

“(3)

Applicable law.—

Public Law 92–463 [the Federal Advisory Committee Act, see 5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.] shall not apply to a special committee established by the Advisory Committee.

“(h)

Sunset.—

The Advisory Committee shall terminate on October 1, 2028.

“(i)

Termination of Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.—

The Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee established by the FAA shall terminate on the date of the initial appointment of the members of the Advisory Committee.

“[SECS. 211, 221. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. V, title I, § 129(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2349.]

“SEC. 223.

CENTRALIZED SAFETY GUIDANCE DATABASE.

“(a)

Establishment.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator shall establish a centralized safety guidance database that will—

“(1)

encompass all of the regulatory guidance documents of the FAA Office of Aviation Safety;

“(2)

contain, for each such guidance document, a link to the Code of Federal Regulations provision to which the document relates; and

“(3)

be publicly available in a manner that—

“(A)

protects from disclosure identifying information regarding an individual or entity; and

“(B)

prevents inappropriate disclosure proprietary information.

“(b)

Data Entry Timing.—

“(1)

Existing documents.—

Not later than 14 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall begin entering into the database established under subsection (a) all of the regulatory guidance documents of the Office of Aviation Safety that are in effect and were issued before the date on which the Administrator begins such entry process.

“(2)

New documents and changes.—

On and after the date on which the Administrator begins the document entry process under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall ensure that all new regulatory guidance documents of the Office of Aviation Safety and any changes to existing documents are included in the database established under subsection (a) as such documents or changes to existing documents are issued.

“(c)

Consultation Requirement.—

In establishing the database under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consult and collaborate with appropriate stakeholders, including labor organizations (including those representing aviation workers, FAA aviation safety engineers and FAA aviation safety inspectors) and aviation industry stakeholders.

“(d)

Regulatory Guidance Documents Defined.—

In this section, the term ‘regulatory guidance documents’ means all forms of written information issued by the FAA that an individual or entity may use to interpret or apply FAA regulations and requirements, including information an individual or entity may use to determine acceptable means of compliance with such regulations and requirements, such as an order, manual, circular, policy statement, legal interpretation memorandum, or rulemaking document.

“SEC. 224.

REGULATORY CONSISTENCY COMMUNICATIONS BOARD.

“(a)

Establishment.—

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator shall establish a Regulatory Consistency Communications Board (in this section referred to as the ‘Board’).

“(b)

Consultation Requirement.—

In establishing the Board, the Administrator shall consult and collaborate with appropriate stakeholders, including FAA labor organizations (including labor organizations representing FAA aviation safety inspectors) and industry stakeholders.

“(c)

Membership.—

The Board shall be composed of FAA representatives, appointed by the Administrator, from—

“(1)

the Flight Standards Service;

“(2)

the Aircraft Certification Service;

“(3)

the Office of the Chief Counsel;

“(4)

the Office of Airports;

“(5)

the Office of Security and Hazardous Materials Safety;

“(6)

the Office of Rulemaking and Regulatory Improvement; and

“(7)

such other offices as the Administrator determines appropriate.

“(d)

Functions.—

The Board shall carry out the following functions:

“(1)

Establish, at a minimum, processes by which—

“(A)

FAA personnel and persons regulated by the FAA may submit regulatory interpretation questions, including anonymously, without fear of retaliation;

“(B)

FAA personnel may submit written questions, and receive written responses, as to whether a previous approval or regulatory interpretation issued by FAA personnel in another office or region is correct or incorrect; and

“(C)

any other person may submit written regulatory interpretation questions, including anonymously.

“(2)

Meet on a regular basis to discuss and resolve questions submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) and the appropriate application of regulations and policy with respect to each question.

“(3)

Provide to a person that submitted a question pursuant to subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) a timely written response to the question.

“(4)

Establish a process to make resolutions of common regulatory interpretation questions publicly available to FAA personnel, persons regulated by the FAA, and the public without revealing any identifying data of the person that submitted the question and in a manner that protects any proprietary information.

“(5)

Ensure the incorporation of resolutions of questions submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) into regulatory guidance documents, as such term is defined in section 223(d).

“(6)

Submit recommendations, as needed, to the Assistant Administrator for Rulemaking and Regulatory Improvement for consideration.

“(e)

Performance Metrics, Timelines, and Goals.—

Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Advisory Committee recommends performance objectives and performance metrics for the FAA and the regulated aviation industry under section 202, the Administrator, in collaboration with the Advisory Committee, shall—

“(1)

establish performance metrics, timelines, and goals to measure the progress of the Board in resolving regulatory interpretation questions submitted pursuant to subsection (d)(1); and

“(2)

implement a process for tracking the progress of the Board in meeting the performance metrics, timelines, and goals established under paragraph (1).

“SEC. 243.

FAA LEADERSHIP ABROAD.

“(a)

In General.—

To promote United States aerospace safety standards, reduce redundant regulatory activity, and facilitate acceptance of FAA design and production approvals abroad, the Administrator shall—

“(1)

attain greater expertise in issues related to dispute resolution, intellectual property, and export control laws to better support FAA certification and other aerospace regulatory activities abroad;

“(2)

work with United States companies to more accurately track the amount of time it takes foreign authorities, including bilateral partners, to validate United States certificated aeronautical products;

“(3)

provide assistance to United States companies that have experienced significantly long foreign validation wait times;

“(4)

work with foreign authorities, including bilateral partners, to collect and analyze data to determine the timeliness of the acceptance and validation of FAA design and production approvals by foreign authorities and the acceptance and validation of foreign-certified products by the FAA;

“(5)

establish appropriate benchmarks and metrics to measure the success of bilateral aviation safety agreements and to reduce the validation time for United States certificated aeronautical products abroad; and

“(6)

work with foreign authorities, including bilateral partners, to improve the timeliness of the acceptance and validation of FAA design and production approvals by foreign authorities and the acceptance and validation of foreign-certified products by the FAA.

“(b)

Report.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that—

“(1)

describes the FAA’s strategic plan for international engagement;

“(2)

describes the structure and responsibilities of all FAA offices that have international responsibilities, including the Aircraft Certification Office, and all the activities conducted by those offices related to certification and production;

“(3)

describes current and forecasted staffing and travel needs for the FAA’s international engagement activities, including the needs of the Aircraft Certification Office in the current and forecasted budgetary environment;

“(4)

provides recommendations, if appropriate, to improve the existing structure and personnel and travel policies supporting the FAA’s international engagement activities, including the activities of the Aviation Certification Office, to better support the growth of United States aerospace exports; and

“(5)

identifies cost-effective policy initiatives, regulatory initiatives, or legislative initiatives needed to improve and enhance the timely acceptance of United States aerospace products abroad.

“(c)

International Travel.—

The Administrator, or the Administrator’s designee, may authorize international travel for any FAA employee, without the approval of any other person or entity, if the Administrator determines that the travel is necessary—

“(1)

to promote United States aerospace safety standards; or

“(2)

to support expedited acceptance of FAA design and production approvals.”

FAA Technical Training

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 302, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3260, provided that:

“(a)

E-learning Training Pilot Program.—

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration], in collaboration with the exclusive bargaining representatives of covered FAA personnel, shall establish an e-learning training pilot program in accordance with the requirements of this section.

“(b)

Curriculum.—

The pilot program shall—

“(1)

include a recurrent training curriculum for covered FAA personnel to ensure that the covered FAA personnel receive instruction on the latest aviation technologies, processes, and procedures;

“(2)

focus on providing specialized technical training for covered FAA personnel, as determined necessary by the Administrator;

“(3)

include training courses on applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration; and

“(4)

consider the efficacy of instructor-led online training.

“(c)

Pilot Program Termination.—

The pilot program shall terminate 1 year after the date of establishment of the pilot program.

“(d)

E-learning Training Program.—

Upon termination of the pilot program, the Administrator shall assess and establish or update an e-learning training program that incorporates lessons learned for covered FAA personnel as a result of the pilot program.

“(e)

Definitions.—

In this section, the following definitions apply:

“(1)

Covered faa personnel.—

The term ‘covered FAA personnel’ means airway transportation systems specialists and aviation safety inspectors of the Federal Aviation Administration.

“(2)

E-learning training.—

The term ‘e-learning training’ means learning utilizing electronic technologies to access educational curriculum outside of a traditional classroom.”

Safety Critical Staffing

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 303, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3261, provided that:

“(a)

Update of FAA’s Safety Critical Staffing Model.—

Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall update the safety critical staffing model of the Administration to determine the number of aviation safety inspectors that will be needed to fulfill the safety oversight mission of the Administration.

“(b)

Audit by DOT Inspector General.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Administrator has updated the safety critical staffing model under subsection (a), the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation shall conduct an audit of the staffing model.

“(2)

Contents.—

The audit shall include, at a minimum—

“(A)

a review of the assumptions and methodologies used in devising and implementing the staffing model to assess the adequacy of the staffing model in predicting the number of aviation safety inspectors needed—

“(i)

to properly fulfill the mission of the Administration; and

“(ii)

to meet the future growth of the aviation industry; and

“(B)

a determination on whether the staffing model takes into account the Administration’s authority to fully utilize designees.

“(3)

Report on audit.—

“(A)

Report to secretary.—

Not later than 30 days after the date of completion of the audit, the Inspector General shall submit to the Secretary a report on the results of the audit.

“(B)

Report to congress.—

Not later than 60 days after the date of receipt of the report, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a copy of the report, together with, if appropriate, a description of any actions taken or to be taken to address the results of the audit.”

Emergency Medical Equipment on Passenger Aircraft

Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 368, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1136, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding first aid and emergency medical kit equipment and training required for flight crewmembers, as provided in part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, applicable to all certificate holders operating passenger aircraft under such part.

“(b)

Considerations.—

In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider—

“(1)

the benefits and costs (including the costs of flight diversions and emergency landings) of requiring any new medications or equipment necessary to be included in approved emergency medical kits;

“(2)

whether the contents of the emergency medical kits include, at a minimum, appropriate medications and equipment that can practicably be administered to address—

“(A)

the emergency medical needs of children and pregnant women;

“(B)

opioid overdose reversal;

“(C)

anaphylaxis; and

“(D)

cardiac arrest;

“(3)

what contents of the emergency medical kits should be readily available, to the extent practicable, for use by flight crews without prior approval by a medical professional.

“(c)

Regular Review.—

Not later than 5 years after the issuance of the final rule under subsection (a), and every 5 years thereafter, the Administrator shall evaluate and revise, if appropriate—

“(1)

the first aid and emergency medical kit equipment and training required for flight crewmembers; and

“(2)

any required training for flight crewmembers regarding the content, location, and function of such kit.”

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 307, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3263, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall evaluate and revise, as appropriate, regulations in part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, regarding emergency medical equipment, including the contents of first-aid kits, applicable to all certificate holders operating passenger aircraft under that part.

“(b)

Consideration.—

In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider whether the minimum contents of approved emergency medical kits, including approved first-aid kits, include appropriate medications and equipment to meet the emergency medical needs of children and pregnant women.”

FAA and NTSB Review of General Aviation Safety

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 308, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3263, provided that:

“(a)

Study Required.—

Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration], in coordination with the Chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board, shall initiate a study of general aviation safety.

“(b)

Study Contents.—

The study required under subsection (a) shall include—

“(1)

a review of all general aviation accidents since 2000, including a review of—

“(A)

the number of such accidents;

“(B)

the number of injuries and fatalities, including with respect to both occupants of aircraft and individuals on the ground, as a result of such accidents;

“(C)

the number of such accidents investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board;

“(D)

the number of such accidents investigated by the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration]; and

“(E)

a summary of the factual findings and probable cause determinations with respect to such accidents;

“(2)

an assessment of the most common probable cause determinations issued for general aviation accidents since 2000;

“(3)

an assessment of the most common facts analyzed by the FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board in the course of investigations of general aviation accidents since 2000, including operational details;

“(4)

a review of the safety recommendations of the National Transportation Safety Board related to general aviation accidents since 2000;

“(5)

an assessment of the responses of the FAA and the general aviation community to the safety recommendations of the National Transportation Safety Board related to general aviation accidents since 2000;

“(6)

an assessment of the most common general aviation safety issues;

“(7)

a review of the total costs to the Federal Government to conduct investigations of general aviation accidents over the last 10 years; and

“(8)

other matters the Administrator or the Chairman considers appropriate.

“(c)

Recommendations and Actions To Address General Aviation Safety.—

Based on the results of the study required under subsection (a), the Administrator, in consultation with the Chairman, shall make such recommendations, including with respect to regulations and enforcement activities, as the Administrator considers necessary to—

“(1)

address general aviation safety issues identified under the study;

“(2)

protect persons and property on the ground; and

“(3)

improve the safety of general aviation operators in the United States.

“(d)

Authority.—

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator shall have the authority to undertake actions to address the recommendations made under subsection (c).

“(e)

Report.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a report on the results of the study required under subsection (a), including the recommendations described in subsection (c).

“(f)

General Aviation Defined.—

In this section, the term ‘general aviation’ means aircraft operation for personal, recreational, or other noncommercial purposes.”

Aviation Rulemaking Committee for Part 135 Pilot Rest and Duty Rules

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 315, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3267, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall convene an aviation rulemaking committee to review, and develop findings and recommendations regarding, pilot rest and duty rules under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(b)

Duties.—

The Administrator shall—

“(1)

not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a report based on the findings of the aviation rulemaking committee; and

“(2)

not later than 1 year after the date of submission of the report under paragraph (1), issue a notice of proposed rulemaking based on any consensus recommendations reached by the aviation rulemaking committee.

“(c)

Composition.—

The aviation rulemaking committee shall consist of members appointed by the Administrator, including—

“(1)

representatives of industry;

“(2)

representatives of aviation labor organizations, including collective bargaining units representing pilots who are covered by part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and subpart K of part 91 of such title; and

“(3)

aviation safety experts with specific knowledge of flight crewmember education and training requirements under part 135 of such title.

“(d)

Considerations.—

The Administrator shall direct the aviation rulemaking committee to consider—

“(1)

recommendations of prior part 135 rulemaking committees;

“(2)

accommodations necessary for small businesses;

“(3)

scientific data derived from aviation-related fatigue and sleep research;

“(4)

data gathered from aviation safety reporting programs;

“(5)

the need to accommodate the diversity of operations conducted under part 135, including the unique duty and rest time requirements of air ambulance pilots; and

“(6)

other items, as appropriate.”

Voluntary Reports of Operational or Maintenance Issues Related to Aviation Safety

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 320, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3269, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

There shall be a presumption that an individual’s voluntary report of an operational or maintenance issue related to aviation safety under an aviation safety action program meets the criteria for acceptance as a valid report under such program.

“(b)

Disclaimer Required.—

Any dissemination, within the participating organization, of a report that was submitted and accepted under an aviation safety action program pursuant to the presumption under subsection (a), but that has not undergone review by an event review committee, shall be accompanied by a disclaimer stating that the report—

“(1)

has not been reviewed by an event review committee tasked with reviewing such reports; and

“(2)

may subsequently be determined to be ineligible for inclusion in the aviation safety action program.

“(c)

Rejection of Report.—

“(1)

In general.—

A report described under subsection (a) shall be rejected from an aviation safety action program if, after a review of the report, an event review committee tasked with reviewing such report, or the Federal Aviation Administration member of the event review committee in the case that the review committee does not reach consensus, determines that the report fails to meet the criteria for acceptance under such program.

“(2)

Protections.—

In any case in which a report of an individual described under subsection (a) is rejected under paragraph (1)—

“(A)

the enforcement-related incentive offered to the individual for making such a report shall not apply; and

“(B)

the protection from disclosure of the report itself under section 40123 of title 49, United States Code, shall not apply.

“(3)

Aviation safety action program defined.—

In this section, the term ‘aviation safety action program’ means a program established in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 120–66B, issued November 15, 2002 (including any similar successor advisory circular), to allow an individual to voluntarily disclose operational or maintenance issues related to aviation safety.”

Flight Attendant Duty Period Limitations and Rest Requirements

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 335, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3280, provided that:

“(a)

Modification of Final Rule.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Secretary of Transportation shall modify the final rule of the Federal Aviation Administration published in the Federal Register on August 19, 1994 (59 Fed. Reg. 42974; relating to flight attendant duty period limitations and rest requirements) in accordance with the requirements of this subsection.

“(2)

Contents.—

The final rule, as modified under paragraph (1), shall ensure that—

“(A)

a flight attendant scheduled to a duty period of 14 hours or less is given a scheduled rest period of at least 10 consecutive hours; and

“(B)

the rest period is not reduced under any circumstances.

“(b)

Fatigue Risk Management Plan.—

“(1)

Submission of plan by part 121 air carriers.—

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, each air carrier operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (in this section referred to as a ‘part 121 air carrier’), shall submit to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration for review and acceptance a fatigue risk management plan for the carrier’s flight attendants.

“(2)

Contents of plan.—

A fatigue risk management plan submitted by a part 121 air carrier under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

“(A)

Current flight time and duty period limitations.

“(B)

A rest scheme consistent with such limitations that enables the management of flight attendant fatigue, including annual training to increase awareness of—

“(i)

fatigue;

“(ii)

the effects of fatigue on flight attendants; and

“(iii)

fatigue countermeasures.

“(C)

Development and use of a methodology that continually assesses the effectiveness of implementation of the plan, including the ability of the plan—

“(i)

to improve alertness; and

“(ii)

to mitigate performance errors.

“(3)

Review.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator shall review and accept or reject each fatigue risk management plan submitted under this subsection. If the Administrator rejects a plan, the Administrator shall provide suggested modifications for resubmission of the plan.

“(4)

Plan updates.—

“(A)

In general.—

A part 121 air carrier shall update its fatigue risk management plan under paragraph (1) every 2 years and submit the update to the Administrator for review and acceptance.

“(B)

Review.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of submission of a plan update under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall review and accept or reject the update. If the Administrator rejects an update, the Administrator shall provide suggested modifications for resubmission of the update.

“(5)

Compliance.—

A part 121 air carrier shall comply with the fatigue risk management plan of the air carrier that is accepted by the Administrator under this subsection.

“(6)

Civil penalties.—

A violation of this subsection by a part 121 air carrier shall be treated as a violation of chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, for purposes of the application of civil penalties under chapter 463 of that title.”

Clarification of Requirements for Living History Flights

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title V, § 532, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3366, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Notwithstanding any other law or regulation, in administering sections 61.113(c), 91.9, 91.315, 91.319(a)(1), 91.319(a)(2), 119.5(g), and 119.21(a) of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations), the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall allow an aircraft owner or operator to accept monetary or in-kind donations for a flight operated by a living history flight experience provider, if the aircraft owner or operator has—

“(1)

volunteered to provide such transportation; and

“(2)

notified any individual that will be on the flight, at the time of inquiry about the flight, that the flight operation is for charitable purposes and is not subject to the same requirements as a commercial flight.

“(b)

Conditions To Ensure Public Safety.—

The Administrator, consistent with current standards of the [Federal Aviation] Administration for such operations, shall impose minimum standards with respect to training and flight hours for operations conducted by an owner or operator of an aircraft providing living history flight experience operations, including mandating that the pilot in command of such aircraft hold a commercial pilot certificate with instrument rating and be current and qualified with respect to all ratings or authorizations applicable to the specific aircraft being flown to ensure the safety of flight operations described in subsection (a).

“(c)

Living History Flight Experience Provider Defined.—

In this section, the term ‘living history flight experience provider’ means an aircraft owner, aircraft operator, or organization that provides, arranges, or otherwise fosters living history flight experiences for the purpose of fulfilling its mission.”

FAA Civil Aviation Registry Upgrade

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title V, § 546, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3376, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall complete covered upgrades of the Administration’s Civil Aviation Registry (in this section referred to as the ‘Registry’).

“(b)

Covered Upgrade Defined.—

In this section, the term ‘covered upgrades’ means—

“(1)

the digitization of nondigital Registry information, including paper documents, microfilm images, and photographs, from an analog or nondigital format to a digital format;

“(2)

the digitalization of Registry manual and paper-based processes, business operations, and functions by leveraging digital technologies and a broader use of digitized data;

“(3)

the implementation of systems allowing a member of the public to submit any information or form to the Registry and conduct any transaction with the Registry by electronic or other remote means; and

“(4)

allowing more efficient, broader, and remote access to the Registry.

“(c)

Applicability.—

The requirements of subsection (a) shall apply to the entire Civil Aviation Registry, including the Aircraft Registration Branch and the Airmen Certification Branch.

“(d)

Manual Surcharge.—

[Enacted section 45306 of this title.]

“(e)

Report.—

Not later than 1 year after date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until the covered upgrades required under subsection (a) are complete, the Administrator shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] describing—

“(1)

the schedule for the covered upgrades to the Registry;

“(2)

the office responsible for the implementation of the such covered upgrades;

“(3)

the metrics being used to measure progress in implementing the covered upgrades; and

“(4)

the status of the covered upgrades as of the date of the report.”

Undeclared Hazardous Materials Public Awareness Campaign

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title V, § 583, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3399, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

The Secretary of Transportation shall carry out a public awareness campaign to reduce the amount of undeclared hazardous materials traveling through air commerce.

“(b)

Campaign Requirements.—

The public awareness campaign required under subsection (a) shall do the following:

“(1)

Focus on targeting segments of the hazardous materials industry with high rates of undeclared shipments through air commerce and educate air carriers, shippers, manufacturers, and other relevant stakeholders of such segments on properly packaging and classifying such shipments.

“(2)

Educate the public on proper ways to declare and ship hazardous materials, examples of everyday items that are considered hazardous materials, and penalties associated with intentional shipments of undeclared hazardous materials.

“(c)

Interagency Working Group.—

“(1)

Establishment.—

Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Secretary of Transportation shall establish an interagency working group to promote collaboration and engagement between the Department of Transportation and other relevant agencies, and develop recommendations and guidance on how best to conduct the public awareness campaign required under subsection (a).

“(2)

Duties.—

The interagency working group shall consult with relevant stakeholders, including cargo air carriers, passenger air carriers, and labor organizations representing pilots for cargo and passenger air carriers operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(d)

Update.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall provide to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] an update on the status of the public awareness campaign required under subsection (a).”

Cockpit Automation Management

Pub. L. 114–190, title II, § 2102, July 15, 2016, 130 Stat. 619, provided that: “Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [July 15, 2016], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall—

“(1)

develop a process to verify that air carrier training programs incorporate measures to train pilots on—

“(A)

monitoring automation systems; and

“(B)

controlling the flightpath of aircraft without autopilot or autoflight systems engaged;

“(2)

develop metrics or measurable tasks that air carriers can use to evaluate pilot monitoring proficiency;

“(3)

issue guidance to aviation safety inspectors responsible for oversight of the operations of air carriers on tracking and assessing pilots’ proficiency in manual flight; and

“(4)

issue guidance to air carriers and inspectors regarding standards for compliance with the requirements for enhanced pilot training contained in the final rule published in the Federal Register on November 12, 2013 (78 Fed. Reg. 67800).”

Additional Certification Resources

Pub. L. 114–190, title II, § 2109, July 15, 2016, 130 Stat. 623, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and subject to the requirements of subsection (b), the Administrator of the FAA may enter into a reimbursable agreement with an applicant or certificate-holder for the reasonable travel and per diem expenses of the FAA associated with official travel to expedite the acceptance or validation by a foreign authority of an FAA certificate or design approval or the acceptance or validation by the FAA of a foreign authority certificate or design approval.

“(b)

Conditions.—

The Administrator may enter into an agreement under subsection (a) only if—

“(1)

the travel covered under the agreement is deemed necessary, by both the Administrator and the applicant or certificate-holder, to expedite the acceptance or validation of the relevant certificate or approval;

“(2)

the travel is conducted at the request of the applicant or certificate-holder;

“(3)

travel plans and expenses are approved by the applicant or certificate-holder prior to travel; and

“(4)

the agreement requires payment in advance of FAA services and is consistent with the processes under section 106(l)(6) of title 49, United States Code.

“(c)

Report.—

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [July 15, 2016], the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] a report on—

“(1)

the number of occasions on which the Administrator entered into reimbursable agreements under this section;

“(2)

the number of occasions on which the Administrator declined a request by an applicant or certificate-holder to enter into a reimbursable agreement under this section;

“(3)

the amount of reimbursements collected in accordance with agreements under this section; and

“(4)

the extent to which reimbursable agreements under this section assisted in reducing the amount of time necessary for validations of certificates and design approvals.

“(d)

Definitions.—

In this section, the following definitions apply:

“(1)

Applicant.—

The term ‘applicant’ means a person that has—

“(A)

applied to a foreign authority for the acceptance or validation of an FAA certificate or design approval; or

“(B)

applied to the FAA for the acceptance or validation of a foreign authority certificate or design approval.

“(2)

Certificate-holder.—

The term ‘certificate-holder’ means a person that holds a certificate issued by the Administrator under part 21 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(3)

FAA.—

The term ‘FAA’ means the Federal Aviation Administration.”

Notices to Air Missions

Pub. L. 118–4, § 3, June 3, 2023, 137 Stat. 9, provided that: “Not later than September 30, 2024, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall make the following improvements:

“(1)

Complete implementation of a Federal NOTAM System (in this section referred to as a ‘FNS’).

“(2)

Implement a back-up system to the FNS.

“(3)

Brief the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on a plan to enhance the capability to deliver information through the FNS that is machine-readable, filterable, and in the format used by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to promote further global harmonization among neighboring Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) and provide users of the National Airspace System with one consistent format for domestic and international operations.”

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 394(a), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3325, provided that: “Beginning on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] may not take any enforcement action against any individual for a violation of a NOTAM (as defined in section 3 of the Pilot’s Bill of Rights [Pub. L. 112–153] (49 U.S.C. 44701 note)) until the Administrator certifies to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] that the Administrator has complied with the requirements of section 3 of the Pilot’s Bill of Rights, as amended by this section.”

Pub. L. 112–153, § 3, Aug. 3, 2012, 126 Stat. 1162, as amended by Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 394(b), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3325, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

“(1)

Definition.—

In this section, the term ‘NOTAM’ means Notices to Airmen.

“(2)

Improvements.—

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Fairness for Pilots Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall complete the implementation of a Notice to Airmen Improvement Program (in this section referred to as the ‘NOTAM Improvement Program’)—

“(A)

to improve the system of providing airmen with pertinent and timely information regarding the national airspace system;

“(B)

to continue developing and modernizing the NOTAM repository, in a public central location, to maintain and archive all NOTAMs, including the original content and form of the notices, the original date of publication, and any amendments to such notices with the date of each amendment, in a manner that is Internet-accessible, machine-readable, and searchable;

“(C)

to apply filters so that pilots can prioritize critical flight safety information from other airspace system information; and

“(D)

to specify the times during which temporary flight restrictions are in effect and the duration of a designation of special use airspace in a specific area.

“(b)

Goals of Program.—

The goals of the NOTAM Improvement Program are—

“(1)

to decrease the overwhelming volume of NOTAMs an airman receives when retrieving airman information prior to a flight in the national airspace system;

“(2)

make the NOTAMs more specific and relevant to the airman’s route and in a format that is more useable to the airman;

“(3)

to provide a full set of NOTAM results in addition to specific information requested by airmen;

“(4)

to provide a document that is easily searchable; and

“(5)

to provide a filtering mechanism similar to that provided by the Department of Defense Notices to Airmen.

“(c)

Advice From Private Sector Groups.—

The Administrator shall establish a NOTAM Improvement Panel, which shall be comprised of representatives of relevant nonprofit and not-for-profit general aviation pilot groups, to advise the Administrator in carrying out the goals of the NOTAM Improvement Program under this section.

“(d)

Designation of Repository as Sole Source for NOTAMs.—

“(1)

In general.—

The Administrator—

“(A)

shall consider the repository for NOTAMs under subsection (a)(2)(B) to be the sole location for airmen to check for NOTAMs; and

“(B)

may not consider a NOTAM to be announced or published until the NOTAM is included in the repository for NOTAMs under subsection (a)(2)(B).

“(2)

Prohibition on taking action for violations of notams not in repository.—

“(A)

In general.—

Except as provided in subparagraph (B), beginning on the date that the repository under subsection (a)(2)(B) is final and published, the Administrator may not take any enforcement action against an airman for a violation of a NOTAM during a flight if—

“(i)

that NOTAM is not available through the repository before the commencement of the flight; and

“(ii)

that NOTAM is not reasonably accessible and identifiable to the airman.

“(B)

Exception for national security.—

Subparagraph (A) shall not apply in the case of an enforcement action for a violation of a NOTAM that directly relates to national security.”

Consistency of Regulatory Interpretation

Pub. L. 112–95, title III, § 313, Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 67, provided that:

“(a)

Establishment of Advisory Panel.—

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Feb. 14, 2012], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall establish an advisory panel comprised of both Government and industry representatives to—

“(1)

review the October 2010 report by the Government Accountability Office on certification and approval processes (GAO–11–14); and

“(2)

develop recommendations to address the findings in the report and other concerns raised by interested parties, including representatives of the aviation industry.

“(b)

Matters To Be Considered.—

The advisory panel shall—

“(1)

determine the root causes of inconsistent interpretation of regulations by the Administration’s Flight Standards Service and Aircraft Certification Service;

“(2)

develop recommendations to improve the consistency of interpreting regulations by the Administration’s Flight Standards Service and Aircraft Certification Service; and

“(3)

develop recommendations to improve communications between the Administration’s Flight Standards Service and Aircraft Certification Service and applicants and certificate and approval holders for the identification and resolution of potentially adverse issues in an expeditious and fair manner.

“(c)

Report to Congress.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Feb. 14, 2012], the Administrator shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the findings of the advisory panel, together with an explanation of how the Administrator will implement the recommendations of the advisory panel and measure the effectiveness of the recommendations.”

Flight Standards Evaluation Program

Pub. L. 112–95, title III, § 315, Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 68, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Feb. 14, 2012], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall modify the Flight Standards Evaluation Program—

“(1)

to include periodic and random reviews as part of the Administration’s oversight of air carriers; and

“(2)

to prohibit an individual from participating in a review or audit of an office with responsibility for an air carrier under the program if the individual, at any time in the 5-year period preceding the date of the review or audit, had responsibility for inspecting, or overseeing the inspection of, the operations of that carrier.

“(b)

Annual Report to Congress.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Feb. 14, 2012], and annually thereafter, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the Flight Standards Evaluation Program, including the Administrator’s findings and recommendations with respect to the program.

“(c)

Flight Standards Evaluation Program Defined.—

In this section, the term ‘Flight Standards Evaluation Program’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in FS 1100.1B CHG3, including any subsequent revisions thereto.”

Review of Air Transportation Oversight System Database

Pub. L. 112–95, title III, § 343, Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 80, provided that:

“(a)

Reviews.—

The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall establish a process by which the air transportation oversight system database of the Administration is reviewed by regional teams of employees of the Administration, including at least one employee on each team representing aviation safety inspectors, on a monthly basis to ensure that—

“(1)

any trends in regulatory compliance are identified; and

“(2)

appropriate corrective actions are taken in accordance with Administration regulations, advisory directives, policies, and procedures.

“(b)

Monthly Team Reports.—

“(1)

In general.—

A regional team of employees conducting a monthly review of the air transportation oversight system database under subsection (a) shall submit to the Administrator, the Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety, and the Director of Flight Standards Service a report each month on the results of the review.

“(2)

Contents.—

A report submitted under paragraph (1) shall identify—

“(A)

any trends in regulatory compliance discovered by the team of employees in conducting the monthly review; and

“(B)

any corrective actions taken or proposed to be taken in response to the trends.

“(c)

Biannual Reports to Congress.—

The Administrator, on a biannual basis, shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the results of the reviews of the air transportation oversight system database conducted under this section, including copies of reports received under subsection (b).”

Duty Periods and Flight Time Limitations Applicable to Flight Crewmembers

Pub. L. 112–95, title III, § 345, Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 81, which provided for rulemaking proceedings relating to duty periods and flight time limitations applicable to flight crewmembers, was repealed by Pub. L. 118–63, title II, § 218(l), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1056.

Safety Critical Staffing

Pub. L. 112–95, title VI, § 606, Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 113, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than October 1, 2012, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall implement, in as cost-effective a manner as possible, the staffing model for aviation safety inspectors developed pursuant to the National Academy of Sciences study entitled ‘Staffing Standards for Aviation Safety Inspectors’. In doing so, the Administrator shall consult with interested persons, including the exclusive bargaining representative for aviation safety inspectors certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code.

“(b)

Report.—

Not later than January 1 of each year beginning after September 30, 2012, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the staffing model described in subsection (a).”

Air Transportation of Lithium Cells and Batteries

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 333, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3274, provided that:

“(a)

Harmonization With ICAO Technical Instructions.—

“(1)

Adoption of icao instructions.—

“(A)

In general.—

Pursuant to section 828 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 [Pub. L. 112–95] (49 U.S.C. 44701 note), not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Secretary of Transportation shall conform United States regulations on the air transport of lithium cells and batteries with the lithium cells and battery requirements in the 2015–2016 edition of the International Civil Aviation Organization’s (referred to in this subsection as ‘ICAO’) Technical Instructions (to include all addenda), including the revised standards adopted by ICAO which became effective on April 1, 2016 and any further revisions adopted by ICAO prior to the effective date of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 [probably means Oct. 5, 2018].

“(B)

Further proceedings.—

Beginning on the date the revised regulations under subparagraph (A) are published in the Federal Register, any lithium cell and battery rulemaking action or update commenced on or after that date shall continue to comply with the requirements under section 828 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 44701 note).

“(2)

Review of other regulations.—

Pursuant to section 828 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 44701 note), the Secretary of Transportation may initiate a review of other existing regulations regarding the air transportation, including passenger-carrying and cargo aircraft, of lithium batteries and cells.

“(b)

Medical Device Batteries.—

“(1)

In general.—

For United States applicants, the Secretary of Transportation shall consider and either grant or deny, not later than 45 days after receipt of an application, an application submitted in compliance with part 107 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, for special permits or approvals for air transportation of lithium ion cells or batteries specifically used by medical devices. Not later than 30 days after the date of application, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration shall provide a draft special permit to the Federal Aviation Administration based on the application. The Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct an on-site inspection for issuance of the special permit not later than 20 days after the date of receipt of the draft special permit from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

“(2)

Limited exceptions to restrictions on air transportation of medical device batteries.—

The Secretary shall issue limited exceptions to the restrictions on transportation of lithium ion and lithium metal batteries to allow the shipment on a passenger aircraft of not more than 2 replacement batteries specifically used for a medical device if—

“(A)

the intended destination of the batteries is not serviced daily by cargo aircraft if a battery is required for medically necessary care; and

“(B)

with regard to a shipper of lithium ion or lithium metal batteries for medical devices that cannot comply with a charge limitation in place at the time, each battery is—

“(i)

individually packed in an inner packaging that completely encloses the battery;

“(ii)

placed in a rigid outer packaging; and

“(iii)

protected to prevent a short circuit.

“(3)

Medial [sic] device defined.—

ln [sic] this subsection, the term ‘medical device’ means an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, or in vitro reagent, including any component, part, or accessory thereof, which is intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, of a person.

“(4)

Savings clause.—

Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as expanding or constricting any other authority the Secretary of Transportation has under section 828 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 44701 note).

“(c)

Lithium Battery Safety Working Group.—

“(1)

In general.—

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Secretary of Transportation shall establish a lithium battery safety working group (referred to as the ‘working group’ in this section) to promote and coordinate efforts related to the promotion of the safe manufacture, use, and transportation of lithium batteries and cells.

“(2)

Duties.—

The working group shall coordinate and facilitate the transfer of knowledge and expertise among the following Federal agencies:

“(A)

The Department of Transportation.

“(B)

The Consumer Product Safety Commission.

“(C)

The National Institute on Standards and Technology.

“(D)

The Food and Drug Administration.

“(3)

Members.—

The Secretary shall appoint not more than 8 members to the working group with expertise in the safe manufacture, use, or transportation of lithium batteries and cells.

“(4)

Subcommittees.—

The Secretary, or members of the working group, may—

“(A)

establish working group subcommittees to focus on specific issues related to the safe manufacture, use, or transportation of lithium batteries and cells; and

“(B)

include in a subcommittee the participation of nonmember stakeholders with expertise in areas that the Secretary or members consider necessary.

“(5)

Report.—

Not later than 1 year after the date it is established, the working group shall—

“(A)

identify and assess—

“(i)

additional ways to decrease the risk of fires and explosions from lithium batteries and cells;

“(ii)

additional ways to ensure uniform transportation requirements for both bulk and individual batteries; and

“(iii)

new or existing technologies that may reduce the fire and explosion risk of lithium batteries and cells; and

“(B)

transmit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the assessments conducted under subparagraph (A), including any legislative recommendations to effectuate the safety improvements described in clauses (i) through (iii) of that subparagraph.

“(6)

Termination.—

The working group, and any working group subcommittees, shall terminate 90 days after the date the report is transmitted under paragraph (5).

“(d)

Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee.—

“(1)

Establishment.—

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Secretary shall establish, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act ([former] 5 U.S.C. App.) [see 5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.], a lithium ion and lithium metal battery air safety advisory committee (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Committee’).

“(2)

Duties.—

The Committee shall—

“(A)

facilitate communication between manufacturers of lithium ion and lithium metal cells and batteries, manufacturers of products incorporating both large and small lithium ion and lithium metal batteries, air carriers, and the Federal Government regarding the safe air transportation of lithium ion and lithium metal cells and batteries and the effectiveness and economic and social impacts of the regulation of such transportation;

“(B)

provide the Secretary, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration with timely information about new lithium ion and lithium metal battery technology and transportation safety practices and methodologies;

“(C)

provide a forum for the Secretary to provide information on and to discuss the activities of the Department of Transportation relating to lithium ion and lithium metal battery transportation safety, the policies underlying the activities, and positions to be advocated in international forums;

“(D)

provide a forum for the Secretary to provide information and receive advice on—

“(i)

activities carried out throughout the world to communicate and enforce relevant United States regulations and the ICAO Technical Instructions; and

“(ii)

the effectiveness of the activities;

“(E)

provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary with respect to lithium ion and lithium metal battery air transportation safety, including how best to implement activities to increase awareness of relevant requirements and their importance to travelers and shippers; and

“(F)

review methods to decrease the risk posed by air shipment of undeclared hazardous materials and efforts to educate those who prepare and offer hazardous materials for shipment via air transport.

“(3)

Membership.—

The Committee shall be composed of the following members:

“(A)

Individuals appointed by the Secretary to represent—

“(i)

large volume manufacturers of lithium ion and lithium metal cells and batteries;

“(ii)

domestic manufacturers of lithium ion and lithium metal batteries or battery packs;

“(iii)

manufacturers of consumer products powered by lithium ion and lithium metal batteries;

“(iv)

manufacturers of vehicles powered by lithium ion and lithium metal batteries;

“(v)

marketers of products powered by lithium ion and lithium metal batteries;

“(vi)

cargo air service providers based in the United States;

“(vii)

passenger air service providers based in the United States;

“(viii)

pilots and employees of air service providers described in clauses (vi) and (vii);

“(ix)

shippers of lithium ion and lithium metal batteries for air transportation;

“(x)

manufacturers of battery-powered medical devices or batteries used in medical devices; and

“(xi)

employees of the Department of Transportation, including employees of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

“(B)

Representatives of such other Government departments and agencies as the Secretary determines appropriate.

“(C)

Any other individuals the Secretary determines are appropriate to comply with Federal law.

“(4)

Report.—

“(A)

In general.—

Not later than 180 days after the establishment of the Committee, the Committee shall submit to the Secretary and the appropriate committees of Congress a report that—

“(i)

describes and evaluates the steps being taken in the private sector and by international regulatory authorities to implement and enforce requirements relating to the safe transportation by air of bulk shipments of lithium ion cells and batteries; and

“(ii)

identifies any areas of enforcement or regulatory requirements for which there is consensus that greater attention is needed.

“(B)

Independent statements.—

Each member of the Committee shall be provided an opportunity to submit an independent statement of views with the report submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A).

“(5)

Meetings.—

“(A)

In general.—

The Committee shall meet at the direction of the Secretary and at least twice a year.

“(B)

Preparation for icao meetings.—

Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall convene a meeting of the Committee in connection with and in advance of each meeting of the International Civil Aviation Organization, or any of its panels or working groups, addressing the safety of air transportation of lithium ion and lithium metal batteries to brief Committee members on positions to be taken by the United States at such meeting and provide Committee members a meaningful opportunity to comment.

“(6)

Termination.—

The Committee shall terminate on the date that is 6 years after the date on which the Committee is established.

“(7)

Termination of future of aviation advisory committee.—

The Future of Aviation Advisory Committee shall terminate on the date on which the lithium ion battery air safety advisory committee is established.

“(e)

Cooperative Efforts to Ensure Compliance With Safety Regulations.—

“(1)

In general.—

The Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with appropriate Federal agencies, shall carry out cooperative efforts to ensure that shippers who offer lithium ion and lithium metal batteries for air transport to or from the United States comply with U.S. Hazardous Materials Regulations and ICAO Technical Instructions.

“(2)

Cooperative efforts.—

The cooperative efforts the Secretary shall carry out pursuant to paragraph (1) include the following:

“(A)

Encouraging training programs at locations outside the United States from which substantial cargo shipments of lithium ion or lithium metal batteries originate for manufacturers, freight forwarders, and other shippers and potential shippers of lithium ion and lithium metal batteries.

“(B)

Working with Federal, regional, and international transportation agencies to ensure enforcement of U.S. Hazardous Materials Regulations and ICAO Technical Instructions with respect to shippers who offer noncompliant shipments of lithium ion and lithium metal batteries.

“(C)

Sharing information, as appropriate, with Federal, regional, and international transportation agencies regarding noncompliant shipments.

“(D)

Pursuing a joint effort with the international aviation community to develop a process to obtain assurances that appropriate enforcement actions are taken to reduce the likelihood of noncompliant shipments, especially with respect to jurisdictions in which enforcement activities historically have been limited.

“(E)

Providing information in brochures and on the internet in appropriate foreign languages and dialects that describes the actions required to comply with U.S. Hazardous Materials Regulations and ICAO Technical Instructions.

“(F)

Developing joint efforts with the international aviation community to promote a better understanding of the requirements of and methods of compliance with U.S. Hazardous Materials Regulations and ICAO Technical Instructions.

“(3)

Reporting.—

Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 2 years, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on compliance with the policy set forth in subsection (e) and the cooperative efforts carried out, or planned to be carried out, under this subsection.

“(f)

Packaging Improvements.—

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with interested stakeholders, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an evaluation of current practices for the packaging of lithium ion batteries and cells for air transportation, including recommendations, if any, to improve the packaging of such batteries and cells for air transportation in a safe, efficient, and cost-effective manner.

“(g)

Department of Transportation Policy on International Representation.—

“(1)

In general.—

It shall be the policy of the Department of Transportation to support the participation of industry and labor stakeholders in all panels and working groups of the dangerous goods panel of the ICAO and any other international test or standard setting organization that considers proposals on the safety or transportation of lithium ion and lithium metal batteries in which the United States participates.

“(2)

Participation.—

The Secretary of Transportation shall request that as part of the ICAO deliberations in the dangerous goods panel on these issues, that appropriate experts on issues under consideration be allowed to participate.

“(h)

Definitions.—

In this section, the following definitions apply:

“(1)

ICAO technical instructions.—

The term ‘ICAO Technical Instructions’ has the meaning given that term in section 828(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 44701 note).

“(2)

U.S. hazardous materials regulations.—

The term ‘U.S. Hazardous Materials Regulations’ means the regulations in parts 100 through 177 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (including amendments adopted after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018]).”

Pub. L. 112–95, title VIII, § 828, Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 133, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

The Secretary of Transportation, including a designee of the Secretary, may not issue or enforce any regulation or other requirement regarding the transportation by aircraft of lithium metal cells or batteries or lithium ion cells or batteries, whether transported separately or packed with or contained in equipment, if the requirement is more stringent than the requirements of the ICAO Technical Instructions.

“(b)

Exceptions.—

“(1)

Passenger carrying aircraft.—

Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary may enforce the prohibition on transporting primary (non-rechargeable) lithium batteries and cells aboard passenger carrying aircraft set forth in special provision A100 under section 172.102(c)(2) of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Feb. 14, 2012]).

“(2)

Credible reports.—

Notwithstanding subsection (a), if the Secretary obtains a credible report with respect to a safety incident from a national or international governmental regulatory or investigating body that demonstrates that the presence of lithium metal cells or batteries or lithium ion cells or batteries on an aircraft, whether transported separately or packed with or contained in equipment, in accordance with the requirements of the ICAO Technical Instructions, has substantially contributed to the initiation or propagation of an onboard fire, the Secretary—

“(A)

may issue and enforce an emergency regulation, more stringent than the requirements of the ICAO Technical Instructions, that governs the transportation by aircraft of such cells or batteries, if that regulation—

“(i)

addresses solely deficiencies referenced in the report; and

“(ii)

is effective for not more than 1 year; and

“(B)

may adopt and enforce a permanent regulation, more stringent than the requirements of the ICAO Technical Instructions, that governs the transportation by aircraft of such cells or batteries, if—

“(i)

the Secretary bases the regulation upon substantial credible evidence that the otherwise permissible presence of such cells or batteries would substantially contribute to the initiation or propagation of an onboard fire;

“(ii)

the regulation addresses solely the deficiencies in existing regulations; and

“(iii)

the regulation imposes the least disruptive and least expensive variation from existing requirements while adequately addressing identified deficiencies.

“(c)

ICAO Technical Instructions Defined.—

In this section, the term ‘ICAO Technical Instructions’ means the International Civil Aviation Organization Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (as amended, including amendments adopted after the date of enactment of this Act [Feb. 14, 2012]).”

Airline Safety and Pilot Training Improvement

Pub. L. 111–216, title II, Aug. 1, 2010, 124 Stat. 2350, as amended by Pub. L. 111–249, § 6, Sept. 30, 2010, 124 Stat. 2628; Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(a)(315), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4340, provided that:

“SEC. 201.

DEFINITIONS.

“(a)

[sic] Definitions.—

In this title, the following definitions apply:

“(1)

Advanced qualification program.—

The term ‘advanced qualification program’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120–54A, dated June 23, 2006, including any subsequent revisions thereto.

“(2)

Air carrier.—

The term ‘air carrier’ has the meaning given that term in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code.

“(3)

Aviation safety action program.—

The term ‘aviation safety action program’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120–66B, dated November 15, 2002, including any subsequent revisions thereto.

“(4)

Flight crewmember.—

The term ‘flight crewmember’ has the meaning given the term ‘flightcrew member’ in part 1 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(5)

Flight operational quality assurance program.—

The term ‘flight operational quality assurance program’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120–82, dated

FAA Inspector Training

Pub. L. 108–176, title V, § 506, Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2560, provided that:

“(a)

Study.—

“(1)

In general.—

The Comptroller General shall conduct a study of the training of the aviation safety inspectors of the Federal Aviation Administration (in this section referred to as ‘FAA inspectors’).

“(2)

Contents.—

The study shall include—

“(A)

an analysis of the type of training provided to FAA inspectors;

“(B)

actions that the Federal Aviation Administration has undertaken to ensure that FAA inspectors receive up-to-date training on the latest technologies;

“(C)

the extent of FAA inspector training provided by the aviation industry and whether such training is provided without charge or on a quid pro quo basis; and

“(D)

the amount of travel that is required of FAA inspectors in receiving training.

“(3)

Report.—

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 12, 2003], the Comptroller General shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the results of the study.

“(b)

Sense of the House.—

It is the sense of the House of Representatives that—

“(1)

FAA inspectors should be encouraged to take the most up-to-date initial and recurrent training on the latest aviation technologies;

“(2)

FAA inspector training should have a direct relation to an individual’s job requirements; and

“(3)

if possible, a FAA inspector should be allowed to take training at the location most convenient for the inspector.

“(c)

Workload of Inspectors.—

“(1)

Study by national academy of sciences.—

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 12, 2003], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall make appropriate arrangements for the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study of the assumptions and methods used by the Federal Aviation Administration to estimate staffing standards for FAA inspectors to ensure proper oversight over the aviation industry, including the designee program.

“(2)

Contents.—

The study shall include the following:

“(A)

A suggested method of modifying FAA inspectors staffing models for application to current local conditions or applying some other approach to developing an objective staffing standard.

“(B)

The approximate cost and length of time for developing such models.

“(3)

Report.—

Not later than 12 months after the initiation of the arrangements under subsection (a), the National Academy of Sciences shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the study.”

Air Transportation Oversight System

Pub. L. 106–181, title V, § 513, Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 144, provided that:

“(a)

Report.—

Not later than August 1, 2000, the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the progress of the Federal Aviation Administration in implementing the air transportation oversight system, including in detail the training of inspectors under the system, the number of inspectors using the system, air carriers subject to the system, and the budget for the system.

“(b)

Required Contents.—

At a minimum, the report shall indicate—

“(1)

any funding or staffing constraints that would adversely impact the Administration’s ability to continue to develop and implement the air transportation oversight system;

“(2)

progress in integrating the aviation safety data derived from such system’s inspections with existing aviation data of the Administration in the safety performance analysis system of the Administration; and

“(3)

the Administration’s efforts in collaboration with the aviation industry to develop and validate safety performance measures and appropriate risk weightings for such system.

“(c)

Update.—

Not later than August 1, 2002, the Administrator shall update the report submitted under this section and transmit the updated report to the committees referred to in subsection (a).”

Regulation of Alaska Guide Pilots

Pub. L. 106–181, title VII, § 732, Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 168, as amended by Pub. L. 118–63, title II, § 218(h), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1056, provided that:

“(a)

In General.—

Beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 5, 2000], flight operations conducted by Alaska guide pilots shall be regulated under the general operating and flight rules contained in part 91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

“(b)

Definition of Alaska Guide Pilot.—

In this section the term ‘Alaska guide pilot’ means a pilot who—

“(1)

conducts aircraft operations over or within the State of Alaska;

“(2)

operates single engine, fixed-wing aircraft on floats, wheels, or skis, providing commercial hunting, fishing, or other guide services and related accommodations in the form of camps or lodges; and

“(3)

transports clients by such aircraft incidental to hunting, fishing, or other guide services.”

Aviation Medical Assistance

Pub. L. 105–170, Apr. 24, 1998, 112 Stat. 47, provided that:

“SECTION 1.

SHORT TITLE.

“This Act may be cited as the ‘Aviation Medical Assistance Act of 1998’.

“SEC. 2.

MEDICAL KIT EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING.

“Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1998], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall reevaluate regulations regarding: (1) the equipment required to be carried in medical kits of aircraft operated by air carriers; and (2) the training required of flight attendants in the use of such equipment, and, if the Administrator determines that such regulations should be modified as a result of such reevaluation, shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to modify such regulations.

“SEC. 3.

REPORTS REGARDING DEATHS ON AIRCRAFT.

“(a)

In General.—

During the 1-year period beginning on the 90th day following the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1998], a major air carrier shall make a good faith effort to obtain, and shall submit quarterly reports to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration on, the following:

“(1)

The number of persons who died on aircraft of the air carrier, including any person who was declared dead after being removed from such an aircraft as a result of a medical incident that occurred on such aircraft.

“(2)

The age of each such person.

“(3)

Any information concerning cause of death that is available at the time such person died on the aircraft or is removed from the aircraft or that subsequently becomes known to the air carrier.

“(4)

Whether or not the aircraft was diverted as a result of the death or incident.

“(5)

Such other information as the Administrator may request as necessary to aid in a decision as to whether or not to require automatic external defibrillators in airports or on aircraft operated by air carriers, or both.

“(b)

Format.—

The Administrator may specify a format for reports to be submitted under this section.

“SEC. 4.

DECISION ON AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS.

“(a)

In General.—

Not later than 120 days after the last day of the 1-year period described in section 3, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall make a decision on whether or not to require automatic external defibrillators on passenger aircraft operated by air carriers and whether or not to require automatic external defibrillators at airports.

“(b)

Form of Decision.—

A decision under this section shall be in the form of a notice of proposed rulemaking requiring automatic external defibrillators in airports or on passenger aircraft operated by air carriers, or both, or a recommendation to Congress for legislation requiring such defibrillators or a notice in the Federal Register that such defibrillators should not be required in airports or on such aircraft. If a decision under this section is in the form of a notice of proposed rulemaking, the Administrator shall make a final decision not later than the 120th day following the date on which comments are due on the notice of proposed rulemaking.

“(c)

Contents.—

If the Administrator decides that automatic external defibrillators should be required—

“(1)

on passenger aircraft operated by air carriers, the proposed rulemaking or recommendation shall include—

“(A)

the size of the aircraft on which such defibrillators should be required;

“(B)

the class flights (whether interstate, overseas, or foreign air transportation or any combination thereof) on which such defibrillators should be required;

“(C)

the training that should be required for air carrier personnel in the use of such defibrillators; and

“(D)

the associated equipment and medication that should be required to be carried in the aircraft medical kit; and

“(2)

at airports, the proposed rulemaking or recommendation shall include—

“(A)

the size of the airport at which such defibrillators should be required;

“(B)

the training that should be required for airport personnel in the use of such defibrillators; and

“(C)

the associated equipment and medication that should be required at the airport.

“(d)

Limitation.—

The Administrator may not require automatic external defibrillators on helicopters and on aircraft with a maximum payload capacity (as defined in section 119.3 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations) of 7,500 pounds or less.

“(e)

Special Rule.—

If the Administrator decides that automatic external defibrillators should be required at airports, the proposed rulemaking or recommendation shall provide that the airports are responsible for providing the defibrillators.

“SEC. 5.

LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY.

“(a)

Liability of Air Carriers.—

An air carrier shall not be liable for damages in any action brought in a Federal or State court arising out of the performance of the air carrier in obtaining or attempting to obtain the assistance of a passenger in an in-flight medical emergency, or out of the acts or omissions of the passenger rendering the assistance, if the passenger is not an employee or agent of the carrier and the carrier in good faith believes that the passenger is a medically qualified individual.

“(b)

Liability of Individuals.—

An individual shall not be liable for damages in any action brought in a Federal or State court arising out of the acts or omissions of the individual in providing or attempting to provide assistance in the case of an in-flight medical emergency unless the individual, while rendering such assistance, is guilty of gross negligence or willful misconduct.

“SEC. 6.

DEFINITIONS.

“In this Act—

“(1)

the terms ‘air carrier’, ‘aircraft’, ‘airport’, ‘interstate air transportation’, ‘overseas air transportation’, and ‘foreign air transportation’ have the meanings such terms have under section 40102 of title 49, United States Code;

“(2)

the term ‘major air carrier’ means an air carrier certificated under section 41102 of title 49, United States Code, that accounted for at least 1 percent of domestic scheduled-passenger revenues in the 12 months ending March 31 of the most recent year preceding the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1998], as reported to the Department of Transportation pursuant to part 241 of title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and

“(3)

the term ‘medically qualified individual’ includes any person who is licensed, certified, or otherwise qualified to provide medical care in a State, including a physician, nurse, physician assistant, paramedic, and emergency medical technician.”

Definitions

Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 301, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3260, provided that: “In this title [see Tables for classification], the following definitions apply:

“(1)

Administrator.—

The term ‘Administrator’ means the Administrator of the FAA.

“(2)

FAA.—

The term ‘FAA’ means the Federal Aviation Administration.”