| For—
| For the following emission limitation—
| You have demonstrated initial compliance if—
|
|---|
| 1. Each blowing still, Group 1 asphalt loading rack, and Group 1 asphalt storage tank, at existing, new, and reconstructed asphalt processing facilities | a. Reduce total hydrocarbon mass emissions by 95 percent or to a concentration of 20 ppmv, on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen | i. The total hydrocarbon emissions, determined using the equations in § 63.8687 and the test methods and procedures in Table 3 to this subpart, over the period of the performance test are reduced by at least 95 percent by weight or to a concentration of 20 ppmv, on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen; and
ii. You have a record of the average control device operating parameters
a over the performance test during which emissions were reduced according to 1.a.i. of this table.
|
| | b. Route the emissions to a combustion device achieving a combustion efficiency of 99.5 percent | i. The combustion efficiency of the combustion device, determined using the equations in § 63.8687 and the test methods and procedures in Table 3 to this subpart, over the period of the performance test is at least 99.5 percent; and
ii. You have a record of the average combustion zone temperature
a and carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and total hydrocarbon outlet concentrations over the performance test during which the combustion efficiency was at least 99.5 percent.
|
| | c. Route the emissions to a combustion device that does not use auxiliary fuel achieving a THC destruction efficiency of 95.8 percent | i. The THC destruction efficiency of the combustion device, determined using the equations in § 63.8687 and the test methods and procedures in Table 3 to this subpart, over the period of the performance test is at least 95.8 percent; and
ii. You have a record of the average combustion zone temperature
a and carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and total hydrocarbon outlet concentrations over the performance test during which the THC destruction efficiency was at least 95.8 percent.
|
| | d. Route emissions to a boiler or process heater with a design heat input capacity of 44 MW or greater | You have a record of the boiler or process heater design heat capacity.
|
| | e. Introduce the emissions into the flame zone of a boiler or process heater | You have a record that shows the emissions are being introduced into the boiler or process heater flame zone.
|
| | f. Route emissions to a flare meeting the requirements of § 63.11(b) | You have a record of the flare design and operating requirements.
|
| 2. Each coating mixer, saturator (including wet looper), coater, sealant applicator, adhesive applicator, and Group 1 asphalt storage tank at new and reconstructed asphalt roofing manufacturing lines | a. Reduce total hydrocarbon mass emissions by 95 percent or to a concentration of 20 ppmv, on a dry basis corrected to 3 percent oxygen | See 1.a.i. and ii. of this table.
|
| | b. Route the emissions to a combustion device achieving a combustion efficiency of 99.5 percent | See 1.b.i. and ii. of this table.
|
| | c. Route the emissions to a combustion device that does not use auxiliary fuel achieving a THC destruction efficiency of 95.8 percent | See 1.c.i. and ii. of this table.
|
| | d. Route emissions to a boiler or process heater with a design heat input capacity of 44 MW or greater | See 1.d. of this table.
|
| | e. Introduce the emissions into the flame zone of a boiler or process heater | See 1.e. of this table.
|
| | f. Route emissions to a flare meeting the requirements of § 63.11(b) | See 1.f. of this table.
|
| 3. The total emissions from the coating mixer, saturator (including wet looper), coater, sealant applicator, and adhesive applicator at each existing asphalt roofing manufacturing line | a. Limit PM emissions to 0.04 kg/Mg (0.08 lb/ton) of asphalt shingle or mineral-surfaced roll roofing produced | i. The PM emissions, determined using the equations in § 63.8687 and the test methods and procedures in Table 3 to this subpart, over the period of the performance test are no greater than the applicable emission limitation; and
ii. You have a record of the average control device
a or process parameters over the performance test during which the particulate matter emissions were no greater than the applicable emission limitation.
|
| | b. Limit PM emissions to 0.4 kg/Mg (0.8 lb/ton) of saturated felt or smooth-surfaced roll roofing produced | See 3.a.i. and ii. of this table.
|
| 4. Each saturator (including wet looper) and coater at an existing, new, or reconstructed asphalt roofing manufacturing line | a. Limit visible emissions from the emissions capture system to 20 percent of any period of consecutive valid observations totaling 60 minutes | The visible emissions, measured using EPA test method 22 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter, for any period of consecutive valid observations totaling 60 minutes do not exceed 20 percent.
|
| | b. Limit opacity emissions to 20 percent | The opacity, measured using EPA test method 9 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter, for each of the first 30 6-minute averages does not exceed 20 percent.
|
| 5. Each Group 2 asphalt storage tank at existing, new, and reconstructed asphalt processing facilities and asphalt roofing manufacturing lines | Limit exhaust gases to 0 percent opacity | The opacity, measured using EPA test method 9 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter, for each of the first 30 6-minute averages does not exceed 0 percent.
|