§ 1117.
(b)
Treble damages for use of counterfeit mark
In assessing damages under subsection (a) for any violation of
section 1114(1)(a) of this title or
section 220506 of title 36, in a case involving use of a counterfeit mark or designation (as defined in
section 1116(d) of this title), the court shall, unless the court finds extenuating circumstances, enter judgment for three times such profits or damages, whichever amount is greater, together with a reasonable attorney’s fee, if the violation consists of—
(1)
intentionally using a mark or designation, knowing such mark or designation is a counterfeit mark (as defined in
section 1116(d) of this title), in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of goods or services; or
(2)
providing goods or services necessary to the commission of a violation specified in paragraph (1), with the intent that the recipient of the goods or services would put the goods or services to use in committing the violation.
In such a case, the court may award prejudgment interest on such amount at an annual interest rate established under
section 6621(a)(2) of title 26, beginning on the date of the service of the claimant’s pleadings setting forth the claim for such entry of judgment and ending on the date such entry is made, or for such shorter time as the court considers appropriate.
(c)
Statutory damages for use of counterfeit marks
In a case involving the use of a counterfeit mark (as defined in
section 1116(d) of this title) in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of goods or services, the plaintiff may elect, at any time before final judgment is rendered by the trial court, to recover, instead of actual damages and profits under subsection (a), an award of statutory damages for any such use in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of goods or services in the amount of—
(1)
not less than $1,000 or more than $200,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods or services sold, offered for sale, or distributed, as the court considers just; or
(2)
if the court finds that the use of the counterfeit mark was willful, not more than $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods or services sold, offered for sale, or distributed, as the court considers just.
([July 5, 1946, ch. 540], title VI, § 35, [60 Stat. 439]; [Pub. L. 87–772, § 19], Oct. 9, 1962, [76 Stat. 774]; [Pub. L. 93–596, § 1], Jan. 2, 1975, [88 Stat. 1949]; [Pub. L. 93–600, § 3], Jan. 2, 1975, [88 Stat. 1955]; [Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1503(2)], Oct. 12, 1984, [98 Stat. 2182]; [Pub. L. 99–514, § 2], Oct. 22, 1986, [100 Stat. 2095]; [Pub. L. 100–667, title I, § 129], Nov. 16, 1988, [102 Stat. 3945]; [Pub. L. 104–153, § 7], July 2, 1996, [110 Stat. 1388]; [Pub. L. 106–43, § 3(b)], Aug. 5, 1999, [113 Stat. 219]; [Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title III, § 3003(a)(2), (b)]], Nov. 29, 1999, [113 Stat. 1536], 1501A–549; [Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13207(a)], (b)(11), Nov. 2, 2002, [116 Stat. 1906], 1908; [Pub. L. 108–482, title II, § 202], Dec. 23, 2004, [118 Stat. 3916]; [Pub. L. 110–403, title I], §§ 103, 104, Oct. 13, 2008, [122 Stat. 4259].)