Section 203(2) of title 35, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(C), was redesignated section 203(b) of title 35 by Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(a)(14)(A)(i),
Executive Order No. 12344, referred to in subsec. (d)(2), is set out as a note under section 2511 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
2021—Subsec. (c)(7)(B). Pub. L. 117–58 designated existing provisions as cl. (i), substituted “Subject to clause (ii), the director” for “The director”, and added cl. (II).
2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [div. C, title XXXI, § 3196(a)], substituted “joint work statement or, if permitted by the agency, in an agency-approved annual strategic plan,” for “joint work statement,” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 106–404, in first sentence, inserted “or, subject to section 209 of title 35, may grant a license to an invention which is federally owned, for which a patent application was filed before the signing of the agreement, and directly within the scope of the work under the agreement,” after “under the agreement,”.
Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [div. C, title XXXI, § 3196(b)], added par. (6).
Subsec. (c)(5)(C), (D). Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [div. C, title XXXI, § 3196(c)], redesignated subpar. (D) as (C), struck out “with a small business firm” after “enter into” and inserted “if” after “statement” in cl. (i), added cls. (iv) and (v), and struck out former subpar. (C) which related to the duties of an agency which has contracted with a non-Federal entity to operate a laboratory with respect to review and approval of joint work statements and agreements under this section and with respect to providing the entity with model cooperative research and development agreements.
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–113 amended subsec. (b) generally, to require that laboratory ensure that collaborating party be provided option of choosing exclusive license for pre-negotiated field of use for any invention under agreement or that collaborating party be offered option of holding licensing rights that collectively encompass rights that would be held under such exclusive license by one party, to set forth explicit conditions that grants under par. (1) were to be subject to, and to require laboratory to ensure that collaborating party might retain title to any invention made solely by its employee in exchange for normally granting Government nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license to practice invention by or on behalf of Government for research or for other Government purposes.
1993—Subsec. (d)(2)(B). Pub. L. 103–160, § 3160(1), inserted “(including a weapon production facility of the Department of Energy)” after “facilities” and “, or the production, maintenance, testing, or dismantlement of a nuclear weapon or its components,” after “research and development”.
Subsec. (d)(2)(C). Pub. L. 103–160, § 3160(2), inserted “(including a weapon production facility of the Department of Energy)” after “facility” and “, or the production, maintenance, testing, or dismantlement of a nuclear weapon or its components,” after “research and development”.
Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 103–160, § 3160(3)–(5), added par. (4).
1992—Subsec. (c)(5)(C)(i). Pub. L. 102–484, § 3135(a)(1), substituted “Except as provided in subparagraph (D), any agency” for “Any agency”.
Subsec. (c)(5)(D). Pub. L. 102–484, § 3135(a)(2), added subpar. (D).
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 102–245 inserted “intellectual property,” after “equipment,” in two places.
1991—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 102–25 substituted “naval” for “Naval” in concluding provisions.
1989—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(1)(A), inserted “, and, to the extent provided in an agency-approved joint work statement, the director of any of its Government-owned, contractor-operated laboratories” after “Government-operated Federal laboratories” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(1)(B), (C), substituted “(in the case of a Government-owned, contractor-operated laboratory, subject to subsection (c) of this section) for” for “for Government-owned” and struck out “of Federal employees” before “that may be voluntarily”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(2)(A), (C), inserted “, and, to the extent provided in an agency-approved joint work statement, a Government-owned, contractor-operated laboratory,” after “Government-operated Federal laboratory” in introductory provisions and inserted concluding provisions “A Government-owned, contractor-operated laboratory that enters into a cooperative research and development agreement under subsection (a)(1) of this section may use or obligate royalties or other income accruing to such laboratory under such agreement with respect to any invention only (i) for payments to inventors; (ii) for the purposes described in section 3710c(a)(1)(B)(i), (ii), and (iv) of this title; and (iii) for scientific research and development consistent with the research and development mission and objectives of the laboratory.”
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(2)(B), substituted “a laboratory employee” for “a Federal employee”.
Subsec. (c)(3)(A). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(3), substituted “standards of conduct for its employees” for “employee standards of conduct”.
Subsec. (c)(5)(A). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(4), inserted “presented by the director of a Government-operated laboratory” after “any such agreement”.
Subsec. (c)(5)(B). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(5), inserted “by the director of a Government-operated laboratory” after “an agreement presented”.
Subsec. (c)(5)(C). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(6), added subpar. (C).
Subsec. (c)(7). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(7), added par. (7).
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(8)(B), amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows: “the term ‘laboratory’ means a facility or group of facilities owned, leased, or otherwise used by a Federal agency, a substantial purpose of which is the performance of research, development, or engineering by employees of the Federal Government.”
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(a)(8)(A), (C), added par. (3).
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 101–189, § 3133(b), added subsec. (g).
1988—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–519, § 301(1), substituted “or other intellectual property developed at the laboratory and other inventions or other intellectual property” for “at the laboratory and other inventions”.
Subsec. (b)(4), (5). Pub. L. 100–519, § 301(2), added par. (4) and redesignated former par. (4) as (5).
Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title III, § 40322(b)(2), “(A) In this subsection, the term ‘cooperative research and development agreement’ has the meaning given the term in section 12(d) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a(d)).“(B) Clause (ii) [sic] of section 12(c)(7)(B) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a(c)(7)(B)), as added by subsection (a) of this section, shall apply with respect to any cooperative research and development agreement that is in effect as of the day before the date of enactment of this Act [
For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
Pub. L. 106–404, § 8, “(a) Within 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [“(1) joint work statements under section 12(c)(5)(C) or (D) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a(c)(5)(C) or (D)); or“(2) in the case of laboratories described in section 12(d)(2)(A) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a(d)(2)(A)), cooperative research and development agreements under such section 12,with respect to major proposed cooperative research and development agreements that involve critical national security technology or may have a significant impact on domestic or international competitiveness.“(b) Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [“(1) determine the adequacy of existing procedures and methods for interagency coordination and awareness with respect to cooperative research and development agreements described in subsection (a); and“(2) establish and distribute to appropriate Federal agencies—“(A) specific criteria to indicate the necessity for gathering and considering the views of other agencies on joint work statements or cooperative research and development agreements as described in subsection (a); and“(B) additional procedures, if any, for carrying out such gathering and considering of agency views with respect to cooperative research and development agreements described in subsection (a).Procedures established under this subsection shall be designed to the extent possible to use or modify existing procedures, to minimize burdens on Federal agencies, to encourage industrial partnerships with national laboratories, and to minimize delay in the approval or disapproval of joint work statements and cooperative research and development agreements.“(c) Nothing in this Act [see Short Title of 2000 Amendment note set out under section 3701 of this title], nor any procedures established under this section shall provide to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the National Science and Technology Council, or any Federal agency the authority to disapprove a cooperative research and development agreement or joint work statement, under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a), of another Federal agency.”
The Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with the Secretary of Transportation, authorized to conduct research and development activities on magnetic levitation technology using contracts or cooperative research and development agreements under this section, see section 417 of Pub. L. 101–640, set out as a note under section 2313 of Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters.
Section 3133(d) of Pub. L. 101–189, as amended by Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, § 828(a), “(1) Not later than 150 days after the date of enactment of this Act [“(A) establish technology transfer, including cooperative research and development agreements, as a mission for the laboratory under section 11(a)(1) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 [15 U.S.C. 3710(a)(1)];“(B) describe the respective obligations and responsibilities of the agency and the laboratory with respect to this part [part C (§§ 3131–3133) of title XXXI of div. C of Pub. L. 101–189, see Short Title of 1989 Amendment note under section 3701 of this title] and section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 [15 U.S.C. 3710a];“(C) require that, except as provided in paragraph (2), no employee of the laboratory shall have a substantial role (including an advisory role) in the preparation, negotiation, or approval of a cooperative research and development agreement if, to such employee’s knowledge—“(i) such employee, or the spouse, child, parent, sibling, or partner of such employee, or an organization (other than the laboratory) in which such employee serves as an officer, director, trustee, partner, or employee—“(I) holds a financial interest in any entity, other than the laboratory, that has a substantial interest in the preparation, negotiation, or approval of the cooperative research and development agreement; or“(II) receives a gift or gratuity from any entity, other than the laboratory, that has a substantial interest in the preparation, negotiation, or approval of the cooperative research and development agreement; or“(ii) a financial interest in any entity, other than the laboratory, that has a substantial interest in the preparation, negotiation, or approval of the cooperative research and development agreement, is held by any person or organization with whom such employee is negotiating or has any arrangement concerning prospective employment;“(D) require that each employee of the laboratory who negotiates or approves a cooperative research and development agreement shall certify to the agency that the circumstances described in subparagraph (C)(i) and (ii) do not apply to such employee;“(E) require the laboratory to widely disseminate information on opportunities to participate with the laboratory in technology transfer, including cooperative research and development agreements; and“(F) provides for an accounting of all royalty or other income received under cooperative research and development agreements.“(2) The requirements described in paragraph (1)(C) and (D) shall not apply in a case where the negotiating or approving employee advises the agency that reviewed the applicable joint work statement under section 12(c)(5)(C)(i) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 [15 U.S.C. 3710a(c)(5)(C)(i)] in advance of the matter in which he is to participate and the nature of any financial interest described in paragraph (1)(C), and where the agency employee determines that such financial interest is not so substantial as to be considered likely to affect the integrity of the laboratory employee’s service in that matter.“(3) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [“(4) No Government-owned, contractor-operated laboratory may enter into a cooperative research and development agreement under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 [15 U.S.C. 3710a] unless—“(A) that laboratory’s operating contract contains the provisions described in paragraph (1)(A) through (F); or“(B) such laboratory agrees in a separate writing to be bound by the provisions described in paragraph (1)(A) through (F).“(5) Any contract for a Government-owned, contractor-operated laboratory entered into after the expiration of 150 days after the date of enactment of this Act [“(6) Contract provisions referred to in paragraph (1) shall include only such provisions as are necessary to carry out paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection.”
[Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title VIII, § 828(b),