A prior section 10 of act
1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–237, § 1006(b)(3)(J), substituted “the applicant’s” for “his”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–237, § 1006(b)(2), substituted “the Administrator’s” for “his”.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–237, § 1006(b)(1), substituted “the Administrator” for “he” before “shall notify”.
1988—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–532 in par. (1), substituted “public. The use” for “public: Provided, That the use” and “title. This paragraph” for “title: Provided further, That this paragraph”, and in par. (3), “notice. Where” for “notice: Provided, That where”.
1984—Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provisions requiring the court to give expedited consideration to actions involving injunctions or limitations of proposed disclosure.
1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–396, § 15(1), made disclosure of information by the Administrator subject to the limitations of subsecs. (d) and (e) of this section.
Subsecs. (d) to (g). Pub. L. 95–396, § 15(2), added subsecs. (d) to (g).
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–532 effective on expiration of 60 days after
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on
For effective date of section, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–516, set out as a note under section 136 of this title.