(i)
In general.—
In carrying out this paragraph, the lead agency shall reduce duplication, to the maximum extent practicable, between—
(I)
the evaluation of alternatives under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and
(II)
the evaluation of alternatives in the metropolitan transportation planning process under section 134 or an environmental review process carried out under State law (referred to in this subparagraph as a “State environmental review process”).
(ii)
Consideration of alternatives.—
The lead agency may eliminate from detailed consideration an alternative proposed in an environmental impact statement regarding a project if, as determined by the lead agency—
(I)
the alternative was considered in a metropolitan planning process or a State environmental review process by a metropolitan planning organization or a State or local transportation agency, as applicable;
(II)
the lead agency provided guidance to the metropolitan planning organization or State or local transportation agency, as applicable, regarding analysis of alternatives in the metropolitan planning process or State environmental review process, including guidance on the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and any other Federal law necessary for approval of the project;
(III)
the applicable metropolitan planning process or State environmental review process included an opportunity for public review and comment;
(IV)
the applicable metropolitan planning organization or State or local transportation agency rejected the alternative after considering public comments;
(V)
the Federal lead agency independently reviewed the alternative evaluation approved by the applicable metropolitan planning organization or State or local transportation agency; and
(VI)
the Federal lead agency determined—
(aa)
in consultation with Federal participating or cooperating agencies, that the alternative to be eliminated from consideration is not necessary for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); or
(bb)
with the concurrence of Federal agencies with jurisdiction over a permit or approval required for a project, that the alternative to be eliminated from consideration is not necessary for any permit or approval under any other Federal law.