Pg. 1 of 2 • 19 results

Protest/AFR No. 2704-02-101256; Frontier Insurance Company; 19 C.F.R. § 174.14(a) and 174.12(e)(3); amendment to protest; sufficiency of protest

Internal Advice; Protest No. 3901-01-100287; JCM, Ltd. d/b/a Racconto; 19 U.S.C. § 1514(a); HQ 229413 (March 12, 2002); HQ 225382 (July 3, 1995); Mitsubishi Electronic America Inc. v. United States, 44 F.3d 973 (Fed. Cir. 1994); ABC International Traders, Inc. v. United States, 19 CIT 787 (1995); American Hi-Fi International, Inc. v. United States, 936 F. Supp. 1032 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1996); HQ 227653 (October 31, 1997); HQ 229413(March 12, 2002); HQ 226285 (October 10, 1997)

Protest No. 1001-98-104634; antidumping duties; suspension of liquidation; deemed liquidation; 19 U.S.C. §§ 1504(d), 1514(a), & 1677g(a); American Hi-Fi International, Inc. v. United States, 936 F. Supp. 1032 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1996); Nunn-Bush v. United States, 784 F.Supp. 892 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1992); Fujitsu General America, Inc. et. al v. United States, 110 F. Supp. 2d 1061 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2000), aff’d, 283 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2002); International Trading Co v. United States, 281 F.3d 1268 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United States, 106 F.3d 1357(Fed. Cir. 1998); American Permac v. United States, 642 F.Supp. 1187 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1986); United States v. Mexican Petroleum Corporation, 28 C.C.P.A. 90 (1940); Timken Co. v. United States, 37 F.3d 1470(Fed Cir. 1994); HQ 227689 (November 24, 1998); HQ 226263 (December 10, 1996)

Internal Advice; Protest No. 2904-00-100067; Jewel Import Division; 19 U.S.C. § 1514; HQ 225382 (July 3, 1995); Mitsubishi Electronic America Inc. v. United States, 44 F.3d 973 (Fed. Cir. 1994); ABC International Traders, Inc. v. United States, 19 CIT 787, 791 (1995); American Hi-Fi International, Inc. v. United States, 936 F. Supp. 1032, 1037(Ct. Int’l Trade 1996); HQ 226285 (October 10, 1997); HQ 227653 (October 31, 1997) Dear Ms. Maltsberger:

Protest No. 1601-99-100183; Application for Further Review; deemed liquidation;19 U.S.C. § 1504(d); Fujitsu General America, Inc. et. al v. United States, 110 F. Supp. 2d 1061(Ct. Int’l Trade 2000), affirmed, No. 01-0142, 2002 U.S. App. Lexis 4402 (Fed. Cir. March 20, 2002); 19 U.S.C. § 1514; HQ 227793 (November 4, 1998); HQ 228249 (August 23, 1999);Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United States, 951 F. Supp. 241, 249-50 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1996) aff’d 160 F. 3d 1357 (Fed. Cir.1998); Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States, 936 F. Supp. 1084, (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996), reversed in part, 141 F.3d 1116 (Fed. Cir. 1998).

Protest No. 2704-01-101203; Application for Further Review; 19 U.S.C. § 1514; HQ 225382 (July 3, 1995); Mitsubishi Electronic America Inc. v. United States, 44 F.3d 973 (Fed. Cir. 1994); ABC International Traders, Inc. v. United States, 19 CIT 787, 791 (1995); American Hi-Fi International, Inc. v. United States, 936 F. Supp. 1032, 1037(Ct. Int’l Trade 1996); HQ 226285 (October 10, 1997); HQ 227653 (October 31, 1997)

Protest No. 1001-98-104238; Notice to Redeliver; Timeliness

Protest 5301-97-100050; surety protest; collusion; 19 U.S.C. §1514(c)(3)

Application for further review of Protest No. 2704-94- 100047; Notice of Redelivery; Timeliness; HQ 225807; Exportation under Customs supervision

Protest 1001-94-107866; Notice of Redelivery, 19 CFR 141.113;19 CFR 113.62; HQ 224854; HQ 951300.

Pg. 1 of 2 • 19 results
© 2014 CustomsMobile | Disclaimer | Privacy | About