1. Commerce does not automatically conduct administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. Instead, reviews must be requested pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213.

2. Commerce has not received a request for an administrative review of the antidumping duty order for the period and on the merchandise identified below except for the firms listed in paragraph 3. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c), you are to liquidate all entries for all firms except those listed in paragraph 3 and assess antidumping duties on merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption at the cash deposit or bonding rate in effect on the date of entry:

Product: Silicomanganese
Country: Ukraine
Case number: A-462-305
Period: 08/01/2015 through 07/31/2016

3. Entries of merchandise of the firms listed below should not be liquidated until specific instructions are issued. Continue to suspend liquidation of all entries of merchandise produced and/or exported by the listed firms entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period 08/01/2015 through 07/31/2016:

Company: PJSC Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant
Case number: No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Entries may have been made under A-462-305-000.
Note to CBP: In the initiation notice (81 FR 71061, 10/14/2016), Commerce inadvertently listed the period of review as 08/01/2014 through 07/31/2015. Commerce did receive a request for review covering the period 08/01/2015 through 07/31/2016 with respect to this company. This error will be corrected in the September initiation notice.

Company: PJSC Zaporozhye Ferroalloy Plant
Case number: No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Entries may have been made under A-462-305-000.
Note to CBP: The initiation notice (81 FR 71061, 10/14/2016) lists the company as PJSC Nikopol Ferrolloy Plant. Additionally, in the initiation notice, Commerce inadvertently listed the period of review as 08/01/2014 through 07/31/2015. Commerce did receive a request for review covering the period 08/01/2015 through 07/31/2016 with respect to this company. These errors will be corrected in the September initiation notice.

4. There are no injunctions applicable to the entries covered by this instruction.

5. Notice of the lifting of suspension of liquidation of entries of subject merchandise covered by paragraph 2 occurred with the publication of the notice of initiation of administrative review for the 08/2016 anniversary month (81 FR 71061, 10/14/2016). Unless instructed otherwise, for all other shipments of silicomanganese from the Ukraine you shall continue to collect cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties for the merchandise at the current rates.

6. The assessment of antidumping duties by CBP on shipments or entries of this merchandise is subject to the provisions of section 778 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Section 778 requires that CBP pay interest on overpayments or assess interest on underpayments of the required amounts deposited as estimated antidumping duties. The interest provisions are not applicable to cash or bonds posted as estimated antidumping duties before the date of publication of the antidumping duty order. Interest shall be calculated from the date payment of estimated antidumping duties is required through the date of liquidation. The rate at which such interest is payable is the rate in effect under section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 for such period.

7. Upon assessment of antidumping duties, CBP shall require that the importer provide a reimbursement statement, as described in section 351.402(f)(2) of Commerce's regulations. The importer should provide the reimbursement statement prior to liquidation of the entry. If the importer certifies that it has an agreement with the producer, seller, or exporter to be reimbursed antidumping duties, CBP shall double the antidumping duties in accordance with the above-referenced regulation. Additionally, if the importer does not provide the reimbursement statement prior to liquidation, reimbursement shall be presumed and CBP shall double the antidumping duties due. If an importer timely files a protest challenging the presumption of reimbursement and doubling of duties, consistent with CBP's protest process, CBP may accept the reimbursement statement filed with the protest to rebut the presumption of reimbursement.

8. If there are any questions by the importing public regarding this message, please contact the Call Center for the Office of AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-0984. CBP ports should submit their inquiries through authorized CBP channels only. (This message was generated by OI:JF.)

9. There are no restrictions on the release of this information.

Alexander Amdur